Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Infrastructure-less Localization from Indoor Environmental Sounds Based on Spectral Decomposition and Spatial Likelihood Model

Published 26 Mar 2024 in eess.AS and cs.SD | (2403.17402v1)

Abstract: Human and/or asset tracking using an attached sensor units helps understand their activities. Most common indoor localization methods for human tracking technologies require expensive infrastructures, deployment and maintenance. To overcome this problem, environmental sounds have been used for infrastructure-free localization. While they achieve room-level classification, they suffer from two problems: low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) condition and non-uniqueness of sound over the coverage area. A microphone localization method was proposed using supervised spectral decomposition and spatial likelihood to solve these problems. The proposed method was evaluated with actual recordings in an experimental room with a size of 12 x 30 m. The results showed that the proposed method with supervised NMF was robust under low-SNR condition compared to a simple feature (mel frequency cepstrum coefficient: MFCC). Additionally, the proposed method could be easily integrated with prior distribution, which is available from other Bayesian localizations. The proposed method can be used to evaluate the spatial likelihood from environmental sounds.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. C. Févotte et al., “Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with the Itakura-Saito Divergence: With Application to Music Analysis,” Neural computation, vol. 21, pp. 793–830, 2008.
  2. P. Bahl et al., “RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2000, pp. 775–784.
  3. M. Murata et al., “Smartphone-based Indoor Localization for Blind Navigation across Building Complexes,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2018, pp. 1–10.
  4. K. Urano et al., “An End-to-End BLE Indoor Localization Method Using LSTM,” Journal of Information Processing, vol. 29, pp. 58–69, 2021.
  5. M. Murata et al., “Smartphone-based localization for blind navigation in building-scale indoor environments,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 57, pp. 14–32, 2019.
  6. J. Urena et al., “Acoustic Local Positioning With Encoded Emission Beacons,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1042–1062, 2018.
  7. S. Ogiso, “Robust acoustic localization in a reverberant environment for synchronous and asynchronous beacons,” in Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, 2021, pp. 1–29.
  8. C. Campos et al., “Orb-slam3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual–inertial, and multimap slam,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1874–1890, 2021.
  9. M. Labbé et al., “RTAB-Map as an open-source lidar and visual simultaneous localization and mapping library for large-scale and long-term online operation,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 416–446, 2019.
  10. H. Xie et al., “MaLoc: a practical magnetic fingerprinting approach to indoor localization using smartphones,” in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2014, pp. 243–253.
  11. M. Kourogi et al., “Personal positioning based on walking locomotion analysis with self-contained sensors and a wearable camera,” in Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003, pp. 103–112.
  12. E. Foxlin, “Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 38–46, 2005.
  13. T. Yang et al., “A Survey of Recent Indoor Localization Scenarios and Methodologies,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 23, p. 8086, 2021.
  14. H.-S. Kim et al., “Indoor Positioning System Using Magnetic Field Map Navigation and an Encoder System,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2017.
  15. C. Evers et al., “Acoustic SLAM,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1484–1498, 2018.
  16. N. R. Rypkema et al., “Passive Inverted Ultra-Short Baseline (piUSBL) Localization: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2019, pp. 7197–7204.
  17. S. Ogiso et al., “Robust Indoor Localization in a Reverberant Environment Using Microphone Pairs and Asynchronous Acoustic Beacons,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 123 116–123 127, 2019.
  18. M. Azizyan et al., “SurroundSense: mobile phone localization using ambient sound and light,” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2009.
  19. S. P. Tarzia et al., “Indoor localization without infrastructure using the acoustic background spectrum,” in Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, 2011, pp. 155–168.
  20. K. Aono et al., “Infrasonic scene fingerprinting for authenticating speaker location,” in Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2017, pp. 361–365.
  21. R. Leonardo et al., “A Framework for Infrastructure-Free Indoor Localization Based on Pervasive Sound Analysis,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 4136–4144, 2018.
  22. V. Bisot et al., “Supervised nonnegative matrix factorization for acoustic scene classification,” in DCASE, 2016, pp. 1–5.
  23. C. E. Rasmussen, “Gaussian processes in machine learning,” in Summer school on machine learning.   Springer, 2003, pp. 63–71.
  24. H. Purohit et al., “MIMII Dataset: Sound Dataset for Malfunctioning Industrial Machine Investigation and Inspection,” in 4th Workshop on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE), 2019, pp. 209–213.
  25. R. Ichikari et al., “Off-Site Indoor Localization Competitions Based on Measured Data in a Warehouse,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2019.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.