What an event is not: unravelling the identity of events in quantum theory and gravity
Abstract: We explore the notion of events at the intersection between quantum physics and gravity, inspired by recent research on superpositions of semiclassical spacetimes. By going through various experiments and thought experiments -- from a decaying atom, to the double-slit experiment, to the quantum switch -- we analyse which properties can and cannot be used to define events in such non-classical contexts. Our findings suggest an operational, context-dependent definition of events which emphasises that their properties can be accessed without destroying or altering observed phenomena. We discuss the implications of this understanding of events for indefinite causal order as well as the non-absoluteness of events in the Wigner's friend thought experiment. These findings provide a first step for developing a notion of event in quantum spacetime.
- C. M. DeWitt and D. Rickles, The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference, ASTIA document (Ed. Open Access, 2011).
- M. Aspelmeyer, When Zeh Meets Feynman: How to Avoid the Appearance of a Classical World in Gravity Experiments, in From Quantum to Classical: Essays in Honour of H.-Dieter Zeh, edited by C. Kiefer (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022) pp. 85–95.
- M. Christodoulou and C. Rovelli, On the possibility of laboratory evidence for quantum superposition of geometries, Physics Letters B 792, 64–68 (2019).
- D. Wallace, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB, 2012).
- C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack, Quantum-Bayesian coherence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1693–1715 (2013).
- Č. Brukner, On the quantum measurement problem, in Quantum [Un]Speakables II: Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem, edited by R. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017) pp. 95–117.
- E. Adlam, What Does ‘(Non)-absoluteness of Observed Events’ Mean?, Foundations of Physics 54, 13 (2024).
- N. Ormrod and J. Barrett, Quantum influences and event relativity (2024), arXiv:2401.18005 [quant-ph] .
- F. Costa and S. Shrapnel, Quantum causal modelling, New Journal of Physics 18, 063032 (2016).
- J. Barrett, R. Lorenz, and O. Oreshkov, Quantum causal models (2020), arXiv:1906.10726 [quant-ph] .
- J. Barrett, R. Lorenz, and O. Oreshkov, Cyclic quantum causal models, Nature Communications 12, 885 (2021).
- L. Hardy, Probability theories with dynamic causal structure: A new framework for quantum gravity (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0509120 [gr-qc] .
- O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nature Communications 3, 1092 (2012).
- O. Oreshkov, Time-delocalized quantum subsystems and operations: on the existence of processes with indefinite causal structure in quantum mechanics, Quantum 3, 206 (2019).
- N. Paunković and M. Vojinović, Causal orders, quantum circuits and spacetime: distinguishing between definite and superposed causal orders, Quantum 4, 275 (2020).
- R. Faleiro, N. Paunkovic, and M. Vojinovic, Operational interpretation of the vacuum and process matrices for identical particles, Quantum 7, 986 (2023).
- V. Vilasini and R. Renner, Embedding cyclic causal structures in acyclic spacetimes: no-go results for process matrices (2022), arXiv:2203.11245 [quant-ph] .
- Y.-H. Kim, R. Yu, S. P. Kulik, Y. Shih, and M. O. Scully, Delayed “choice” quantum eraser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1–5 (2000).
- M. Araújo, F. Costa, and Č. Brukner, Computational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250402 (2014).
- G. W. Leibniz and L. E. Loemker, Philosophical Papers and Letters, edited by L. E. Loemker (University of Chicago Press, Chicago,, 1956).
- P. Forrest, The Identity of Indiscernibles, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2020) Winter 2020 ed.
- N. Bohr, Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1931).
- J. Bub, Why Bohr was (Mostly) Right (2017), arXiv:1711.01604 [quant-ph] .
- R. Healey, The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2017).
- D. Lewis, On the Plurality of Worlds (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Mass., 1986).
- J. Pearl, Causality, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
- C. Rovelli, Relational quantum mechanics, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35, 1637–1678 (1996).
- F. Laudisa and C. Rovelli, Relational Quantum Mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021) Winter 2021 ed.
- E. Adlam and C. Rovelli, Information is physical: Cross-perspective links in relational quantum mechanics, Philosophy of Physics 1, 10.31389/pop.8 (2023).
- C. Rovelli, Space is blue and birds fly through it, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376, 20170312 (2018), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2017.0312 .
- L. Vaidman, Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021) Fall 2021 ed.
- A. Di Biagio and C. Rovelli, Stable Facts, Relative Fact, Foundations of Physics 51, 30 (2021).
- Č. Brukner, Wigner’s friend and relational objectivity, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 628–630 (2022).
- N. Ormrod and J. Barrett, A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic (2022), arXiv:2209.03940 [quant-ph] .
- E. P. Wigner, Remarks on the mind-body question, in Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses, edited by J. Mehra (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995) pp. 247–260.
- Č. Brukner, A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts, Entropy 20, 350 (2018).
- D. Frauchiger and R. Renner, Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself, Nature Communications 9, 3711 (2018).
- E. G. Cavalcanti, The View from a Wigner Bubble, Foundations of Physics 51, 39 (2021).
- D. Deutsch, Quantum theory as a universal physical theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1–41 (1985).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.