Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

PeerGPT: Probing the Roles of LLM-based Peer Agents as Team Moderators and Participants in Children's Collaborative Learning

Published 21 Mar 2024 in cs.HC and cs.AI | (2403.14227v1)

Abstract: In children's collaborative learning, effective peer conversations can significantly enhance the quality of children's collaborative interactions. The integration of LLM agents into this setting explores their novel role as peers, assessing impacts as team moderators and participants. We invited two groups of participants to engage in a collaborative learning workshop, where they discussed and proposed conceptual solutions to a design problem. The peer conversation transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. We discovered that peer agents, while managing discussions effectively as team moderators, sometimes have their instructions disregarded. As participants, they foster children's creative thinking but may not consistently provide timely feedback. These findings highlight potential design improvements and considerations for peer agents in both roles.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Communicative and social consequences of interactions with voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior 112 (Nov. 2020), 106466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106466
  2. Linda Allal and Greta Pelgrims Ducrey. 2000. Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction 10, 2 (2000), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00025-0
  3. D. V. Bishop. 1998. Development of the Children’s Communication Checklist (CCC): a method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 39, 6 (Sept. 1998), 879–891.
  4. Shoshana Blum-Kulka and Catherine E. Snow. 2004. Introduction: The Potential of Peer Talk. Discourse Studies 6, 3 (Aug. 2004), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604044290 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
  6. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165 arXiv:2005.14165 [cs].
  7. Courtney B. Cazden. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Technical Report. ISBN: 9780435084455 ERIC Number: ED288206.
  8. Designing a visualization tool for children to reflect on their collaborative dialogue. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 27 (2021), 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100232
  9. Visualizing Student Opinion Through Text Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Education 62, 4 (Nov. 2019), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2924385 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Education.
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling. IOS Press. Google-Books-ID: LRfvAgAAQBAJ.
  11. AI-Mediated Communication: Definition, Research Agenda, and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 25, 1 (01 2020), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/25/1/89/32961176/zmz022.pdf
  12. Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45, 1 (2004), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00308.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00308.x.
  13. Yugo Hayashi. 2020. Gaze awareness and metacognitive suggestions by a pedagogical conversational agent: an experimental investigation on interventions to support collaborative learning process and performance. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 15, 4 (Dec. 2020), 469–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09333-3
  14. Game-inspired Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Systematic Literature Review. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 15, 2 (June 2023), 146–192. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00187
  15. Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23, 3 (2007), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00210.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00210.x.
  16. Yanghee Kim and Amy L. Baylor. 2016. Research-Based Design of Pedagogical Agent Roles: a Review, Progress, and Recommendations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, 1 (March 2016), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0055-y
  17. Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies 28, 1 (Jan. 2023), 973–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
  18. Curiosity Notebook: The Design of a Research Platform for Learning by Teaching. 5, CSCW2, Article 394 (oct 2021), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479538
  19. Michael McTear. 1985. Children’s Conversation. B. Blackwell. Google-Books-ID: _rFgQgAACAAJ.
  20. Children’s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom. British Educational Research Journal 25, 1 (1999), 95–111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1501934 Publisher: [Wiley, BERA].
  21. Masahiko Minami. 1997. by Anato Ninio and Catherine E. Snow. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996, 222 pp. Issues in Applied Linguistics (June 1997). https://www.academia.edu/48540490/by_Anato_Ninio_and_Catherine_E_Snow_Boulder_CO_Westview_1996_222_pp
  22. Diana Pérez-Marín. 2021a. A Review of the Practical Applications of Pedagogic Conversational Agents to Be Used in School and University Classrooms. Digital 1, 1 (March 2021), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital1010002 Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  23. Diana Pérez-Marín. 2021b. A Review of the Practical Applications of Pedagogic Conversational Agents to Be Used in School and University Classrooms. Digital 1, 1 (March 2021), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital1010002 Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  24. Jennifer M. Langer-Osuna Randi A. Engle and Maxine McKinney de Royston. 2014. Toward a Model of Influence in Persuasive Discussions: Negotiating Quality, Authority, Privilege, and Access Within a Student-Led Argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 2 (2014), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
  25. Peer-Assisted Learning Interventions With Elementary School Students: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (06 2003), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240
  26. CoCo: Collaboration Coach for Understanding Team Dynamics during Video Conferencing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 4, Article 160 (jan 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161186
  27. IntroBot: Exploring the Use of Chatbot-assisted Familiarization in Online Collaborative Groups (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 613, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580930
  28. Anat Ninio Snow, Catherine. 2019. Pragmatic Development. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429498053
  29. Juliane Stude. 2014. The acquisition of discourse competence: Evidence from preschoolers’ peer talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3, 2 (June 2014), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.006
  30. Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis. Current Anthropology 53, 6 (Dec. 2012), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207 Publisher: The University of Chicago Press.
  31. Young children working together. Cooperative learning effects on group work of children in Grade 1 of primary education. Learning and Instruction 67 (2020), 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101308
  32. James V. Wertsch. 1984. The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. New Directions for Child Development 23 (1984), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219842303 Place: US Publisher: Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc..
  33. Mathemyths: Leveraging Large Language Models to Teach Mathematical Language through Child-AI Co-Creative Storytelling. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642647 arXiv:2402.01927 [cs].
  34. UX Research on Conversational Human-AI Interaction: A Literature Review of the ACM Digital Library (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 570, 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501855
Citations (3)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.