Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Understanding and utilizing the inner bonds of process tensors

Published 1 Apr 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.mes-hall | (2404.01287v2)

Abstract: Process tensor matrix product operators (PT-MPOs) enable numerically exact simulations for an unprecedentedly broad range of open quantum systems. By representing environment influences in MPO form, they can be efficiently compressed using established algorithms. The dimensions of inner bonds of the compressed PT-MPO may be viewed as an indicator of the complexity of the environment. Here, we show that the inner bonds themselves, not only their dimensions, have a concrete physical meaning: They represent the subspace of the full environment Liouville space which hosts environment excitations that may influence the subsequent open quantum systems dynamics the most. This connection can be expressed in terms of lossy linear transformations, whose pseudoinverses facilitate the extraction of environment observables. We demonstrate this by extracting the environment spin of a central spin problem, the current through a quantum system coupled to two leads, the number of photons emitted from quantum emitters into a structured environment, and the distribution of the total absorbed energy in a driven non-Markovian quantum system into system, environment, and interaction energy terms. Numerical tests further indicate that different PT-MPO algorithms compress environments to similar subspaces. Thus, the physical interpretation of inner bonds of PT-MPOs both provides a conceptional understanding and it enables new practical applications.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
  2. F. Ungar, M. Cygorek, and V. M. Axt, Phys. Rev. B 95, 245203 (2017).
  3. S. Lüker and D. E. Reiter, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34, 063002 (2019).
  4. E. V. Denning, M. Bundgaard-Nielsen, and J. Mørk, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235303 (2020).
  5. B. Gulácsi and G. Burkard, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174511 (2023).
  6. A. Nazir and D. P. S. McCutcheon, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 103002 (2016).
  7. J. Wiercinski, E. M. Gauger, and M. Cygorek, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013176 (2023).
  8. R. Feynman and F. Vernon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 118 (1963).
  9. R. Orús, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 349, 117 (2014).
  10. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 96 (2011).
  11. I. V. Oseledets, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 33, 2295 (2011).
  12. M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240602 (2019).
  13. L. Vannucci and N. Gregersen, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195306 (2023).
  14. M. Richter and S. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 167403 (2022).
  15. V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Open quantum system dynamics from infinite tensor network contraction (2023), arXiv:2307.01802 [quant-ph] .
  16. E. Ye and G. K.-L. Chan, The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, 044104 (2021).
  17. C. Guo, K. Modi, and D. Poletti, Phys. Rev. A 102, 062414 (2020).
  18. M.-D. Choi, Linear Algebra and its Applications 10, 285 (1975).
  19. A. Jamiołkowski, Reports on Mathematical Physics 3, 275 (1972).
  20. N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4600 (1995a).
  21. N. Makri and D. E. Makarov, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4611 (1995b).
  22. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006).
  23. I. Vilkoviskiy and D. A. Abanin, A bound on approximating non-markovian dynamics by tensor networks in the time domain (2023), arXiv:2307.15592 [quant-ph] .
  24. N. Dowling and K. Modi, Quantum chaos = volume-law spatiotemporal entanglement (2022).
  25. H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008).
  26. C. Eckart and G. Young, Psychometrika 1, 211 (1936).
  27. E. H. Moore, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 26, 394 (1920).
  28. P. Talkner, E. Lutz, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. E 75, 050102 (2007).
  29. J. Cerrillo and J. Cao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 110401 (2014).
  30. N. Makri, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 041104 (2020).
  31. J. Iles-Smith, N. Lambert, and A. Nazir, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032114 (2014).
  32. D. Tamascelli, Entropy 22 (2020).
  33. F. A. Y. N. Schröder and A. W. Chin, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075105 (2016).
  34. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, F. A. Y. N. Schröder, and A. W. Chin, Phys. Rev. B 96, 115427 (2017).
  35. The TEMPO collaboration, OQuPy: A Python 3 package to efficiently compute non-Markovian open quantum systems. (2020).
  36. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  37. A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010).
  38. Ángel Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 094001 (2014).
Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.