Topologically protected flatness in chiral moiré heterostructures
Abstract: The observation of delicate correlated phases in twisted heterostructures of graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides suggests that moir\'e flat bands are intrinsically resilient against certain types of disorder. Here, we investigate the robustness of moir\'e flat bands in the chiral limit of the Bistrizer-MacDonald model -- applicable to both platforms in certain limits -- and demonstrate drastic differences between the first magic angle and higher magic angles in response to chiral symmetric disorder that arise, for instance, from lattice relaxation. Using a hidden constant of motion, we decompose the non-abelian gauge field induced by interlayer tunnelings into two decoupled abelian ones, whose effective magnetic field splits into an anomalous contribution and a fluctuating part. The anomalous field maps the moir\'e flat bands onto a zeroth Dirac Landau level, whose flatness withstands any chiral symmetric perturbation due to a topological index theorem -- thereby underscoring a topological mechanism for band flatness. Only the first magic angle can fully harness this topological protection due to its weak fluctuating magnetic field. In higher magic angles, the amplitude of fluctuations largely exceeds the anomalous contribution, which we find results in an extremely large sensitivity to microscopic details. Through numerical simulations, we study various types of disorder and identify the processes that are enhanced or suppressed in the chiral limit. Interestingly, we find that the topological suppression of disorder broadening persists away from the chiral limit and is further accentuated by isolating a single sublattice polarized flat band in energy. Our analysis suggests the Berry curvature hotspot at the top of the $K$ and $K'$ valence band in the transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers is essential for the stability of its moir\'e flat bands and their correlated states.
- A. Vaezi, Physical Review X 4, 031009 (2014).
- M. Barkeshli, Physical Review Letters 117, 096803 (2016).
- M. Barkeshli and X.-G. Wen, Physical Review B 84, 10.1103/physrevb.84.115121 (2011).
- M. Barkeshli and X.-L. Qi, Physical Review X 2, 031013 (2012).
- V. Crépel, N. Regnault, and B. Estienne, Physical Review B 100, 125128 (2019).
- V. Crépel and N. Regnault, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05622 (2024).
- A. Y. Kitaev, Annals of physics 303, 2 (2003).
- H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, and A. C. Gossard, Reviews of Modern Physics 71, S298 (1999).
- N. Nakatsuji and M. Koshino, Physical Review B 105, 245408 (2022).
- A. Thomson and J. Alicea, Physical Review B 103, 125138 (2021).
- N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review X 1, 021014 (2011).
- Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Physical Review A 19, 2461 (1979).
- M. Katsnelson and K. Novoselov, Solid State Communications 143, 3 (2007).
- H. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Physics Letters B 105, 219 (1981).
- F. Zhang, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Physical Review B 86, 081303 (2012).
- T. Kawarabayashi, Y. Hatsugai, and H. Aoki, Physical Review Letters 103, 156804 (2009).
- R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 12233 (2011).
- G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Physical Review Letters 122, 106405 (2019).
- V. Crépel, N. Regnault, and R. Queiroz, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10477 (2023a).
- D. Guerci, P. Simon, and C. Mora, Physical Review Research 4, L012013 (2022).
- J. Wang and Z. Liu, Physical Review Letters 128, 176403 (2022).
- A. Parhizkar and V. Galitski, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00824 (2023).
- M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, Annals of mathematics , 484 (1968).
- M. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 81, 2597 (1984).
- S. Becker, I. Oltman, and M. Vogel, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12799 (2024).
- M. Katsnelson and M. Prokhorova, Physical Review B 77, 205424 (2008).
- B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and V. Crépel, Physical Review Research 5, L032048 (2023).
- J. Liu, J. Liu, and X. Dai, Physical Review B 99, 155415 (2019).
- Y. Sheffer and A. Stern, Physical Review B 104, L121405 (2021).
- P. Bruno, V. K. Dugaev, and M. Taillefumier, Physical Review Letters 93, 096806 (2004).
- I. Martin and C. Batista, Physical Review Letters 101, 156402 (2008).
- S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Nature 527, 212 (2015).
- N. Verma, Z. Addison, and M. Randeria, Science Advances 8, eabq2765 (2022).
- N. Morales-Durán, N. Wei, and A. H. MacDonald, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03143 (2023).
- S. Becker, I. Oltman, and M. Vogel, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02701 (2023).
- Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review Letters 129, 047601 (2022).
- Y.-H. Zhang, H. C. Po, and T. Senthil, Physical Review B 100, 125104 (2019).
- Y. Sheffer, R. Queiroz, and A. Stern, Physical Review X 13, 021012 (2023).
- V. Crépel and A. Millis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15546 (2024).
- J. Kang and O. Vafek, Physical Review B 107, 075408 (2023).
- O. Vafek and J. Kang, Physical Review B 107, 075123 (2023).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.