Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Searches for CEνNS and Physics beyond the Standard Model using Skipper-CCDs at CONNIE

Published 24 Mar 2024 in hep-ex and physics.ins-det | (2403.15976v1)

Abstract: The Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE) aims to detect the coherent scattering (CE$\nu$NS) of reactor antineutrinos off silicon nuclei using thick fully-depleted high-resistivity silicon CCDs. Two Skipper-CCD sensors with sub-electron readout noise capability were installed at the experiment next to the Angra-2 reactor in 2021, making CONNIE the first experiment to employ Skipper-CCDs for reactor neutrino detection. We report on the performance of the Skipper-CCDs, the new data processing and data quality selection techniques and the event selection for CE$\nu$NS interactions, which enable CONNIE to reach a record low detection threshold of 15 eV. The data were collected over 300 days in 2021-2022 and correspond to exposures of 14.9 g-days with the reactor-on and 3.5 g-days with the reactor-off. The difference between the reactor-on and off event rates shows no excess and yields upper limits at 95% confidence level for the neutrino interaction rates comparable with previous CONNIE limits from standard CCDs and higher exposures. Searches for new neutrino interactions beyond the Standard Model were performed, yielding an improvement on the previous CONNIE limit on a simplified model with light vector mediators. A first dark matter (DM) search by diurnal modulation was performed by CONNIE and the results represent the best limits on the DM-electron scattering cross-section, obtained by a surface-level experiment. These promising results, obtained using a very small-mass sensor, illustrate the potential of Skipper-CCDs to probe rare neutrino interactions and motivate the plans to increase the detector mass in the near future.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (63)
  1. D. Z. Freedman, Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389 (1974).
  2. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Science 357, 1123 (2017), arXiv:1708.01294 [nucl-ex] .
  3. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 012002 (2021), arXiv:2003.10630 [nucl-ex] .
  4. D. Akimov et al. (COHERENT), Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 081801 (2022a), arXiv:2110.07730 [hep-ex] .
  5. Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report, Vol. 2 (2019) arXiv:1907.00991 [hep-ph] .
  6. D. K. Papoulias et al., Recent probes of standard and non-standard neutrino physics with nuclei, Front. in Phys. 7, 191 (2019), arXiv:1911.00916 [hep-ph] .
  7. M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interactions, JHEP 03, 097, arXiv:1612.04150 [hep-ph] .
  8. Y. Farzan et al., Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering, JHEP 05, 066, arXiv:1802.05171 [hep-ph] .
  9. A. Parada, Constraints on neutrino electric millicharge from experiments of elastic neutrino-electron interaction and future experimental proposals involving coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020, 5908904 (2020), arXiv:1907.04942 [hep-ph] .
  10. O. G. Miranda et al., Probing neutrino transition magnetic moments with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, JHEP 07, 103, arXiv:1905.03750 [hep-ph] .
  11. R. Harnik, J. Kopp, and P. A. N. Machado, Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors, JCAP 07, 026, arXiv:1202.6073 [hep-ph] .
  12. M. Hoferichter, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: EFT analysis and nuclear responses, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074018 (2020), arXiv:2007.08529 [hep-ph] .
  13. D. Z. Freedman, D. N. Schramm, and D. L. Tubbs, The Weak Neutral Current and Its Effects in Stellar Collapse, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 27, 167 (1977).
  14. H.-T. Janka, Neutrino emission from supernovae, in Handbook of Supernovae (Springer International Publishing, 2017) pp. 1575–1604.
  15. J. Monroe and P. Fisher, Neutrino Backgrounds to Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D 76, 033007 (2007), arXiv:0706.3019 [astro-ph] .
  16. A. Gutlein et al., Solar and atmospheric neutrinos: Background sources for the direct dark matter search, Astropart. Phys. 34, 90 (2010), arXiv:1003.5530 [hep-ph] .
  17. M. Bowen and P. Huber, Reactor neutrino applications and coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 102, 053008 (2020), arXiv:2005.10907 [physics.ins-det] .
  18. B. K. Cogswell, A. Goel, and P. Huber, Passive Low-Energy Nuclear-Recoil Detection with Color Centers, Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 064060 (2021), arXiv:2104.13926 [physics.ins-det] .
  19. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CCM), First dark matter search results from Coherent CAPTAIN-Mills, Phys. Rev. D 106, 012001 (2022a), arXiv:2105.14020 [hep-ex] .
  20. D. Baxter et al., Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source, JHEP 02, 123, arXiv:1911.00762 [physics.ins-det] .
  21. H. Bonet et al. (CONUS), Constraints on elastic neutrino nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime from the CONUS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041804 (2021), arXiv:2011.00210 [hep-ex] .
  22. I. Alekseev et al. (ν𝜈\nuitalic_νGeN), First results of the ν𝜈\nuitalic_νGeN experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 106, L051101 (2022), arXiv:2205.04305 [nucl-ex] .
  23. L. Singh et al. (TEXONO), Constraints on millicharged particles with low threshold germanium detectors at Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 032009 (2019), arXiv:1808.02719 [hep-ph] .
  24. D. Y. Akimov et al., The RED-100 experiment, JINST 17 (11), T11011, arXiv:2209.15516 [physics.ins-det] .
  25. J. J. Choi et al. (NEON), Exploring coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering using reactor electron antineutrinos in the NEON experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 226 (2023), arXiv:2204.06318 [hep-ex] .
  26. G. Agnolet et al. (MINER), Background Studies for the MINER Coherent Neutrino Scattering Reactor Experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 853, 53 (2017), arXiv:1609.02066 [physics.ins-det] .
  27. G. Angloher et al. (NUCLEUS), Exploring CE⁢ν⁢NSCE𝜈NS\hbox{CE}\nu\hbox{NS}CE italic_ν NS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1018 (2019), arXiv:1905.10258 [physics.ins-det] .
  28. C. Augier et al. (Ricochet), Results from a prototype TES detector for the Ricochet experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1057, 168765 (2023), arXiv:2304.14926 [physics.ins-det] .
  29. E. Depaoli et al., Deployment and performance of a Low-Energy-Threshold Skipper-CCD inside a nuclear reactor,   (2024), arXiv:2401.07885 [hep-ex] .
  30. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE), Exploring low-energy neutrino physics with the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 100, 092005 (2019), arXiv:1906.02200 [physics.ins-det] .
  31. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE), Results of the Engineering Run of the Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE), JINST 11 (07), P07024, arXiv:1604.01343 [physics.ins-det] .
  32. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE), Search for light mediators in the low-energy data of the CONNIE reactor neutrino experiment, JHEP 04, 054, arXiv:1910.04951 [hep-ex] .
  33. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (CONNIE), Search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor with CONNIE 2019 data, JHEP 05, 017, arXiv:2110.13033 [hep-ex] .
  34. N. Castelló-Mor (DAMIC-M), DAMIC-M Experiment: Thick, Silicon CCDs to search for Light Dark Matter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 958, 162933 (2020), arXiv:2001.01476 [physics.ins-det] .
  35. B. A. Cervantes-Vergara et al. (Oscura), Skipper-CCD sensors for the Oscura experiment: requirements and preliminary tests, JINST 18 (08), P08016, arXiv:2304.04401 [physics.ins-det] .
  36. E. M. Villalpando et al., Design of a Skipper CCD Focal Plane for the SOAR Integral Field Spectrograph (2022), arXiv:2210.03665 [astro-ph.IM] .
  37. D. Rodrigues et al., Absolute measurement of the Fano factor using a Skipper-CCD, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1010, 165511 (2021), arXiv:2004.11499 [physics.ins-det] .
  38. A. M. Botti et al., Constraints on the electron-hole pair creation energy and Fano factor below 150 eV from Compton scattering in a skipper CCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 072005 (2022), arXiv:2202.03924 [physics.ins-det] .
  39. G. I. Cancelo et al., Low Threshold Acquisition controller for Skipper CCDs, J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 7, 015001 (2021), arXiv:2004.07599 [astro-ph.IM] .
  40. M. Sofo Haro, G. Fernandez Moroni, and J. Tiffenberg, Studies on small charge packet transport in high-resistivity fully-depleted CCDs, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 67, 1993 (2020), arXiv:1906.11379 [physics.ins-det] .
  41. L. Barak et al. (SENSEI), SENSEI: Characterization of Single-Electron Events Using a Skipper Charge-Coupled Device, Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 014022 (2022), arXiv:2106.08347 [physics.ins-det] .
  42. J. Janesick, Scientific Charge-coupled Devices, Press Monograph Series (Society of Photo Optical, 2001).
  43. W. E. Ang, S. Prasad, and R. Mahapatra, Coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scatter response of semiconductor detectors to nuclear reactor antineutrinos, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1004, 165342 (2021).
  44. W. E. Ang, S. Prasad, and S. S. Chirayath, Antineutrino detection for temporal monitoring of fuel burnup in a large nuclear reactor, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1028, 166353 (2022).
  45. Y. Sarkis, A. Aguilar-Arevalo, and J. C. D’Olivo, Ionization efficiency for nuclear recoils in silicon from about 50 eV to 3 MeV, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062811 (2023), arXiv:2209.04503 [physics.atom-ph] .
  46. A. E. Chavarria et al., Measurement of the ionization produced by sub-keV silicon nuclear recoils in a CCD dark matter detector, Phys. Rev. D 94, 082007 (2016), arXiv:1608.00957 [astro-ph.IM] .
  47. R. Barlow, Asymmetric errors, eConf C030908, WEMT002 (2003), arXiv:physics/0401042 .
  48. R. Barlow, Asymmetric statistical errors, in PHYSTAT (2005): Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology (2004) pp. 56–59, arXiv:physics/0406120 .
  49. D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty, and K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115016 (2009), arXiv:0901.4117 [hep-ph] .
  50. P. Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z′superscript𝑍′Z^{\prime}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009), arXiv:0801.1345 [hep-ph] .
  51. C. Giunti and A. Studenikin, Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 531 (2015), arXiv:1403.6344 [hep-ph] .
  52. E. Morgante, Simplified Dark Matter Models, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 5012043 (2018), arXiv:1804.01245 [hep-ph] .
  53. L. Barak et al. (SENSEI), SENSEI: Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a New Skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020), arXiv:2004.11378 [astro-ph.CO] .
  54. I. Arnquist et al. (DAMIC-M), Search for Daily Modulation of MeV Dark Matter Signals with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 101006 (2024), arXiv:2307.07251 [hep-ex] .
  55. I. Arnquist et al. (DAMIC-M), First Constraints from DAMIC-M on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Particles Interacting with Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 171003 (2023), arXiv:2302.02372 [hep-ex] .
  56. X. Bertou et al., Earth-Scattering Induced Modulation in Low-Threshold Dark Matter Experiments, in XVIII International Conference on Topics in Astoparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP2023) (Vienna, Austria, 2023).
  57. T. Emken and C. Kouvaris, DaMaSCUS: The Impact of Underground Scatterings on Direct Detection of Light Dark Matter, JCAP 10, 031, arXiv:1706.02249 [hep-ph] .
  58. T. Emken and C. Kouvaris, DaMaSCUS: Dark Matter Simulation Code for Underground Scatterings, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1706.003 (2017).
  59. P. Galison and A. Manohar, TWO Z’s OR NOT TWO Z’s?, Phys. Lett. B 136, 279 (1984).
  60. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166, 196 (1986).
  61. P. Huber, Determination of antineutrino spectra from nuclear reactors, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).
  62. H. T. Wong et al. (TEXONO), A Search of Neutrino Magnetic Moments with a High-Purity Germanium Detector at the Kuo-Sheng Nuclear Power Station, Phys. Rev. D 75, 012001 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0605006 .
  63. M. F. Albakry et al. (SuperCDMS), First Measurement of the Nuclear-Recoil Ionization Yield in Silicon at 100 eV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091801 (2023), arXiv:2303.02196 [physics.ins-det] .
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free