Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Circular reasoning: Solving the Hubble tension with a non-$π$ value of $π$ (2403.20219v1)

Published 29 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.CO and hep-ph

Abstract: Recently, cosmology has seen a surge in alternative models that purport to solve the discrepancy between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ as measured by cosmological microwave background anisotropies and local supernovae, respectively. In particular, many of the most successful approaches have involved varying fundamental constants, such as an alternative value of the fine structure constant and time-varying values of the electron mass, the latter of which showed particular promise as the strongest candidate in several earlier studies. Inspired by these approaches, in this paper, we investigate a cosmological model where the value of the geometric constant $\pi$ is taken to be a free model parameter. Using the latest CMB data from Planck as well as baryon-acoustic oscillation data, we constrain the parameters of the model and find a strong correlation between $\pi$ and $H_0$, with the final constraint $H_0 = 71.3 \pm 1.1 \ \mathrm{ km/s/Mpc}$, equivalent to a mere $1.5\sigma$ discrepancy with the value measured by the SH0ES collaboration. Furthermore, our results show that $\pi = 3.206 \pm 0.038$ at $95 \%$ C.L., which is in good agreement with several external measurements discussed in the paper. Hence, we conclude that the $\pi \Lambda$CDM model presented in this paper, which has only a single extra parameter, currently stands as the perhaps strongest solution to the Hubble tension.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. N. Schöneberg, G. Franco Abellán, A. Pérez Sánchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, “The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,” Phys. Rept. 984 (2022) 1–55, arXiv:2107.10291 [astro-ph.CO].
  2. E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) no. 15, 153001, arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO].
  3. L. Hart and J. Chluba, “Updated fundamental constant constraints from Planck 2018 data and possible relations to the Hubble tension,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493 (2020) no. 3, 3255–3263, arXiv:1912.03986 [astro-ph.CO].
  4. L. Hart and J. Chluba, “New constraints on time-dependent variations of fundamental constants using Planck data,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474 (2018) no. 2, 1850–1861, arXiv:1705.03925 [astro-ph.CO].
  5. J.-P. Uzan, “The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status,”Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (Apr., 2003) 403–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.403.
  6. A. R. Khalife, M. B. Zanjani, S. Galli, S. Günther, J. Lesgourgues, and K. Benabed, “Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data,” arXiv:2312.09814 [astro-ph.CO].
  7. E. O. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and D. Sherwin, “MCMC Marginalisation Bias and ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM tensions,” arXiv:2307.16349 [astro-ph.CO].
  8. S. A. Adil, O. Akarsu, M. Malekjani, E. O. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi, A. A. Sen, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “S8 increases with effective redshift in ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM cosmology,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 528 (2023) no. 1, L20–L26, arXiv:2303.06928 [astro-ph.CO].
  9. J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: efficient implementation of non-cold relics,” JCAP 09 (2011) 032, arXiv:1104.2935 [astro-ph.CO].
  10. G. P. T. Chat, “Tutorial on Variable Standard Geometry,” (2024) To appear on arXiv. [astro-ph.CO].
  11. The holy scriptures, 600 BCE.
  12. Indiana General Assembly, “Bill No. 246,” 1897.
  13. T. L. Heath, The Works of Archimedes. Robert M. Hutchins, ed., Great Books of the Western World, vol. 11, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
  14. W. Shanks, “Rectification of the Circle,” Contributions to Mathematics (1853) .
  15. J. El Gammal, S. Günther, E. B. Holm, and A. Nygaard, “Big Data: Constraining π𝜋\piitalic_π using 1010superscript101010^{10}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 10 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT hand-drawn circles,” (2026) To appear on arXiv. [astro-ph.CO].
  16. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,” JCAP 07 (2011) 034, arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO].
  17. J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, “Fast and accurate CMB computations in non-flat FLRW universes,” JCAP 09 (2014) 032, arXiv:1312.2697 [astro-ph.CO].
  18. A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden, and M. Manera, “The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15𝑧0.15z=0.15italic_z = 0.15,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449 (2015) no. 1, 835–847, arXiv:1409.3242 [astro-ph.CO].
  19. F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson, “The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (jul, 2011) 3017–3032. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2011.19250.x.
  20. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, “MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features,” arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO].
  21. B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, K. Benabed, and S. Prunet, “Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code,” JCAP 1302 (2013) 001, arXiv:1210.7183 [astro-ph.CO].
  22. The holy scriptures, (4048) To appear on stone tablets in Tibet.
  23. J. El Gammal, S. Günther, E. B. Holm, and A. Nygaard, “Are constant constants a lie? Investigating the redshift-dependence of all numbers,” (2026) To appear on arXiv. [astro-ph.CO].
  24. J. El Gammal, S. Günther, E. B. Holm, and A. Nygaard, “Updated cosmological constraints on π𝜋\piitalic_π,” (2025) To appear on arXiv. [astro-ph.CO].
  25. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2653673.
  26. J. El Gammal, S. Günther, E. B. Holm, and A. Nygaard, “z𝑧zitalic_z’s all the way down: Solving the Hubble tension by redshift-dependent redshift,” (2026) To appear on arXiv. [astro-ph.CO].
  27. C. F. Sharpe, L. A. Barnes, and G. F. Lewis, “On cosmological low entropy after the Big Bang: universal expansion and nucleosynthesis,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 55 (2023) no. 2, 41, arXiv:2302.03988 [astro-ph.CO].
  28. God, Personal communication. March 31stst{}^{\rm st}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT roman_st end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, 2024.

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel approach by treating the geometric constant π as a free parameter in the ΛCDM model to address the Hubble tension.
  • It combines Planck, BAO, and SH0ES data to yield H0 = 71.3 ± 1.1 km/s/Mpc and a variable π value of 3.206 ± 0.038 at 95% confidence.
  • The study suggests that reexamining fundamental geometric constants may open new avenues for resolving discrepancies in cosmological measurements.

An Examination of the Proposal to Resolve the Hubble Tension through a Non-Standard Value of π\pi

Introduction

The paper "Circular reasoning: Solving the Hubble tension with a non-π\pi value of π\pi" asserts a novel approach to reconcile the well-known Hubble tension by considering the geometric constant π\pi as a free parameter in cosmological models. Hubble tension denotes the discrepancy between the value of the Hubble constant H0H_0 obtained from measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and values obtained through local observations, such as supernovae.

Theoretical Foundation

In the pursuit to resolve the Hubble tension, the authors expand upon previous methodologies that modify fundamental constants, such as the fine structure constant and electron mass. This paper takes an unconventional course, proposing that the value of π\pi, a geometric constant, can vary and should be treated as a parameter within the Λ\LambdaCDM model. This modified model, referred to as πΛ\pi\LambdaCDM, derives theoretical support from the concept of extra dimensions pointed out in theories like Kaluza-Klein and string theories. In these frameworks, what we perceive as fundamental constants could feasibly differ or "run" due to the characteristics of higher-dimensional spaces.

Methodology and Results

Utilizing data from the Planck CMB measurements and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), the authors perform parameter inference to ascertain the optimal value of π\pi that minimizes the tensions in H0H_0. When only Planck and BAO data are used, a moderate resolution of the Hubble tension is achieved; however, the inclusion of the SH0ES prior on H0H_0 further reduces the tension to an insignificant level, specifically a 1.5σ1.5\sigma discrepancy, indicating satisfactory convergence between different H0H_0 values.

The derived value of the Hubble constant, when incorporating all datasets including SH0ES, is H0=71.3±1.1H_0 = 71.3 \pm 1.1 km/s/Mpc. Simultaneously, the study postulates a value for π\pi of 3.206±0.0383.206 \pm 0.038 at a 95% confidence level, deviating from its traditional Euclidean value.

Implications and Future Work

This model, with its single additional degree of freedom, demonstrates a potential in offering a less contentious solution to the Hubble tension than models introducing numerous additional parameters. In particular, the correlation found between π\pi and H0H_0 suggests that modifications of geometric structure constants could be a viable direction for resolving cosmological discrepancies.

However, the notion of a variable π\pi raises numerous theoretical questions. It calls for an investigation into potential impacts on established physical laws, such as those describing wave mechanics where π\pi plays a fundamental role. Moreover, the rejection of π\pi's constancy might imply broad, profound amendments to our understanding of spatial structure in physics, possibly requiring reconsideration of various physical phenomena that rely on geometric invariants.

The authors acknowledge the primitive nature of their approach, committing to future work that extends to configurations involving time-dependent π\pi values or exploring other constants. This further research could potentially clear the "dark ages" of π\pi, grappling with constraints from cosmic history to reinforce their framework.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the paper offers an intriguing hypothesis and delivers numerical resolution to a significant problem in cosmology—the Hubble tension—it naturally attracts skepticism by challenging what is conventionally a fixed numerical constant. Future explorations in this vein might bring about new insights, not just into the Hubble tension, but into the very fabric of cosmological theories and the constants that underpin them. As with any model proposing fundamental shifts, robust theoretical justifications and comprehensive empirical validations are paramount to transition from speculative ideas to accepted scientific advancement.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 10 tweets with 62 likes about this paper.