Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Tachyonic instability and spontaneous scalarization in parameterized Schwarzschild-like black holes

Published 28 Mar 2024 in gr-qc | (2403.19392v2)

Abstract: We study the phenomenon of spontaneous scalarization in parameterized Schwarzschild-like black holes. Two metrics are considered, the Konoplya-Zhidenko metric and the Johannsen-Psaltis metric. While these metrics can mimic the Schwarzschild black hole well in the weak-field regime, they have deformed geometries in the near-horizon strong-field region. Such deformations notably influence the emergence of tachyonic instability and subsequent spontaneous scalarization, enabling a clear distinction between these parameterized metrics and the standard Schwarzschild metric. These results suggest a possible way to test the parameterized black holes and thus the Kerr hypothesis by observing the phenomenon of spontaneous scalarization.

Authors (3)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, “Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2220–2223.
  2. D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “New Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes with Curvature-Induced Scalarization in Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 13, (2018) 131103, arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc].
  3. H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, “Spontaneous scalarization of black holes and compact stars from a Gauss-Bonnet coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 13, (2018) 131104, arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc].
  4. G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos, and P. Kanti, “Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 13, (2018) 131102, arXiv:1711.03390 [hep-th].
  5. P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, “Spontaneously Scalarized Kerr Black Holes in Extended Scalar-Tensor–Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no. 1, (2019) 011101, arXiv:1904.09997 [gr-qc].
  6. C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and N. Yunes, “Spin-induced scalarized black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 1, (2021) 011103, arXiv:2009.03904 [gr-qc].
  7. E. Berti, L. G. Collodel, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, “Spin-induced black-hole scalarization in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 1, (2021) 011104, arXiv:2009.03905 [gr-qc].
  8. Y.-X. Gao, Y. Huang, and D.-J. Liu, “Scalar perturbations on the background of Kerr black holes in the quadratic dynamical Chern-Simons gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 4, (2019) 044020, arXiv:1808.01433 [gr-qc].
  9. Y. S. Myung and D.-C. Zou, “Onset of rotating scalarized black holes in Einstein-Chern-Simons-Scalar theory,” Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136081, arXiv:2012.02375 [gr-qc].
  10. D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Spontaneously scalarized black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: dynamics and equilibrium solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 8, (2021) 083007, arXiv:2102.03940 [gr-qc].
  11. S.-J. Zhang, “Massive scalar field perturbation on Kerr black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 5, (2021) 441, arXiv:2102.10479 [gr-qc].
  12. S.-J. Zhang, B. Wang, E. Papantonopoulos, and A. Wang, “Magnetic-induced spontaneous scalarization in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 1, (2023) 97, arXiv:2209.02268 [gr-qc].
  13. C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, and J. A. Font, “Spontaneous Scalarization of Charged Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 10, (2018) 101102, arXiv:1806.05190 [gr-qc].
  14. C.-Y. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, W.-K. Luo, Y. Tian, and B. Wang, “Critical Phenomena in Dynamical Scalarization of Charged Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 16, (2022) 161105, arXiv:2112.07455 [gr-qc].
  15. E. Barausse, C. Palenzuela, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, “Neutron-star mergers in scalar-tensor theories of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 081506, arXiv:1212.5053 [gr-qc].
  16. D. D. Doneva, A. Vañó Viñuales, and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Dynamical descalarization with a jump during a black hole merger,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 6, (2022) L061502, arXiv:2204.05333 [gr-qc].
  17. M. Elley, H. O. Silva, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, “Spin-induced dynamical scalarization, descalarization, and stealthness in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity during a black hole coalescence,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) 044018, arXiv:2205.06240 [gr-qc].
  18. C. Palenzuela, E. Barausse, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, “Dynamical scalarization of neutron stars in scalar-tensor gravity theories,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 4, (2014) 044024, arXiv:1310.4481 [gr-qc].
  19. M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, H. Okawa, and A. Buonanno, “Coalescence of binary neutron stars in a scalar-tensor theory of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 084005, arXiv:1310.0627 [gr-qc].
  20. H. O. Silva, H. Witek, M. Elley, and N. Yunes, “Dynamical Descalarization in Binary Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 3, (2021) 031101, arXiv:2012.10436 [gr-qc].
  21. K. Taniguchi, M. Shibata, and A. Buonanno, “Quasiequilibrium sequences of binary neutron stars undergoing dynamical scalarization,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 2, (2015) 024033, arXiv:1410.0738 [gr-qc].
  22. D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazanoğlu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Scalarization,” arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc].
  23. L. K. Wong, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, “Constraining spontaneous black hole scalarization in scalar-tensor-Gauss-Bonnet theories with current gravitational-wave data,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 2, (2022) 024008, arXiv:2204.09038 [gr-qc].
  24. P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley, “Dilatonic black holes in higher curvature string gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5049–5058, arXiv:hep-th/9511071.
  25. D. Ayzenberg and N. Yunes, “Slowly-Rotating Black Holes in Einstein-Dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity: Quadratic Order in Spin Solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 044066, arXiv:1405.2133 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 069905 (2015)].
  26. A. Maselli, P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, and V. Ferrari, “Rotating black holes in Einstein-Dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with finite coupling,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 8, (2015) 083014, arXiv:1507.00680 [gr-qc].
  27. B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, S. Mojica, and E. Radu, “Spinning black holes in Einstein–Gauss-Bonnet–dilaton theory: Nonperturbative solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 4, (2016) 044047, arXiv:1511.05513 [gr-qc].
  28. K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, “Analytical approximation for the Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet black hole metric,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 6, (2017) 064004, arXiv:1706.07460 [gr-qc].
  29. N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, “Dynamical Chern-Simons Modified Gravity. I. Spinning Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084043, arXiv:0902.4669 [gr-qc].
  30. K. Yagi, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka, “Slowly Rotating Black Holes in Dynamical Chern-Simons Gravity: Deformation Quadratic in the Spin,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 044037, arXiv:1206.6130 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 049902 (2014)].
  31. R. McNees, L. C. Stein, and N. Yunes, “Extremal black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 23, (2016) 235013, arXiv:1512.05453 [gr-qc].
  32. T. Delsate, C. Herdeiro, and E. Radu, “Non-perturbative spinning black holes in dynamical Chern–Simons gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 787 (2018) 8–15, arXiv:1806.06700 [gr-qc].
  33. A. Sen, “Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1006–1009, arXiv:hep-th/9204046.
  34. S. Vigeland, N. Yunes, and L. Stein, “Bumpy Black Holes in Alternate Theories of Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 104027, arXiv:1102.3706 [gr-qc].
  35. T. Johannsen, “Regular Black Hole Metric with Three Constants of Motion,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 4, (2013) 044002, arXiv:1501.02809 [gr-qc].
  36. R. Konoplya, L. Rezzolla, and A. Zhidenko, “General parametrization of axisymmetric black holes in metric theories of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 6, (2016) 064015, arXiv:1602.02378 [gr-qc].
  37. G. O. Papadopoulos and K. D. Kokkotas, “Preserving Kerr symmetries in deformed spacetimes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35 no. 18, (2018) 185014, arXiv:1807.08594 [gr-qc].
  38. Z. Carson and K. Yagi, “Asymptotically flat, parameterized black hole metric preserving Kerr symmetries,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 8, (2020) 084030, arXiv:2002.01028 [gr-qc].
  39. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “General black-hole metric mimicking Schwarzschild spacetime,” JCAP 08 (2023) 008, arXiv:2303.03130 [gr-qc].
  40. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, “A Metric for Rapidly Spinning Black Holes Suitable for Strong-Field Tests of the No-Hair Theorem,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124015, arXiv:1105.3191 [gr-qc].
  41. C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,” Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4, arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc].
  42. LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 10, (2019) 104036, arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc].
  43. S.-J. Zhang, B. Wang, A. Wang, and J. F. Saavedra, “Object picture of scalar field perturbation on Kerr black hole in scalar-Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 12, (2020) 124056, arXiv:2010.05092 [gr-qc].
  44. W. Krivan, P. Laguna, and P. Papadopoulos, “Dynamics of scalar fields in the background of rotating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 4728–4734, arXiv:gr-qc/9606003.
  45. E. Pazos-Avalos and C. O. Lousto, “Numerical integration of the Teukolsky equation in the time domain,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 084022, arXiv:gr-qc/0409065.
  46. S. R. Dolan, L. Barack, and B. Wardell, “Self force via m𝑚mitalic_m-mode regularization and 2+1D evolution: II. Scalar-field implementation on Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 084001, arXiv:1107.0012 [gr-qc].
  47. D. D. Doneva, L. G. Collodel, C. J. Krüger, and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Black hole scalarization induced by the spin: 2+1 time evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 10, (2020) 104027, arXiv:2008.07391 [gr-qc].
  48. D. D. Doneva, L. G. Collodel, C. J. Krüger, and S. S. Yazadjiev, “Spin-induced scalarization of Kerr black holes with a massive scalar field,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 12, (2020) 1205, arXiv:2009.03774 [gr-qc].
  49. D. Psaltis, “Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum,” Living Rev. Rel. 11 (2008) 9, arXiv:0806.1531 [astro-ph].
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free