Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II $B^+\to K^+ +$ invisible measurement

Published 19 Mar 2024 in hep-ph | (2403.12485v2)

Abstract: Recently Belle II reported the first measurement of $B+\to K++{\rm invisible (inv)}$, which is $2.7\sigma$ above the standard model (SM) prediction. If confirmed, this calls for new physics beyond SM. In the SM, the invisible particles are neutrino-anti-neutrino pairs. There are more possibilities when going beyond the SM. In this work, we focus on decays to dark matter (DM) and show that the $B\to K +\mathrm{inv}$ excess from Belle II and DM relic density can be simultaneously explained in a simple extension of the SM. The model introduces a real scalar singlet $\phi$ acting as a DM candidate, and two heavy vector-like quarks $Q,D$ with the same quantum numbers as the SM left-handed quark doublet and right-handed down-type quark singlet, respectively. All these new particles are odd under a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry while the SM particles are even. The model can successfully explain the Belle II anomaly and DM relic density for TeV-scale heavy quarks with hierarchical Yukawa couplings involving $b$ and $s$ quarks. At the same time, it can easily satisfy other flavour physics constraints. Direct detection searches utilizing the Migdal effect constrain some of the parameter space.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Belle-II Collaboration, I. Adachi et al., “Evidence for B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG Decays,” arXiv:2311.14647 [hep-ex].
  2. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, “Revisiting B→K(*)⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\rightarrow K^{(*)}\nu{\bar{\nu}}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG decays in the Standard Model and beyond,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 3, (2023) 252, arXiv:2301.06990 [hep-ph].
  3. Belle-II Collaboration, F. Abudinén et al., “Search for B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG Decays Using an Inclusive Tagging Method at Belle II,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 18, (2021) 181802, arXiv:2104.12624 [hep-ex].
  4. Belle Collaboration, O. Lutz et al., “Search for B→h(*)⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵superscriptℎ𝜈¯𝜈B\to h^{(*)}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_h start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG with the full Belle Υ⁢(4⁢S)Υ4𝑆\Upsilon(4S)roman_Υ ( 4 italic_S ) data sample,” Phys. Rev. D 87 no. 11, (2013) 111103, arXiv:1303.3719 [hep-ex].
  5. Belle Collaboration, J. Grygier et al., “Search for 𝑩→𝒉⁢𝝂⁢𝝂¯bold-→𝑩𝒉𝝂bold-¯𝝂\boldsymbol{B\to h\nu\bar{\nu}}bold_italic_B bold_→ bold_italic_h bold_italic_ν overbold_¯ start_ARG bold_italic_ν end_ARG decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 9, (2017) 091101, arXiv:1702.03224 [hep-ex]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 099902 (2018)].
  6. BaBar Collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchez et al., “Search for the Rare Decay B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 112002, arXiv:1009.1529 [hep-ex].
  7. BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., “Search for B→K(*)⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K^{(*)}\nu\overline{\nu}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG and invisible quarkonium decays,” Phys. Rev. D 87 no. 11, (2013) 112005, arXiv:1303.7465 [hep-ex].
  8. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, “Implications of an enhanced B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG branching ratio,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 1, (2024) 015006, arXiv:2309.00075 [hep-ph].
  9. P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, “B meson anomalies and large B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈{B}^{+}\to{K}^{+}\nu\overline{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG in non-universal U⁢(1)′𝑈superscript1′U(1)^{\prime}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models,” JHEP 02 (2024) 121, arXiv:2308.13426 [hep-ph].
  10. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, “Understanding the first measurement of B(B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG),” Phys. Lett. B 848 (2024) 138411, arXiv:2309.02246 [hep-ph].
  11. Y. Amhis, M. Kenzie, M. Reboud, and A. R. Wiederhold, “Prospects for searches of b→s⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝑏𝑠𝜈¯𝜈b\to s\nu\overline{\nu}italic_b → italic_s italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG decays at FCC-ee,” JHEP 01 (2024) 144, arXiv:2309.11353 [hep-ex].
  12. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, “Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG in light of the new Belle II measurement,” arXiv:2309.12741 [hep-ph].
  13. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, “Flavor anomalies in leptoquark model with gauged U⁢(1)Lμ−Lτ𝑈subscript1subscript𝐿𝜇subscript𝐿𝜏U(1)_{L_{\mu}-L_{\tau}}italic_U ( 1 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,” arXiv:2309.12904 [hep-ph].
  14. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, “Decoding the B→K⁢ν⁢ν→𝐵𝐾𝜈𝜈B\to K\nu\nuitalic_B → italic_K italic_ν italic_ν excess at Belle II: kinematics, operators, and masses,” arXiv:2312.12507 [hep-ph].
  15. F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen, and F. Xu, “Correlating B→K(*)⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K^{(*)}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG and flavor anomalies in SMEFT,” arXiv:2401.11552 [hep-ph].
  16. F. Loparco, “A new look at b→s→𝑏𝑠b\to sitalic_b → italic_s observables in 331 models,” arXiv:2401.11999 [hep-ph].
  17. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, “Deciphering the Belle II data on B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation,” arXiv:2402.19208 [hep-ph].
  18. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, “Rare B𝐵Bitalic_B and K𝐾Kitalic_K decays in a scotogenic model,” arXiv:2403.02897 [hep-ph].
  19. A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, “B→K*⁢MX→𝐵superscript𝐾subscript𝑀𝑋B\to K^{*}M_{X}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs B→K⁢MX→𝐵𝐾subscript𝑀𝑋B\to KM_{X}italic_B → italic_K italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario,” EPL 145 no. 1, (2024) 14001, arXiv:2309.17191 [hep-ph].
  20. M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, “Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG data,” arXiv:2309.03706 [hep-ph].
  21. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, “B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 3, (2024) L031701, arXiv:2310.15136 [hep-ph].
  22. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, “Light New Physics in B→K(*)⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K^{(*)}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG?,” arXiv:2311.14629 [hep-ph].
  23. D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, “Higgs Portal Interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈𝜈B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\nuitalic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν italic_ν Measurement,” arXiv:2312.00982 [hep-ph].
  24. S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, “Recent B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\!\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG Excess and Muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 Illuminating Light Dark Sector with Higgs Portal,” arXiv:2401.10112 [hep-ph].
  25. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, “Explaining the B+→K+⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐵superscript𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG excess via a massless dark photon,” arXiv:2402.05901 [hep-ph].
  26. T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, “When energy goes missing: new physics in b→s⁢ν⁢ν→𝑏𝑠𝜈𝜈b\rightarrow s\nu\nuitalic_b → italic_s italic_ν italic_ν with sterile neutrinos,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 12, (2023) 1135, arXiv:2309.02940 [hep-ph].
  27. H. K. Dreiner, J. Y. Günther, and Z. S. Wang, “The Decay B→K⁢ν⁢ν¯→𝐵𝐾𝜈¯𝜈B\to K\nu\bar{\nu}italic_B → italic_K italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG at Belle II and a Massless Bino in R-parity-violating Supersymmetry,” arXiv:2309.03727 [hep-ph].
  28. T. E. Browder, N. G. Deshpande, R. Mandal, and R. Sinha, “Impact of B→Kν𝜈\nuitalic_νν𝜈\nuitalic_ν¯ measurements on beyond the Standard Model theories,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 5, (2021) 053007, arXiv:2107.01080 [hep-ph].
  29. X. G. He and G. Valencia, “RK(*)ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν and non-standard neutrino interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 821 (2021) 136607, arXiv:2108.05033 [hep-ph].
  30. T. Felkl, S. L. Li, and M. A. Schmidt, “A tale of invisibility: constraints on new physics in b → sν𝜈\nuitalic_νν𝜈\nuitalic_ν,” JHEP 12 (2021) 118, arXiv:2111.04327 [hep-ph].
  31. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, “FCNC B and K meson decays with light bosonic Dark Matter,” JHEP 03 (2023) 037, arXiv:2209.05223 [hep-ph].
  32. M. Ovchynnikov, M. A. Schmidt, and T. Schwetz, “Complementarity of B→K(*)⁢μ⁢μ¯→𝐵superscript𝐾𝜇¯𝜇B\rightarrow K^{(*)}\mu\bar{\mu}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ over¯ start_ARG italic_μ end_ARG and B→K(*)+inv→𝐵superscript𝐾invB\rightarrow K^{(*)}+\textrm{inv}italic_B → italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + inv for searches of GeV-scale Higgs-like scalars,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 9, (2023) 791, arXiv:2306.09508 [hep-ph].
  33. P. Asadi, A. Bhattacharya, K. Fraser, S. Homiller, and A. Parikh, “Wrinkles in the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism and flavorful new physics,” JHEP 10 (2023) 069, arXiv:2308.01340 [hep-ph].
  34. C. Bird, P. Jackson, R. V. Kowalewski, and M. Pospelov, “Search for dark matter in b→s→𝑏𝑠b\to sitalic_b → italic_s transitions with missing energy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201803, arXiv:hep-ph/0401195.
  35. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−--1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,” Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963, arXiv:2301.10731 [hep-ex].
  36. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for invisible Higgs-boson decays in events with vector-boson fusion signatures using 139 fb−11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT of proton-proton data recorded by the ATLAS experiment,” JHEP 08 (2022) 104, arXiv:2202.07953 [hep-ex].
  37. CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., “Search for invisible decays of the Higgs boson produced via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 9, (2022) 092007, arXiv:2201.11585 [hep-ex].
  38. J. Fuentes-Martín, M. König, J. Pagès, A. E. Thomsen, and F. Wilsch, “A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 7, (2023) 662, arXiv:2212.04510 [hep-ph].
  39. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, “Dispersive analysis of B → K(*){}^{(*)}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and Bs𝑠{}_{s}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT→ ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ form factors,” JHEP 12 (2023) 153, arXiv:2305.06301 [hep-ph].
  40. L. Gärtner, N. Hartmann, L. Heinrich, M. Horstmann, T. Kuhr, M. Reboud, S. Stefkova, and D. van Dyk, “Constructing model-agnostic likelihoods, a method for the reinterpretation of particle physics results,” arXiv:2402.08417 [hep-ph].
  41. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,” Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142.
  42. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,” Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465–516.
  43. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145–179.
  44. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506, arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph].
  45. K. K. Boddy and J. Kumar, “Indirect Detection of Dark Matter Using MeV-Range Gamma-Ray Telescopes,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 2, (2015) 023533, arXiv:1504.04024 [astro-ph.CO].
  46. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, “Model-independent analysis of b→d→𝑏𝑑b\rightarrow ditalic_b → italic_d processes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 5, (2023) 419, arXiv:2209.04457 [hep-ph].
  47. G. Alonso-Álvarez and M. Escudero, “The first limit on invisible decays of Bssubscript𝐵𝑠B_{s}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT mesons comes from LEP,” arXiv:2310.13043 [hep-ph].
  48. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., “FLAG Review 2021,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 10, (2022) 869, arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat].
  49. Belle-II Collaboration, W. Altmannshofer et al., “The Belle II Physics Book,” PTEP 2019 no. 12, (2019) 123C01, arXiv:1808.10567 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)].
  50. Belle Collaboration, Y. T. Lai et al., “Search for D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT decays to invisible final states at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 1, (2017) 011102, arXiv:1611.09455 [hep-ex].
  51. BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., “Search for the decay D0→π0⁢ν⁢ν¯→superscript𝐷0superscript𝜋0𝜈¯𝜈D^{0}\to\pi^{0}\nu\bar{\nu}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 7, (2022) L071102, arXiv:2112.14236 [hep-ex].
  52. G. Li and J. Tandean, “FCNC charmed-hadron decays with invisible singlet particles in light of recent data,” JHEP 11 (2023) 205, arXiv:2306.05333 [hep-ph].
  53. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for pair-produced vector-like top and bottom partners in events with large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 8, (2023) 719, arXiv:2212.05263 [hep-ex].
  54. CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., “Search for pair production of vector-like quarks in leptonic final states in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” JHEP 07 (2023) 020, arXiv:2209.07327 [hep-ex].
Citations (8)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.