Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Non-Linear Matter Power Spectrum Modeling in Interacting Dark Energy Cosmologies

Published 28 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.CO and gr-qc | (2403.19590v2)

Abstract: Understanding the behavior of the matter power spectrum on non-linear scales beyond the $\Lambda$CDM model is crucial for accurately predicting the large-scale structure (LSS) of the Universe in non-standard cosmologies. In this work, we present an analysis of the non-linear matter power spectrum within the framework of interacting dark energy-dark matter cosmologies (IDE). We employ N-body simulations and theoretical models to investigate the impact of IDE on these non-linear scales. Beginning with N-body simulations characterized by a fixed parameter space delineated by prior observational research, we adeptly fit the simulated spectra with a simple parametric function, achieving accuracy within 5\%. Subsequently, we refine a modified halo model tailored to the IDE cosmology, exhibiting exceptional precision in fitting the simulations down to scales of approximately 1 h/Mpc. To assess the model's robustness, we conduct a forecast analysis for the Euclid survey, employing our refined model. We find that the coupling parameter $\xi$ will be constrained to $\sigma(\xi) = 0.0110$. This marks a significant improvement by an order of magnitude compared to any other current observational tests documented in the literature. These primary findings pave the way for a novel preliminary approach, enabling the utilization of IDE models for observational constraints concerning LSS data on non-linear scales.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. D. Huterer and D. L. Shafer, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 016901 (2017).
  2. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] .
  3. A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7 (2022a), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. Y. S. Murakami, A. G. Riess, B. E. Stahl, W. D. Kenworthy, D.-M. A. Pluck, A. Macoretta, D. Brout, D. O. Jones, D. M. Scolnic,  and A. V. Filippenko, “Leveraging sn ia spectroscopic similarity to improve the measurement of h0subscriptℎ0h_{0}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,”  (2023), arXiv:2306.00070 [astro-ph.CO] .
  5. F. J. Q. et al, “The atacama cosmology telescope: A measurement of the dr6 cmb lensing power spectrum and its implications for structure growth,”  (2023), arXiv:2304.05202 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. E. Di Valentino et al., Astropart. Phys. 131, 102604 (2021a), arXiv:2008.11285 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. R. C. Nunes and S. Vagnozzi, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505, 5427 (2021).
  8. A. Amon et al. (DES), Phys. Rev. D 105, 023514 (2022), arXiv:2105.13543 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. M. Asgari et al. (KiDS), Astron. Astrophys. 645, A104 (2021a), arXiv:2007.15633 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, New Astronomy Reviews 95, 101659 (2022).
  11. E. Abdalla et al., JHEAp 34, 49 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO] .
  12. L. Knox and M. Millea, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043533 (2020), arXiv:1908.03663 [astro-ph.CO] .
  13. M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73, 153 (2023), arXiv:2211.04492 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. S. Kumar and R. C. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123511 (2016), arXiv:1608.02454 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. S. Kumar and R. C. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103511 (2017), arXiv:1702.02143 [astro-ph.CO] .
  16. E. Di Valentino and O. Mena, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, L22 (2020), arXiv:2009.12620 [astro-ph.CO] .
  17. M. Lucca and D. C. Hooper, Phys. Rev. D 102, 123502 (2020a), arXiv:2002.06127 [astro-ph.CO] .
  18. Y.-H. Yao and X.-H. Meng, Phys. Dark Univ. 30, 100729 (2020).
  19. E. Di Valentino, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502, 2065 (2020), arXiv:2011.00246 [astro-ph.CO] .
  20. Y. Yao and X.-H. Meng, Phys. Dark Univ. 33, 100852 (2021), arXiv:2011.09160 [astro-ph.CO] .
  21. M. Lucca, Phys. Dark Univ. 34, 100899 (2021a), arXiv:2105.09249 [astro-ph.CO] .
  22. J. de Cruz Perez and J. Sola Peracaula, Phys. Dark Univ. 43, 101406 (2024), arXiv:2302.04807 [astro-ph.CO] .
  23. S. Kumar, Phys. Dark Univ. 33, 100862 (2021), arXiv:2102.12902 [astro-ph.CO] .
  24. M. Lucca, Phys. Rev. D 104, 083510 (2021b), arXiv:2106.15196 [astro-ph.CO] .
  25. A. Halder and M. Pandey, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508, 3446 (2021), arXiv:2101.05228 [astro-ph.CO] .
  26. M. Lucca, “Dark energy-dark matter interactions as a solution to the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension,”  (2021c), arXiv:2105.09249 [astro-ph.CO] .
  27. E. Mawas, L. Street, R. Gass,  and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, “Interacting dark energy axions in light of the hubble tension,”  (2021), arXiv:2108.13317 [astro-ph.CO] .
  28. M. Lucca and D. C. Hooper, Physical Review D 102 (2020b), 10.1103/physrevd.102.123502.
  29. M. A. van der Westhuizen and A. Abebe, JCAP 01, 048 (2024), arXiv:2302.11949 [gr-qc] .
  30. T. Matsubara, Physical Review D 78, 083519 (2008).
  31. K. Carrion, P. Carrilho, A. S. Mancini, A. Pourtsidou,  and J. C. Hidalgo, “Dark scattering: accelerated constraints from kids-1000 with 𝚁𝚎𝙰𝙲𝚃𝚁𝚎𝙰𝙲𝚃\tt{ReACT}typewriter_ReACT and 𝙲𝚘𝚜𝚖𝚘𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙲𝚘𝚜𝚖𝚘𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛\tt{CosmoPower}typewriter_CosmoPower,”  (2024), arXiv:2402.18562 [astro-ph.CO] .
  32. A. Spurio Mancini and A. Pourtsidou, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 512, L44–L48 (2022).
  33. B. R. Dinda and N. Banerjee, “Constraints on the speed of sound in the k-essence model of dark energy,”  (2023), arXiv:2309.10538 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. Y. Li, C. Modi, D. Jamieson, Y. Zhang, L. Lu, Y. Feng, F. Lanusse,  and L. Greengard, “Differentiable cosmological simulation with adjoint method,”  (2022), arXiv:2211.09815 [astro-ph.IM] .
  35. F. R. Bouchet, S. Colombi, E. Hivon,  and R. Juszkiewicz, “Perturbative lagrangian approach to gravitational instability,”  (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9406013 [astro-ph] .
  36. M. Baldi, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422, 1028 (2012).
  37. M. Baldi, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 521, 613 (2023).
  38. D. Palma and G. N. Candlish, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526, 1904 (2023).
  39. M. Asgari, A. J. Mead,  and C. Heymans, “The halo model for cosmology: a pedagogical review,”  (2023), arXiv:2303.08752 [astro-ph.CO] .
  40. R. K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 308, 119 (1999).
  41. J. Jackson, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 156, 1P (1972).
  42. N. Kaiser, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 227, 1 (1987).
  43. T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, Physics of the Dark Universe 24, 100260 (2019).
  44. T. A. et al., Physical Review D 105 (2022), 10.1103/physrevd.105.043512.
  45. M. Asgari et al. (KiDS), Astron. Astrophys. 645, A104 (2021b), arXiv:2007.15633 [astro-ph.CO] .
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free