Fast and accurate nonadiabatic molecular dynamics enabled through variational interpolation of correlated electron wavefunctions
Abstract: We build on the concept of eigenvector continuation to develop an efficient multi-state method for the rigorous and smooth interpolation of a small training set of many-body wavefunctions through chemical space at mean-field cost. The inferred states are represented as variationally optimal linear combinations of the training states transferred between the many-body basis of different nuclear geometries. We show that analytic multi-state forces and nonadiabatic couplings from the model enable application to nonadiabatic molecular dynamics, developing an active learning scheme to ensure a compact and systematically improvable training set. This culminates in application to the nonadiabatic molecular dynamics of a photoexcited 28-atom hydrogen chain, with surprising complexity in the resulting nuclear motion. With just 22 DMRG calculations of training states from the low-energy correlated electronic structure at different geometries, we infer the multi-state energies, forces and nonadiabatic coupling vectors at 12,000 geometries with provable convergence to high accuracy along an ensemble of molecular trajectories, which would not be feasible with a brute force approach. This opens up a route to bridge the timescales between accurate single-point correlated electronic structure methods and timescales of relevance for photo-induced molecular dynamics.
- B. F. E. Curchod and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio nonadiabatic quantum molecular dynamics,” Chemical Reviews 118, 3305–3336 (2018).
- R. Crespo-Otero and M. Barbatti, “Recent advances and perspectives on nonadiabatic mixed quantum–classical dynamics,” Chemical Reviews 118, 7026–7068 (2018), pMID: 29767966, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 .
- T. R. Nelson, A. J. White, J. A. Bjorgaard, A. E. Sifain, Y. Zhang, B. Nebgen, S. Fernandez-Alberti, D. Mozyrsky, A. E. Roitberg, and S. Tretiak, “Non-adiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Theory and applications for modeling photophysics in extended molecular materials,” Chemical Reviews 120, 2215–2287 (2020).
- S. Matsika, “Electronic structure methods for the description of nonadiabatic effects and conical intersections,” Chemical Reviews 121, 9407–9449 (2021).
- S. Matsika and P. Krause, “Nonadiabatic events and conical intersections,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, 621–643 (2011), pMID: 21219147, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103450 .
- M. Born and R. Oppenheimer, “Zur quantentheorie der molekeln,” Annalen der Physik 389, 457–484 (1927).
- J. C. Tully, ‘‘Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 93, 1061–1071 (1990), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/93/2/1061/18987588/1061_1_online.pdf .
- J. E. Subotnik, A. Jain, B. Landry, A. Petit, W. Ouyang, and N. Bellonzi, “Understanding the surface hopping view of electronic transitions and decoherence,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 67, 387–417 (2016), pMID: 27215818, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 .
- A. Jain and J. E. Subotnik, “Surface hopping, transition state theory, and decoherence. II. Thermal rate constants and detailed balance,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 134107 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4930549/15503281/134107_1_online.pdf .
- J. E. Subotnik, W. Ouyang, and B. R. Landry, “Can we derive Tully’s surface-hopping algorithm from the semiclassical quantum Liouville equation? Almost, but only with decoherence,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 139, 214107 (2013), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4829856/16704874/214107_1_online.pdf .
- G. Granucci and M. Persico, “Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 126, 134114 (2007), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2715585/15397070/134114_1_online.pdf .
- G. Granucci, M. Persico, and A. Zoccante, “Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 134111 (2010), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3489004/15430335/134111_1_online.pdf .
- M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio quantum molecular dynamics,” in Advances in Chemical Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002) pp. 439–512, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/0471264318.ch7 .
- F. Plasser, R. Crespo-Otero, M. Pederzoli, J. Pittner, H. Lischka, and M. Barbatti, “Surface hopping dynamics with correlated single-reference methods: 9h-adenine as a case study,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10, 1395–1405 (2014).
- J. Janoš and P. Slavíček, “What controls the quality of photodynamical simulations? electronic structure versus nonadiabatic algorithm,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 8273–8284 (2023).
- M. Barbatti and R. Crespo-Otero, “Surface hopping dynamics with dft excited states,” in Density-Functional Methods for Excited States, edited by N. Ferré, M. Filatov, and M. Huix-Rotllant (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 415–444.
- A. V. Akimov and O. V. Prezhdo, “The pyxaid program for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics in condensed matter systems,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, 4959–4972 (2013).
- B. F. E. Curchod, U. Rothlisberger, and I. Tavernelli, “Trajectory-based nonadiabatic dynamics with time-dependent density functional theory,” ChemPhysChem 14, 1314–1340 (2013), https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cphc.201200941 .
- O. Christiansen, H. Koch, and P. Jørgensen, “The second-order approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles model cc2,” Chemical Physics Letters 243, 409–418 (1995).
- J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, “The equation of motion coupled‐cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 7029–7039 (1993), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/98/9/7029/19054846/7029_1_online.pdf .
- I. Fdez. Galván, M. G. Delcey, T. B. Pedersen, F. Aquilante, and R. Lindh, “Analytical state-average complete-active-space self-consistent field nonadiabatic coupling vectors: Implementation with density-fitted two-electron integrals and application to conical intersections,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, 3636–3653 (2016).
- P. Slavíček and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio floating occupation molecular orbital-complete active space configuration interaction: An efficient approximation to CASSCF,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 234102 (2010), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3436501/16031951/234102_1_online.pdf .
- C. Angeli, “On the nature of the π𝜋\piitalic_π → π*superscript𝜋\pi^{*}italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ionic excited states: The v state of ethene as a prototype,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 30, 1319–1333 (2009), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.21155 .
- Y. J. Bomble, K. W. Sattelmeyer, J. F. Stanton, and J. Gauss, “On the vertical excitation energy of cyclopentadiene,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 121, 5236–5240 (2004), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/121/11/5236/19256483/5236_1_online.pdf .
- J. W. Park and T. Shiozaki, “Analytical derivative coupling for multistate caspt2 theory,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13, 2561–2570 (2017a).
- J. W. Park and T. Shiozaki, “On-the-fly caspt2 surface-hopping dynamics,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13, 3676–3683 (2017b).
- J. J. Szymczak, M. Barbatti, and H. Lischka, “Influence of the active space on casscf nonadiabatic dynamics simulations,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 111, 3307–3315 (2011), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.22978 .
- F. Plasser, M. Barbatti, A. J. A. Aquino, and H. Lischka, “Electronically excited states and photodynamics: a continuing challenge,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 131, 1073 (2012).
- T. Iino, T. Shiozaki, and T. Yanai, ‘‘Algorithm for analytic nuclear energy gradients of state averaged DMRG-CASSCF theory with newly derived coupled-perturbed equations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 054107 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0130636/16702896/054107_1_online.pdf .
- J. W. Park, R. Al-Saadon, M. K. MacLeod, T. Shiozaki, and B. Vlaisavljevich, “Multireference electron correlation methods: Journeys along potential energy surfaces,” Chemical Reviews 120, 5878–5909 (2020).
- A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, “The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 040903 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5129672/13277206/040903_1_online.pdf .
- L. Freitag and M. Reiher, “The density matrix renormalization group for strong correlation in ground and excited states,” in Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2020) Chap. 7, pp. 205–245, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119417774.ch7 .
- G. K.-L. Chan and S. Sharma, “The density matrix renormalization group in quantum chemistry,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, 465–481 (2011), pMID: 21219144, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103338 .
- R. Cimiraglia and M. Persico, “Recent advances in multireference second order perturbation ci: The cipsi method revisited,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 8, 39–47 (1987), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.540080105 .
- A. A. Holmes, N. M. Tubman, and C. J. Umrigar, “Heat-bath configuration interaction: An efficient selected configuration interaction algorithm inspired by heat-bath sampling,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, 3674–3680 (2016).
- K. Guther, R. J. Anderson, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, D. Cleland, N. Dattani, W. Dobrautz, K. Ghanem, P. Jeszenszki, N. Liebermann, G. L. Manni, A. Y. Lozovoi, H. Luo, D. Ma, F. Merz, C. Overy, M. Rampp, P. K. Samanta, L. R. Schwarz, J. J. Shepherd, S. D. Smart, E. Vitale, O. Weser, G. H. Booth, and A. Alavi, “NECI: N-Electron Configuration Interaction with an emphasis on state-of-the-art stochastic methods,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 034107 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0005754/16756540/034107_1_online.pdf .
- R. J. A. James J. Halson and G. H. Booth, “Improved stochastic multireference perturbation theory for correlated systems with large active spaces,” Molecular Physics 118, e1802072 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2020.1802072 .
- M. Motta and S. Zhang, “Ab initio computations of molecular systems by the auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo method,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 8, e1364 (2018), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1364 .
- J. Lee, H. Q. Pham, and D. R. Reichman, “Twenty years of auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo in quantum chemistry: An overview and assessment on main group chemistry and bond-breaking,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 7024–7042 (2022).
- K. Choo, A. Mezzacapo, and G. Carleo, “Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure,” Nature Communications 11, 2368 (2020).
- Y. Rath and G. H. Booth, “Framework for efficient ab initio electronic structure with gaussian process states,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 205119 (2023).
- L. Otis and E. Neuscamman, “A promising intersection of excited-state-specific methods from quantum chemistry and quantum monte carlo,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 13, e1659 (2023), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1659 .
- A. Baiardi, A. K. Kelemen, and M. Reiher, “Excited-state dmrg made simple with feast,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 415–430 (2022).
- N. S. Blunt, S. D. Smart, G. H. Booth, and A. Alavi, “An excited-state approach within full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 134117 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4932595/15503341/134117_1_online.pdf .
- H. Lischka, D. Nachtigallová, A. J. A. Aquino, P. G. Szalay, F. Plasser, F. B. C. Machado, and M. Barbatti, “Multireference approaches for excited states of molecules,” Chemical Reviews 118, 7293–7361 (2018).
- W. Hu and G. K.-L. Chan, “Excited-state geometry optimization with the density matrix renormalization group, as applied to polyenes,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11, 3000–3009 (2015).
- R. E. Thomas, D. Opalka, C. Overy, P. J. Knowles, A. Alavi, and G. H. Booth, “Analytic nuclear forces and molecular properties from full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 054108 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4927594/15497969/054108_1_online.pdf .
- T. Jiang, W. Fang, A. Alavi, and J. Chen, “General analytical nuclear force and molecular potential energy surface from full configuration interaction quantum monte carlo,” (2022).
- S. Chen and S. Zhang, “Computation of forces and stresses in solids: Towards accurate structural optimization with auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 195150 (2023).
- Y. Luo and S. Sorella, “Ab initio molecular dynamics with quantum monte carlo,” Frontiers in Materials 2 (2015), 10.3389/fmats.2015.00029.
- J. Westermayr, M. Gastegger, M. F. S. J. Menger, S. Mai, L. González, and P. Marquetand, “Machine learning enables long time scale molecular photodynamics simulations,” Chem. Sci. 10, 8100–8107 (2019).
- J. Li, P. Reiser, B. R. Boswell, A. Eberhard, N. Z. Burns, P. Friederich, and S. A. Lopez, “Automatic discovery of photoisomerization mechanisms with nanosecond machine learning photodynamics simulations,” Chem. Sci. 12, 5302–5314 (2021).
- B.-X. Xue, M. Barbatti, and P. O. Dral, “Machine learning for absorption cross sections,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 124, 7199–7210 (2020).
- P. O. Dral and M. Barbatti, “Molecular excited states through a machine learning lens,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 5, 388–405 (2021).
- J. Westermayr, M. Gastegger, and P. Marquetand, “Combining schnet and sharc: The schnarc machine learning approach for excited-state dynamics,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 3828–3834 (2020).
- S. Axelrod, E. Shakhnovich, and R. Gómez-Bombarelli, “Excited state non-adiabatic dynamics of large photoswitchable molecules using a chemically transferable machine learning potential,” Nature Communications 13, 3440 (2022).
- J. Li and S. A. Lopez, “A look inside the black box of machine learning photodynamics simulations,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55, 1972–1984 (2022).
- M. T. do Casal, J. M. Toldo, M. Pinheiro Jr, and M. Barbatti, “Fewest switches surface hopping with baeck-an couplings,” Open Research Europe 1, 49 (2022).
- I. C. D. Merritt, D. Jacquemin, and M. Vacher, “Nonadiabatic coupling in trajectory surface hopping: How approximations impact excited-state reaction dynamics,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 1827–1842 (2023).
- J. Westermayr and P. Marquetand, “Machine learning and excited-state molecular dynamics,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology 1, 043001 (2020).
- Y. Rath and G. H. Booth, “Interpolating many-body wave functions for accelerated molecular dynamics on near-exact electronic surfaces,” (2024).
- R. Olivares-Amaya, W. Hu, N. Nakatani, S. Sharma, J. Yang, and G. K.-L. Chan, “The ab-initio density matrix renormalization group in practice,” J. Chem. Phys. 142, 034102 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4905329/14692204/034102_1_online.pdf .
- H. Zhai and G. K.-L. Chan, “Low communication high performance ab initio density matrix renormalization group algorithms,” J. Chem. Phys. 154, 224116 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0050902/14003774/224116_1_online.pdf .
- D. Frame, R. He, I. Ipsen, D. Lee, D. Lee, and E. Rrapaj, “Eigenvector continuation with subspace learning,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 032501 (2018), 1711.07090 .
- P. Demol, T. Duguet, A. Ekström, M. Frosini, K. Hebeler, S. König, D. Lee, A. Schwenk, V. Somà, and A. Tichai, “Improved many-body expansions from eigenvector continuation,” Phys. Rev. C 101, 041302 (2020), 1911.12578 .
- T. Duguet, A. Ekström, R. J. Furnstahl, S. König, and D. Lee, “Eigenvector continuation and projection-based emulators,” (2023), arXiv:2310.19419 [nucl-th] .
- S. König, A. Ekström, K. Hebeler, D. Lee, and A. Schwenk, “Eigenvector continuation as an efficient and accurate emulator for uncertainty quantification,” Phys. Lett. B 810, 135814 (2020), 1909.08446 .
- N. Yapa, K. Fossez, and S. König, “Eigenvector continuation for emulating and extrapolating two-body resonances,” Phys. Rev. C 107, 064316 (2023), 2303.06139 .
- C. Drischler, M. Quinonez, P. Giuliani, A. Lovell, and F. Nunes, “Toward emulating nuclear reactions using eigenvector continuation,” Phys. Lett. B 823, 136777 (2021), 2108.08269 .
- S. E. Schrader and S. Kvaal, “Accelerated coupled cluster calculations with Procrustes orbital interpolation,” J. Chem. Phys. 158, 114116 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0141145/16792499/114116_1_online.pdf .
- C. Mejuto-Zaera and A. F. Kemper, “Quantum eigenvector continuation for chemistry applications,” Electron. Struct. 5, 045007 (2023).
- S.-G. Hwang, “Cauchy’s interlace theorem for eigenvalues of hermitian matrices,” The American Mathematical Monthly 111, 157–159 (2004).
- P. Löwdin, “On the Non‐Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals,” J. Chem. Phys. 18, 365–375 (2004), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/18/3/365/7387148/365_1_online.pdf .
- I. Mayer, ‘‘On löwdin’s method of symmetric orthogonalization*,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90, 63–65 (2002), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.981 .
- S. R. White, “Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863–2866 (1992).
- R. P. Feynman, “Forces in molecules,” Phys. Rev. 56, 340–343 (1939).
- Q. Sun, “Libcint: An efficient general integral library for gaussian basis functions,” J. Comput. Chem. 36, 1664–1671 (2015), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.23981 .
- Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, S. Wouters, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework,” WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1340 (2018), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1340 .
- Q. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Banerjee, P. Bao, M. Barbry, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, G. H. Booth, J. Chen, Z.-H. Cui, J. J. Eriksen, Y. Gao, S. Guo, J. Hermann, M. R. Hermes, K. Koh, P. Koval, S. Lehtola, Z. Li, J. Liu, N. Mardirossian, J. D. McClain, M. Motta, B. Mussard, H. Q. Pham, A. Pulkin, W. Purwanto, P. J. Robinson, E. Ronca, E. R. Sayfutyarova, M. Scheurer, H. F. Schurkus, J. E. T. Smith, C. Sun, S.-N. Sun, S. Upadhyay, L. K. Wagner, X. Wang, A. White, J. D. Whitfield, M. J. Williamson, S. Wouters, J. Yang, J. M. Yu, T. Zhu, T. C. Berkelbach, S. Sharma, A. Y. Sokolov, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Recent developments in the PySCF program package,” J. Chem. Phys. 153, 024109 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0006074/16722275/024109_1_online.pdf .
- B. Bamieh, “A tutorial on matrix perturbation theory (using compact matrix notation),” (2022), arXiv:2002.05001 [math.SP] .
- M. Barbatti, “Velocity adjustment in surface hopping: Ethylene as a case study of the maximum error caused by direction choice,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 17, 3010–3018 (2021).
- M. Barbatti, M. Ruckenbauer, F. Plasser, J. Pittner, G. Granucci, M. Persico, and H. Lischka, “Newton-x: a surface-hopping program for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 4, 26–33 (2014), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1158 .
- I. Fdez. Galván, M. Vacher, A. Alavi, C. Angeli, F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, J. J. Bao, S. I. Bokarev, N. A. Bogdanov, R. K. Carlson, L. F. Chibotaru, J. Creutzberg, N. Dattani, M. G. Delcey, S. S. Dong, A. Dreuw, L. Freitag, L. M. Frutos, L. Gagliardi, F. Gendron, A. Giussani, L. González, G. Grell, M. Guo, C. E. Hoyer, M. Johansson, S. Keller, S. Knecht, G. Kovačević, E. Källman, G. Li Manni, M. Lundberg, Y. Ma, S. Mai, J. P. Malhado, P. Å. Malmqvist, P. Marquetand, S. A. Mewes, J. Norell, M. Olivucci, M. Oppel, Q. M. Phung, K. Pierloot, F. Plasser, M. Reiher, A. M. Sand, I. Schapiro, P. Sharma, C. J. Stein, L. K. Sørensen, D. G. Truhlar, M. Ugandi, L. Ungur, A. Valentini, S. Vancoillie, V. Veryazov, O. Weser, T. A. Wesołowski, P.-O. Widmark, S. Wouters, A. Zech, J. P. Zobel, and R. Lindh, “Openmolcas: From source code to insight,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 5925–5964 (2019).
- J. C. Butcher, “A modified multistep method for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations,” J. ACM 12, 124–135 (1965).
- M. Motta, D. M. Ceperley, G. K.-L. Chan, J. A. Gomez, E. Gull, S. Guo, C. A. Jiménez-Hoyos, T. N. Lan, J. Li, F. Ma, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, U. Ray, G. E. Scuseria, S. Sorella, E. M. Stoudenmire, Q. Sun, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, D. Zgid, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), “Towards the solution of the many-electron problem in real materials: Equation of state of the hydrogen chain with state-of-the-art many-body methods,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 031059 (2017).
- M. Motta, C. Genovese, F. Ma, Z.-H. Cui, R. Sawaya, G. K.-L. Chan, N. Chepiga, P. Helms, C. Jiménez-Hoyos, A. J. Millis, U. Ray, E. Ronca, H. Shi, S. Sorella, E. M. Stoudenmire, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), “Ground-state properties of the hydrogen chain: Dimerization, insulator-to-metal transition, and magnetic phases,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 031058 (2020).
- L. Freitag, Y. Ma, A. Baiardi, S. Knecht, and M. Reiher, “Approximate analytical gradients and nonadiabatic couplings for the state-average density matrix renormalization group self-consistent-field method,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 6724–6737 (2019).
- Y. Yao, K.-W. Sun, Z. Luo, and H. Ma, “Full quantum dynamics simulation of a realistic molecular system using the adaptive time-dependent density matrix renormalization group method,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, 413–419 (2018).
- A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, “Large-scale quantum dynamics with matrix product states,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 3481–3498 (2019).
- J. Ren, W. Li, T. Jiang, Y. Wang, and Z. Shuai, “Time-dependent density matrix renormalization group method for quantum dynamics in complex systems,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 12, e1614 (2022), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1614 .
- H. Zhai, H. R. Larsson, S. Lee, Z.-H. Cui, T. Zhu, C. Sun, L. Peng, R. Peng, K. Liao, J. Tölle, J. Yang, S. Li, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Block2: A comprehensive open source framework to develop and apply state-of-the-art DMRG algorithms in electronic structure and beyond,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 159, 234801 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0180424/18264237/234801_1_5.0180424.pdf .
- J. J. Dorando, J. Hachmann, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Targeted excited state algorithms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 127, 084109 (2007), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2768360/15400866/084109_1_online.pdf .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.