Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Quadcopter Team Configurable Motion Guided by a Quadruped

Published 20 Mar 2024 in cs.RO | (2403.14029v1)

Abstract: The paper focuses on modeling and experimental evaluation of a quadcopter team configurable coordination guided by a single quadruped robot. We consider the quadcopter team as particles of a two-dimensional deformable body and propose a two-dimensional affine transformation model for safe and collision-free configurable coordination of this heterogeneous robotic system. The proposed affine transformation is decomposed into translation, that is specified by the quadruped global position, and configurable motion of the quadcopters, which is determined by a nonsingular Jacobian matrix so that the quadcopter team can safely navigate a constrained environment while avoiding collision. We propose two methods to experimentally evaluate the proposed heterogeneous robot coordination model. The first method measures real positions of quadcopters, quadruped, and environmental objects all with respect to the global coordinate system. On the other hand, the second method measures position with respect to the local coordinate system fixed on the dog robot which in turn enables safe planning the Jacobian matrix of the quadcopter team while the world is virtually approached the robotic system.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. A. Albanese, V. Sciancalepore, and X. Costa-Pérez, “Sardo: An automated search-and-rescue drone-based solution for victims localization,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3312–3325, 2022.
  2. F. L. Pereira, “Optimal control problems in drone operations for disaster search and rescue,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 186, pp. 78–86, 2021.
  3. H. Rastgoftar and E. M. Atkins, “Cooperative aerial lift and manipulation (calm),” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 82, pp. 105–118, 2018.
  4. J. P. Queralta, J. Taipalmaa, B. Can Pullinen, V. K. Sarker, T. Nguyen Gia, H. Tenhunen, M. Gabbouj, J. Raitoharju, and T. Westerlund, “Collaborative multi-robot search and rescue: Planning, coordination, perception, and active vision,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 191 617–191 643, 2020.
  5. I. Hughes, C. Cubillos, G. Lefranc, and G. Millán, “Colony of robots for exploration based on multi-agent system,” International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, vol. 9, pp. 703–710, 2014, publisher Copyright: © 2006-2014 by CCC Publications.
  6. P. Abichandani, K. Levin, and D. Bucci, “Decentralized formation coordination of multiple quadcopters under communication constraints,” in 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019, pp. 3326–3332.
  7. R. Carney, M. Chyba, C. Gray, G. Wilkens, and C. Shanbrom, “Multi-agent systems for quadcopters,” Journal of Geometric Mechanics, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/jgm.2021005
  8. L. Bai, J. Guan, X. Chen, J. Hou, and W. Duan, “An optional passive/active transformable wheel-legged mobility concept for search and rescue robots,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 107, pp. 145–155, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889018301891
  9. M. Eich, F. Grimminger, and F. Kirchner, “A versatile stair-climbing robot for search and rescue applications,” in 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics, 2008, pp. 35–40.
  10. A. J. Hunt, R. J. Bachmann, R. R. Murphy, and R. D. Quinn, “A rapidly reconfigurable robot for assistance in urban search and rescue,” in 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011, pp. 209–214.
  11. T. Rouček, M. Pecka, P. Čížek, T. Petříček, J. Bayer, V. Šalanský, D. Heřt, M. Petrlík, T. Báča, V. Spurný, F. Pomerleau, V. Kubelka, J. Faigl, K. Zimmermann, M. Saska, T. Svoboda, and T. Krajník, “Darpa subterranean challenge: Multi-robotic exploration of underground environments,” in Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems, J. Mazal, A. Fagiolini, and P. Vasik, Eds.   Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 274–290.
  12. H. Rastgoftar and I. V. Kolmanovsky, “A spatio-temporal reference trajectory planner approach to collision-free continuum deformation coordination,” Automatica, vol. 142, p. 110255, 2022.
  13. A. Saint-Jore, Y.-Q. Song, and L. Ciarletta, “Hmas: enabling seamless collaboration between drones, quadruped robots, and human operators with efficient spatial awareness,” in IEEE 21th International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), 2023.
  14. R. Thakker, N. Alatur, D. D. Fan, J. Tordesillas, M. Paton, K. Otsu, O. Toupet, and A.-a. Agha-mohammadi, “Autonomous off-road navigation over extreme terrains with perceptually-challenging conditions,” in Experimental Robotics: The 17th International Symposium.   Springer, 2021, pp. 161–173.
  15. J. Li, H. Qin, J. Wang, and J. Li, “Openstreetmap-based autonomous navigation for the four wheel-legged robot via 3d-lidar and ccd camera,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 2708–2717, 2021.
  16. A. Franchi, C. Secchi, M. Ryll, H. H. Bulthoff, and P. R. Giordano, “Shared control : Balancing autonomy and human assistance with a group of quadrotor uavs,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 57–68, 2012.
  17. L. Gomes, L. Leal, T. Oliveira, J. Cunha, and T. Revoredo, “Unmanned quadcopter control using a motion capture system,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 3606–3613, 2016.
  18. S. Al Habsi, M. Shehada, M. Abdoon, A. Mashood, and H. Noura, “Integration of a vicon camera system for indoor flight of a parrot ar drone,” in 2015 10th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications (ISMA), 2015, pp. 1–6.
  19. A. Daspan, A. Nimsongprasert, P. Srichai, and P. Wiengchanda, “Implementation of robot operating system in raspberry pi 4 for autonomous landing quadrotor on aruco marker,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, p. 210–215, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.12.4.210-215
  20. H. Rastgoftar, “Integration of a* search and classic optimal control for safe planning of continuum deformation of a multiquadcopter system,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 4119–4134, 2022.
  21. H. Uppaluru, M. Ghufran, A. E. Asslouj, and H. Rastgoftar, “Drones practicing mechanics,” in 2023 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2023, pp. 745–752.
  22. H. Rastgoftar, E. M. Atkins, and I. V. Kolmanovsky, “Scalable vehicle team continuum deformation coordination with eigen decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 2514–2521, 2022.
  23. OPT4SMART, “ros2-vicon-receiver,” https://github.com/OPT4SMART/ros2-vicon-receiver, 2023, accessed: 2024-02-25.
  24. A. Garlow, S. Kemp, K. Skinner, A. Mazumdar, and J. Rogers, “Robust autonomous landing of a quadcopter on a mobile vehicle using infrared beacons,” Autonomous VTOL Technical Meeting and Electric VTOL Symposium, 2023.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.