Gravitational waves from domain wall collapses and dark matter in the SM with a complex scalar
Abstract: We study domain wall induced by spontaneously broken $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry and its gravitational wave signature in the standard model with a complex scalar in connection with dark matter physics. In a minimal setup, a linear term of the singlet field is added to the scalar potential as an explicit $\mathbb{Z}_2$ breaking term to make the domain wall unstable. We obtain its minimal size from cosmological constraints and show that the parameter space that can be probed by current and future pulsar time array experiments requires the vacuum expectation value of the singlet field to be greater than $\mathcal{O}(10-100)$ TeV, along with a singlet-like Higgs mass of $\mathcal{O}(1-100)$ TeV. However, such a region is severely restricted by the dark matter relic density, which places an upper bound on the singlet vacuum expectation value at approximately 200 TeV, and limits the dark matter mass to about half of the singlet-like Higgs boson mass.
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex] .
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex] .
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L8 (2023a), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE] .
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L9 (2023b), arXiv:2306.16217 [astro-ph.HE] .
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L10 (2023c), arXiv:2306.16218 [astro-ph.HE] .
- A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE] .
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 952, L37 (2023d), arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE] .
- G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 956, L3 (2023e), arXiv:2306.16221 [astro-ph.HE] .
- A. D. Johnson et al. (NANOGrav),  (2023), arXiv:2306.16223 [astro-ph.HE] .
- J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE] .
- D. J. Reardon et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE] .
- H. Xu et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE] .
- B.-Q. Lu and C.-W. Chiang,  (2023), arXiv:2307.00746 [hep-ph] .
- S.-P. Li and K.-P. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055018 (2023), arXiv:2307.01086 [hep-ph] .
- V. A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 166, 493 (1996), [Phys. Usp.39,461(1996)], arXiv:hep-ph/9603208 [hep-ph] .
- K. Funakubo, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 475 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9608358 [hep-ph] .
- M. Trodden, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1463 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9803479 [hep-ph] .
- D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, New J. Phys. 14, 125003 (2012), arXiv:1206.2942 [hep-ph] .
- T. Konstandin, Phys. Usp. 56, 747 (2013), [Usp. Fiz. Nauk183,785(2013)], arXiv:1302.6713 [hep-ph] .
- E. Senaha, Symmetry 12, 733 (2020).
- B. Grzadkowski and D. Huang, JHEP 08, 135 (2018), arXiv:1807.06987 [hep-ph] .
- G. Janssen et al., PoS AASKA14, 037 (2015), arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM] .
- Nature 607, 52 (2022), [Erratum: Nature 612, E24 (2022)], arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex] .
- A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS), Nature 607, 60 (2022), arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex] .
- G. H. Derrick, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1252 (1964).
- E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe, Vol. 69 (1990).
- K. Saikawa, Universe 3, 40 (2017), arXiv:1703.02576 [hep-ph] .
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] .
- J. Aalbers et al. (LZ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex] .
- J. R. Andersen et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group),  (2013), 10.5170/CERN-2013-004, arXiv:1307.1347 [hep-ph] .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.