Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fast and accurate nonadiabatic molecular dynamics enabled through variational interpolation of correlated electron wavefunctions

Published 18 Mar 2024 in physics.chem-ph, cond-mat.str-el, physics.comp-ph, and quant-ph | (2403.12275v2)

Abstract: We build on the concept of eigenvector continuation to develop an efficient multi-state method for the rigorous and smooth interpolation of a small training set of many-body wavefunctions through chemical space at mean-field cost. The inferred states are represented as variationally optimal linear combinations of the training states transferred between the many-body basis of different nuclear geometries. We show that analytic multi-state forces and nonadiabatic couplings from the model enable application to nonadiabatic molecular dynamics, developing an active learning scheme to ensure a compact and systematically improvable training set. This culminates in application to the nonadiabatic molecular dynamics of a photoexcited 28-atom hydrogen chain, with surprising complexity in the resulting nuclear motion. With just 22 DMRG calculations of training states from the low-energy correlated electronic structure at different geometries, we infer the multi-state energies, forces and nonadiabatic coupling vectors at 12,000 geometries with provable convergence to high accuracy along an ensemble of molecular trajectories, which would not be feasible with a brute force approach. This opens up a route to bridge the timescales between accurate single-point correlated electronic structure methods and timescales of relevance for photo-induced molecular dynamics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (92)
  1. B. F. E. Curchod and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio nonadiabatic quantum molecular dynamics,” Chemical Reviews 118, 3305–3336 (2018).
  2. R. Crespo-Otero and M. Barbatti, “Recent advances and perspectives on nonadiabatic mixed quantum–classical dynamics,” Chemical Reviews 118, 7026–7068 (2018), pMID: 29767966, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 .
  3. T. R. Nelson, A. J. White, J. A. Bjorgaard, A. E. Sifain, Y. Zhang, B. Nebgen, S. Fernandez-Alberti, D. Mozyrsky, A. E. Roitberg, and S. Tretiak, “Non-adiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: Theory and applications for modeling photophysics in extended molecular materials,” Chemical Reviews 120, 2215–2287 (2020).
  4. S. Matsika, “Electronic structure methods for the description of nonadiabatic effects and conical intersections,” Chemical Reviews 121, 9407–9449 (2021).
  5. S. Matsika and P. Krause, “Nonadiabatic events and conical intersections,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, 621–643 (2011), pMID: 21219147, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103450 .
  6. M. Born and R. Oppenheimer, “Zur quantentheorie der molekeln,” Annalen der Physik 389, 457–484 (1927).
  7. J. C. Tully, ‘‘Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 93, 1061–1071 (1990), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/93/2/1061/18987588/1061_1_online.pdf .
  8. J. E. Subotnik, A. Jain, B. Landry, A. Petit, W. Ouyang, and N. Bellonzi, “Understanding the surface hopping view of electronic transitions and decoherence,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 67, 387–417 (2016), pMID: 27215818, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 .
  9. A. Jain and J. E. Subotnik, “Surface hopping, transition state theory, and decoherence. II. Thermal rate constants and detailed balance,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 134107 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4930549/15503281/134107_1_online.pdf .
  10. J. E. Subotnik, W. Ouyang, and B. R. Landry, “Can we derive Tully’s surface-hopping algorithm from the semiclassical quantum Liouville equation? Almost, but only with decoherence,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 139, 214107 (2013), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4829856/16704874/214107_1_online.pdf .
  11. G. Granucci and M. Persico, “Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 126, 134114 (2007), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2715585/15397070/134114_1_online.pdf .
  12. G. Granucci, M. Persico, and A. Zoccante, “Including quantum decoherence in surface hopping,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 134111 (2010), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3489004/15430335/134111_1_online.pdf .
  13. M. Ben-Nun and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio quantum molecular dynamics,” in Advances in Chemical Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002) pp. 439–512, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/0471264318.ch7 .
  14. F. Plasser, R. Crespo-Otero, M. Pederzoli, J. Pittner, H. Lischka, and M. Barbatti, “Surface hopping dynamics with correlated single-reference methods: 9h-adenine as a case study,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10, 1395–1405 (2014).
  15. J. Janoš and P. Slavíček, “What controls the quality of photodynamical simulations? electronic structure versus nonadiabatic algorithm,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 8273–8284 (2023).
  16. M. Barbatti and R. Crespo-Otero, “Surface hopping dynamics with dft excited states,” in Density-Functional Methods for Excited States, edited by N. Ferré, M. Filatov, and M. Huix-Rotllant (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 415–444.
  17. A. V. Akimov and O. V. Prezhdo, “The pyxaid program for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics in condensed matter systems,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, 4959–4972 (2013).
  18. B. F. E. Curchod, U. Rothlisberger, and I. Tavernelli, “Trajectory-based nonadiabatic dynamics with time-dependent density functional theory,” ChemPhysChem 14, 1314–1340 (2013), https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cphc.201200941 .
  19. O. Christiansen, H. Koch, and P. Jørgensen, “The second-order approximate coupled cluster singles and doubles model cc2,” Chemical Physics Letters 243, 409–418 (1995).
  20. J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, “The equation of motion coupled‐cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 7029–7039 (1993), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/98/9/7029/19054846/7029_1_online.pdf .
  21. I. Fdez. Galván, M. G. Delcey, T. B. Pedersen, F. Aquilante, and R. Lindh, “Analytical state-average complete-active-space self-consistent field nonadiabatic coupling vectors: Implementation with density-fitted two-electron integrals and application to conical intersections,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, 3636–3653 (2016).
  22. P. Slavíček and T. J. Martínez, “Ab initio floating occupation molecular orbital-complete active space configuration interaction: An efficient approximation to CASSCF,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 132, 234102 (2010), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3436501/16031951/234102_1_online.pdf .
  23. C. Angeli, “On the nature of the π𝜋\piitalic_π → π*superscript𝜋\pi^{*}italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ionic excited states: The v state of ethene as a prototype,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 30, 1319–1333 (2009), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.21155 .
  24. Y. J. Bomble, K. W. Sattelmeyer, J. F. Stanton, and J. Gauss, “On the vertical excitation energy of cyclopentadiene,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 121, 5236–5240 (2004), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/121/11/5236/19256483/5236_1_online.pdf .
  25. J. W. Park and T. Shiozaki, “Analytical derivative coupling for multistate caspt2 theory,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13, 2561–2570 (2017a).
  26. J. W. Park and T. Shiozaki, “On-the-fly caspt2 surface-hopping dynamics,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 13, 3676–3683 (2017b).
  27. J. J. Szymczak, M. Barbatti, and H. Lischka, “Influence of the active space on casscf nonadiabatic dynamics simulations,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 111, 3307–3315 (2011), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.22978 .
  28. F. Plasser, M. Barbatti, A. J. A. Aquino, and H. Lischka, “Electronically excited states and photodynamics: a continuing challenge,” Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 131, 1073 (2012).
  29. T. Iino, T. Shiozaki, and T. Yanai, ‘‘Algorithm for analytic nuclear energy gradients of state averaged DMRG-CASSCF theory with newly derived coupled-perturbed equations,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 054107 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0130636/16702896/054107_1_online.pdf .
  30. J. W. Park, R. Al-Saadon, M. K. MacLeod, T. Shiozaki, and B. Vlaisavljevich, “Multireference electron correlation methods: Journeys along potential energy surfaces,” Chemical Reviews 120, 5878–5909 (2020).
  31. A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, “The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 040903 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5129672/13277206/040903_1_online.pdf .
  32. L. Freitag and M. Reiher, “The density matrix renormalization group for strong correlation in ground and excited states,” in Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2020) Chap. 7, pp. 205–245, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119417774.ch7 .
  33. G. K.-L. Chan and S. Sharma, “The density matrix renormalization group in quantum chemistry,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 62, 465–481 (2011), pMID: 21219144, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103338 .
  34. R. Cimiraglia and M. Persico, “Recent advances in multireference second order perturbation ci: The cipsi method revisited,” Journal of Computational Chemistry 8, 39–47 (1987), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.540080105 .
  35. A. A. Holmes, N. M. Tubman, and C. J. Umrigar, “Heat-bath configuration interaction: An efficient selected configuration interaction algorithm inspired by heat-bath sampling,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 12, 3674–3680 (2016).
  36. K. Guther, R. J. Anderson, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, D. Cleland, N. Dattani, W. Dobrautz, K. Ghanem, P. Jeszenszki, N. Liebermann, G. L. Manni, A. Y. Lozovoi, H. Luo, D. Ma, F. Merz, C. Overy, M. Rampp, P. K. Samanta, L. R. Schwarz, J. J. Shepherd, S. D. Smart, E. Vitale, O. Weser, G. H. Booth, and A. Alavi, “NECI: N-Electron Configuration Interaction with an emphasis on state-of-the-art stochastic methods,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 034107 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0005754/16756540/034107_1_online.pdf .
  37. R. J. A. James J. Halson and G. H. Booth, “Improved stochastic multireference perturbation theory for correlated systems with large active spaces,” Molecular Physics 118, e1802072 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2020.1802072 .
  38. M. Motta and S. Zhang, “Ab initio computations of molecular systems by the auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo method,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 8, e1364 (2018), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1364 .
  39. J. Lee, H. Q. Pham, and D. R. Reichman, “Twenty years of auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo in quantum chemistry: An overview and assessment on main group chemistry and bond-breaking,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 7024–7042 (2022).
  40. K. Choo, A. Mezzacapo, and G. Carleo, “Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure,” Nature Communications 11, 2368 (2020).
  41. Y. Rath and G. H. Booth, “Framework for efficient ab initio electronic structure with gaussian process states,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 205119 (2023).
  42. L. Otis and E. Neuscamman, “A promising intersection of excited-state-specific methods from quantum chemistry and quantum monte carlo,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 13, e1659 (2023), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1659 .
  43. A. Baiardi, A. K. Kelemen, and M. Reiher, “Excited-state dmrg made simple with feast,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 415–430 (2022).
  44. N. S. Blunt, S. D. Smart, G. H. Booth, and A. Alavi, “An excited-state approach within full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 134117 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4932595/15503341/134117_1_online.pdf .
  45. H. Lischka, D. Nachtigallová, A. J. A. Aquino, P. G. Szalay, F. Plasser, F. B. C. Machado, and M. Barbatti, “Multireference approaches for excited states of molecules,” Chemical Reviews 118, 7293–7361 (2018).
  46. W. Hu and G. K.-L. Chan, “Excited-state geometry optimization with the density matrix renormalization group, as applied to polyenes,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11, 3000–3009 (2015).
  47. R. E. Thomas, D. Opalka, C. Overy, P. J. Knowles, A. Alavi, and G. H. Booth, “Analytic nuclear forces and molecular properties from full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 054108 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4927594/15497969/054108_1_online.pdf .
  48. T. Jiang, W. Fang, A. Alavi, and J. Chen, “General analytical nuclear force and molecular potential energy surface from full configuration interaction quantum monte carlo,”  (2022).
  49. S. Chen and S. Zhang, “Computation of forces and stresses in solids: Towards accurate structural optimization with auxiliary-field quantum monte carlo,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 195150 (2023).
  50. Y. Luo and S. Sorella, “Ab initio molecular dynamics with quantum monte carlo,” Frontiers in Materials 2 (2015), 10.3389/fmats.2015.00029.
  51. J. Westermayr, M. Gastegger, M. F. S. J. Menger, S. Mai, L. González, and P. Marquetand, “Machine learning enables long time scale molecular photodynamics simulations,” Chem. Sci. 10, 8100–8107 (2019).
  52. J. Li, P. Reiser, B. R. Boswell, A. Eberhard, N. Z. Burns, P. Friederich, and S. A. Lopez, “Automatic discovery of photoisomerization mechanisms with nanosecond machine learning photodynamics simulations,” Chem. Sci. 12, 5302–5314 (2021).
  53. B.-X. Xue, M. Barbatti, and P. O. Dral, “Machine learning for absorption cross sections,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 124, 7199–7210 (2020).
  54. P. O. Dral and M. Barbatti, “Molecular excited states through a machine learning lens,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 5, 388–405 (2021).
  55. J. Westermayr, M. Gastegger, and P. Marquetand, “Combining schnet and sharc: The schnarc machine learning approach for excited-state dynamics,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 3828–3834 (2020).
  56. S. Axelrod, E. Shakhnovich, and R. Gómez-Bombarelli, “Excited state non-adiabatic dynamics of large photoswitchable molecules using a chemically transferable machine learning potential,” Nature Communications 13, 3440 (2022).
  57. J. Li and S. A. Lopez, “A look inside the black box of machine learning photodynamics simulations,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55, 1972–1984 (2022).
  58. M. T. do Casal, J. M. Toldo, M. Pinheiro Jr, and M. Barbatti, “Fewest switches surface hopping with baeck-an couplings,” Open Research Europe 1, 49 (2022).
  59. I. C. D. Merritt, D. Jacquemin, and M. Vacher, “Nonadiabatic coupling in trajectory surface hopping: How approximations impact excited-state reaction dynamics,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 1827–1842 (2023).
  60. J. Westermayr and P. Marquetand, “Machine learning and excited-state molecular dynamics,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology 1, 043001 (2020).
  61. Y. Rath and G. H. Booth, “Interpolating many-body wave functions for accelerated molecular dynamics on near-exact electronic surfaces,”  (2024).
  62. R. Olivares-Amaya, W. Hu, N. Nakatani, S. Sharma, J. Yang, and G. K.-L. Chan, “The ab-initio density matrix renormalization group in practice,” J. Chem. Phys. 142, 034102 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4905329/14692204/034102_1_online.pdf .
  63. H. Zhai and G. K.-L. Chan, “Low communication high performance ab initio density matrix renormalization group algorithms,” J. Chem. Phys. 154, 224116 (2021), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0050902/14003774/224116_1_online.pdf .
  64. D. Frame, R. He, I. Ipsen, D. Lee, D. Lee, and E. Rrapaj, “Eigenvector continuation with subspace learning,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 032501 (2018), 1711.07090 .
  65. P. Demol, T. Duguet, A. Ekström, M. Frosini, K. Hebeler, S. König, D. Lee, A. Schwenk, V. Somà, and A. Tichai, “Improved many-body expansions from eigenvector continuation,” Phys. Rev. C 101, 041302 (2020), 1911.12578 .
  66. T. Duguet, A. Ekström, R. J. Furnstahl, S. König, and D. Lee, “Eigenvector continuation and projection-based emulators,”  (2023), arXiv:2310.19419 [nucl-th] .
  67. S. König, A. Ekström, K. Hebeler, D. Lee, and A. Schwenk, “Eigenvector continuation as an efficient and accurate emulator for uncertainty quantification,” Phys. Lett. B 810, 135814 (2020), 1909.08446 .
  68. N. Yapa, K. Fossez, and S. König, “Eigenvector continuation for emulating and extrapolating two-body resonances,” Phys. Rev. C 107, 064316 (2023), 2303.06139 .
  69. C. Drischler, M. Quinonez, P. Giuliani, A. Lovell, and F. Nunes, “Toward emulating nuclear reactions using eigenvector continuation,” Phys. Lett. B 823, 136777 (2021), 2108.08269 .
  70. S. E. Schrader and S. Kvaal, “Accelerated coupled cluster calculations with Procrustes orbital interpolation,” J. Chem. Phys. 158, 114116 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0141145/16792499/114116_1_online.pdf .
  71. C. Mejuto-Zaera and A. F. Kemper, “Quantum eigenvector continuation for chemistry applications,” Electron. Struct. 5, 045007 (2023).
  72. S.-G. Hwang, “Cauchy’s interlace theorem for eigenvalues of hermitian matrices,” The American Mathematical Monthly 111, 157–159 (2004).
  73. P. Löwdin, “On the Non‐Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals,” J. Chem. Phys. 18, 365–375 (2004), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/18/3/365/7387148/365_1_online.pdf .
  74. I. Mayer, ‘‘On löwdin’s method of symmetric orthogonalization*,” Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90, 63–65 (2002), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qua.981 .
  75. S. R. White, “Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863–2866 (1992).
  76. R. P. Feynman, “Forces in molecules,” Phys. Rev. 56, 340–343 (1939).
  77. Q. Sun, “Libcint: An efficient general integral library for gaussian basis functions,” J. Comput. Chem. 36, 1664–1671 (2015), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jcc.23981 .
  78. Q. Sun, T. C. Berkelbach, N. S. Blunt, G. H. Booth, S. Guo, Z. Li, J. Liu, J. D. McClain, E. R. Sayfutyarova, S. Sharma, S. Wouters, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework,” WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1340 (2018), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1340 .
  79. Q. Sun, X. Zhang, S. Banerjee, P. Bao, M. Barbry, N. S. Blunt, N. A. Bogdanov, G. H. Booth, J. Chen, Z.-H. Cui, J. J. Eriksen, Y. Gao, S. Guo, J. Hermann, M. R. Hermes, K. Koh, P. Koval, S. Lehtola, Z. Li, J. Liu, N. Mardirossian, J. D. McClain, M. Motta, B. Mussard, H. Q. Pham, A. Pulkin, W. Purwanto, P. J. Robinson, E. Ronca, E. R. Sayfutyarova, M. Scheurer, H. F. Schurkus, J. E. T. Smith, C. Sun, S.-N. Sun, S. Upadhyay, L. K. Wagner, X. Wang, A. White, J. D. Whitfield, M. J. Williamson, S. Wouters, J. Yang, J. M. Yu, T. Zhu, T. C. Berkelbach, S. Sharma, A. Y. Sokolov, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Recent developments in the PySCF program package,” J. Chem. Phys. 153, 024109 (2020), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0006074/16722275/024109_1_online.pdf .
  80. B. Bamieh, “A tutorial on matrix perturbation theory (using compact matrix notation),”  (2022), arXiv:2002.05001 [math.SP] .
  81. M. Barbatti, “Velocity adjustment in surface hopping: Ethylene as a case study of the maximum error caused by direction choice,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 17, 3010–3018 (2021).
  82. M. Barbatti, M. Ruckenbauer, F. Plasser, J. Pittner, G. Granucci, M. Persico, and H. Lischka, “Newton-x: a surface-hopping program for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 4, 26–33 (2014), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1158 .
  83. I. Fdez. Galván, M. Vacher, A. Alavi, C. Angeli, F. Aquilante, J. Autschbach, J. J. Bao, S. I. Bokarev, N. A. Bogdanov, R. K. Carlson, L. F. Chibotaru, J. Creutzberg, N. Dattani, M. G. Delcey, S. S. Dong, A. Dreuw, L. Freitag, L. M. Frutos, L. Gagliardi, F. Gendron, A. Giussani, L. González, G. Grell, M. Guo, C. E. Hoyer, M. Johansson, S. Keller, S. Knecht, G. Kovačević, E. Källman, G. Li Manni, M. Lundberg, Y. Ma, S. Mai, J. P. Malhado, P. Å. Malmqvist, P. Marquetand, S. A. Mewes, J. Norell, M. Olivucci, M. Oppel, Q. M. Phung, K. Pierloot, F. Plasser, M. Reiher, A. M. Sand, I. Schapiro, P. Sharma, C. J. Stein, L. K. Sørensen, D. G. Truhlar, M. Ugandi, L. Ungur, A. Valentini, S. Vancoillie, V. Veryazov, O. Weser, T. A. Wesołowski, P.-O. Widmark, S. Wouters, A. Zech, J. P. Zobel, and R. Lindh, “Openmolcas: From source code to insight,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 5925–5964 (2019).
  84. J. C. Butcher, “A modified multistep method for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations,” J. ACM 12, 124–135 (1965).
  85. M. Motta, D. M. Ceperley, G. K.-L. Chan, J. A. Gomez, E. Gull, S. Guo, C. A. Jiménez-Hoyos, T. N. Lan, J. Li, F. Ma, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, U. Ray, G. E. Scuseria, S. Sorella, E. M. Stoudenmire, Q. Sun, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, D. Zgid, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), “Towards the solution of the many-electron problem in real materials: Equation of state of the hydrogen chain with state-of-the-art many-body methods,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 031059 (2017).
  86. M. Motta, C. Genovese, F. Ma, Z.-H. Cui, R. Sawaya, G. K.-L. Chan, N. Chepiga, P. Helms, C. Jiménez-Hoyos, A. J. Millis, U. Ray, E. Ronca, H. Shi, S. Sorella, E. M. Stoudenmire, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem), “Ground-state properties of the hydrogen chain: Dimerization, insulator-to-metal transition, and magnetic phases,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 031058 (2020).
  87. L. Freitag, Y. Ma, A. Baiardi, S. Knecht, and M. Reiher, “Approximate analytical gradients and nonadiabatic couplings for the state-average density matrix renormalization group self-consistent-field method,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 6724–6737 (2019).
  88. Y. Yao, K.-W. Sun, Z. Luo, and H. Ma, “Full quantum dynamics simulation of a realistic molecular system using the adaptive time-dependent density matrix renormalization group method,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, 413–419 (2018).
  89. A. Baiardi and M. Reiher, “Large-scale quantum dynamics with matrix product states,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 15, 3481–3498 (2019).
  90. J. Ren, W. Li, T. Jiang, Y. Wang, and Z. Shuai, “Time-dependent density matrix renormalization group method for quantum dynamics in complex systems,” WIREs Computational Molecular Science 12, e1614 (2022), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1614 .
  91. H. Zhai, H. R. Larsson, S. Lee, Z.-H. Cui, T. Zhu, C. Sun, L. Peng, R. Peng, K. Liao, J. Tölle, J. Yang, S. Li, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Block2: A comprehensive open source framework to develop and apply state-of-the-art DMRG algorithms in electronic structure and beyond,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 159, 234801 (2023), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0180424/18264237/234801_1_5.0180424.pdf .
  92. J. J. Dorando, J. Hachmann, and G. K.-L. Chan, “Targeted excited state algorithms,” The Journal of Chemical Physics 127, 084109 (2007), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2768360/15400866/084109_1_online.pdf .
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 15 likes about this paper.