Energy control in a quantum oscillator using coherent control and engineered environment
Abstract: We develop and analyze a new method for manipulation of energy in a quantum harmonic oscillator using coherent, e.g., electromagnetic, field and incoherent control. Coherent control is typically implemented by shaped laser pulse or tailored electromagnetic field. Incoherent control is implemented by engineered environment, whose mean number of excitations at the frequency of the oscillator is used as a control variable. An approach to coherent and incoherent controls design based on the speed gradient algorithms in general, finite and differential forms is proposed. It is proved that the differential form is able to completely manipulate the energy of the oscillator: an arbitrary energy can be achieved starting from any initial state of the oscillator. The key instrument which allows for complete energy manipulation in this case is the use of the engineered environment. A robustified speed-gradient control algorithm in differential form is also proposed. It is shown that the proposed robustified control algorithm ensures exponential stability of the closed loop system which is preserved for sampled-data control.
- Rice S.A. and Zhao M. (2000). Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics. New York: Wiley.
- Brumer P.W. and Shapiro M. (2003). Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes. Wiley-Interscience.
- Tannor D.J. (2007). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: A Time Dependent Perspective. Sausalito: University Science Press.
- Fradkov A.L. (2007). Cybernetical Physics: From Control of Chaos to Quantum Control. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Wiseman H.M. and Milburn G.M. Quantum Measurement and Control. (2010). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Lyakhov K.A. and Pechen A.N. (2020). CO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT laser system design for efficient boron isotope separation by the method of selective laser-assisted retardation of condensation. Applied Physics B 126, 141.
- Krotov V.F. (2009). Control of the quantum systems and some ideas of the optimal control theory. Automation and Remote Control 70, 357–365.
- Cong S. and Meng F. (2013). A survey of quantum Lyapunov control methods. The Scientific World Journal 2013, 967529.
- Hentschel A. and Sanders B.C. (2011). Machine learning was used to generate autonomous adaptive feedback schemes for quantum information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 233601.
- Anan’evskii M.S. and Fradkov A.L. (2005). Control of the observables in the finite-level quantum systems. Automation and Remote Control 66, 734–745.
- Pechen A. and Borisenok S. (2015). Energy transfer in two-level quantum systems via speed gradient-based algorithm. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48-11, 446–450.
- Judson R.S. and Rabitz H. (1992). Teaching lasers to control molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1500.
- Pechen A. and Rabitz H. (2006). Teaching the environment to control quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062102.
- Andreev A. (2019). Hyperchaos and its control in two-level quantum oscillators lattice. Cybernetics and Physics 8(3), 93–97.
- Whaley B. and Milburn G. (2015). Focus on coherent control of complex quantum systems. New Journal of Physics 17, 100202.
- Andrievsky B.R. and Fradkov A.L. (2021). Speed gradient method and its applications. Automation and Remote Control 82:9, 1463–-1518.
- Bøorkje K. (2014). Scheme for steady-state preparation of a harmonic oscillator in the first excited state. Phys. Rev. A 90, 023806.
- Pechen A. (2011). Engineering arbitrary pure and mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042106.
-  Morzhin O.V. and Pechen A.N. (2021). Generation of density matrices for two qubits using coherent and incoherent controls. Lobachevskii J. Math. 42:10, 2401–2412.
- Petruhanov V.N. and Pechen A.N. (2022). Optimal control for state preparation in two-qubit open quantum systems driven by coherent and incoherent controls via GRAPE approach. International Journal of Modern Physics A 37:20–21, 2243017.
- Breuer H.-P. and Petruccione F. (2002). The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Balachandran A.P. and Roy S.M. (2000). Quantum anti-Zeno paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4019–4022.
- Facchi P. and Pascazio S. (2001). Quantum Zeno and inverse quantum Zeno effects. Prog. Opt. 42, 147–217.
- Dong D. and Petersen I.R. (2012). Sliding mode control of two-level quantum systems. Automatica 48(5), 725–735.
- Lucas F. and Hornberger K. (2014). Incoherent control of the retinal isomerization in rhodopsin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 058301.
- Pechen A.N. and Trushechkin A.S. (2015). Measurement-assisted Landau-Zener transitions. Phys. Rev. A 91:5, 052316.
- Derevitsky D.P. and Fradkov A.L. (1981). Applied Theory Of Discrete Time Adaptive Control Systems. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
- Dragan V. and Khalanai A. (1990). Preserving exponential stability In discrete control systems with adaptive stabilization. Siberian Mathematical Journal 31:6, 1046–1050.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.