Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quadratic speed-ups in quantum kernelized binary classification

Published 26 Mar 2024 in quant-ph | (2403.17453v1)

Abstract: Classification is at the core of data-driven prediction and decision-making, representing a fundamental task in supervised machine learning. Recently, several quantum machine learning algorithms that use quantum kernels as a measure of similarities between data have emerged to perform binary classification on datasets encoded as quantum states. The potential advantages of quantum kernels arise from the ability of quantum computers to construct kernels that are more effective than their classical counterparts in capturing patterns in data or computing kernels more efficiently. However, existing quantum kernel-based classification algorithms do not harness the capability of having data samples in quantum superposition for additional enhancements. In this work, we demonstrate how such capability can be leveraged in quantum kernelized binary classifiers (QKCs) through Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) for quadratic speed-up. Additionally, we propose new quantum circuits for the QKCs in which the number of qubits is reduced by one, and the circuit depth is reduced linearly with respect to the number of sample data. We verify the quadratic speed-up over previous methods through numerical simulations on the Iris dataset.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, p. 150502, Oct 2009.
  2. P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum support vector machine for big data classification,” Physical review letters, vol. 113, no. 13, p. 130503, 2014.
  3. S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, “Quantum principal component analysis,” Nature Physics, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 631–633, 2014.
  4. A. Montanaro, “Quantum speedup of monte carlo methods,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 471, no. 2181, p. 20150301, 2015.
  5. M. Schuld and N. Killoran, “Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces,” Physical review letters, vol. 122, no. 4, p. 040504, 2019.
  6. V. Havlíček, A. D. Córcoles, K. Temme, A. W. Harrow, A. Kandala, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, “Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces,” Nature, vol. 567, no. 7747, pp. 209–212, 2019.
  7. Y. Liu, S. Arunachalam, and K. Temme, “A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learning,” Nature Physics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1013–1017, 2021.
  8. F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature, vol. 574, no. 7779, pp. 505–510, 2019.
  9. M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, “Variational quantum algorithms,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 625–644, 2021.
  10. P. Wittek, Quantum machine learning: what quantum computing means to data mining. Academic Press, 2014.
  11. M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, “An introduction to quantum machine learning,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 172–185, 2015.
  12. J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, “Quantum machine learning,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7671, pp. 195–202, 2017.
  13. Y. Zhang and Q. Ni, “Recent advances in quantum machine learning,” Quantum Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e34, 2020.
  14. R. Mengoni and A. Di Pierro, “Kernel methods in quantum machine learning,” Quantum Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 3-4, pp. 65–71, 2019.
  15. M. Schuld and F. Petruccione, “Quantum models as kernel methods,” Machine Learning with Quantum Computers, pp. 217–245, 2021.
  16. T. Hofmann, B. Schölkopf, and A. J. Smola, “Kernel methods in machine learning,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 36, pp. 1171–1220, 6 2008.
  17. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. De Wolf, “Quantum fingerprinting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 16, p. 167902, 2001.
  18. D. Aharonov, V. Jones, and Z. Landau, “A polynomial quantum algorithm for approximating the jones polynomial,” in Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 427–436, 2006.
  19. M. Schuld, M. Fingerhuth, and F. Petruccione, “Implementing a distance-based classifier with a quantum interference circuit,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 119, no. 6, p. 60002, 2017.
  20. C. Blank, D. K. Park, J.-K. K. Rhee, and F. Petruccione, “Quantum classifier with tailored quantum kernel,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 41, 2020.
  21. D. K. Park, C. Blank, and F. Petruccione, “The theory of the quantum kernel-based binary classifier,” Physics Letters A, vol. 384, no. 21, p. 126422, 2020.
  22. C. Blank, A. J. da Silva, L. P. de Albuquerque, F. Petruccione, and D. K. Park, “Compact quantum kernel-based binary classifier,” Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 7, p. 045007, jul 2022.
  23. S. M. Pillay, I. Sinayskiy, E. Jembere, and F. Petruccione, “A multi-class quantum kernel-based classifier,” Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2300249, 2024.
  24. N. M. de Oliveira, D. K. Park, I. F. Araujo, and A. J. da Silva, “Quantum variational distance-based centroid classifier,” Neurocomputing, vol. 576, p. 127356, 2024.
  25. G. Brassard, P. Hoyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp, “Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation,” Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 305, pp. 53–74, 2002.
  26. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
  27. H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, M. Mohseni, R. Babbush, S. Boixo, H. Neven, and J. R. McClean, “Power of data in quantum machine learning,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2631, 2021.
  28. Y. Suzuki, S. Uno, R. Raymond, T. Tanaka, T. Onodera, and N. Yamamoto, “Amplitude estimation without phase estimation,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, pp. 1–17, 2020.
  29. D. Grinko, J. Gacon, C. Zoufal, and S. Woerner, “Iterative quantum amplitude estimation,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 52, 2021.
  30. M. Cerezo, G. Verdon, H.-Y. Huang, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, “Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning,” Nature Computational Science, pp. 1–10, 2022.
  31. T. Hur, I. F. Araujo, and D. K. Park, “Neural quantum embedding: Pushing the limits of quantum supervised learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11412, 2023.
  32. R. LaRose and B. Coyle, “Robust data encodings for quantum classifiers,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 102, p. 032420, Sep 2020.
  33. M. Schuld, A. Bocharov, K. M. Svore, and N. Wiebe, “Circuit-centric quantum classifiers,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 101, p. 032308, Mar 2020.
  34. T. M. L. Veras, I. C. S. De Araujo, K. D. Park, and A. J. da Silva, “Circuit-based quantum random access memory for classical data with continuous amplitudes,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, pp. 1–1, 2020.
  35. I. F. Araujo, D. K. Park, F. Petruccione, and A. J. da Silva, “A divide-and-conquer algorithm for quantum state preparation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 6329, Mar. 2021.
  36. I. F. Araujo, D. K. Park, T. B. Ludermir, W. R. Oliveira, F. Petruccione, and A. J. Da Silva, “Configurable sublinear circuits for quantum state preparation,” Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 123, 2023.
  37. D. R. Simon, “On the power of quantum computation,” SIAM journal on computing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1474–1483, 1997.
  38. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  39. A. J. Da Silva and D. K. Park, “Linear-depth quantum circuits for multiqubit controlled gates,” Physical Review A, vol. 106, no. 4, p. 042602, 2022.
  40. K. Nakaji, “Faster amplitude estimation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.02417, 2020.
  41. P. Intallura, G. Korpas, S. Chakraborty, V. Kungurtsev, and J. Marecek, “A survey of quantum alternatives to randomized algorithms: Monte carlo integration and beyond,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04945, 2023.
  42. L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search,” in Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 212–219, 1996.
  43. M. Mottonen, J. J. Vartiainen, V. Bergholm, and M. M. Salomaa, “Transformation of quantum states using uniformly controlled rotations,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0407010, 2004.
  44. V. Bergholm, J. J. Vartiainen, M. Möttönen, and M. M. Salomaa, “Quantum circuits with uniformly controlled one-qubit gates,” Physical Review A, vol. 71, no. 5, p. 052330, 2005.
  45. D. Gottesman, “Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation,” Physical Review A, vol. 57, no. 1, p. 127, 1998.
  46. A. Manzano, D. Musso, and Á. Leitao, “Real quantum amplitude estimation,” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2023.
  47. R. Giuntini, F. Holik, D. K. Park, H. Freytes, C. Blank, and G. Sergioli, “Quantum-inspired algorithm for direct multi-class classification,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 134, p. 109956, 2023.
  48. S. Suthaharan and S. Suthaharan, “Support vector machine,” Machine learning models and algorithms for big data classification: thinking with examples for effective learning, pp. 207–235, 2016.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.