Postselection technique for optical Quantum Key Distribution with improved de Finetti reductions
Abstract: The postselection technique is an important proof technique for proving the security of quantum key distribution protocols against coherent attacks. In this work, we go through multiple steps to rigorously apply the postselection technique to optical quantum key distribution protocols. First, we place the postselection technique on a rigorous mathematical foundation by fixing a technical flaw in the original postselection paper. Second, we extend the applicability of the postselection technique to prepare-and-measure protocols by using a de Finetti reduction with a fixed marginal. Third, we show how the postselection technique can be used for decoy-state protocols by tagging the source. Finally, we extend the applicability of the postselection technique to realistic optical setups by developing a new variant of the flag-state squasher. We also improve existing de Finetti reductions, which reduce the effect of using the postselection technique on the key rate. These improvements can be more generally applied to other quantum information processing tasks. As an example to demonstrate the applicability of our work, we apply our results to the time-bin encoded three-state protocol. We observe that the postselection technique performs better than all other known proof techniques against coherent attacks.
- M. Koashi, New Journal of Physics 11, 045018 (2009).
- T. Metger, O. Fawzi, D. Sutter, and R. Renner, “Generalised entropy accumulation,” (2022), arXiv:2203.04989 [quant-ph].
- M. Tomamichel and A. Leverrier, Quantum 1, 1 (2017), arXiv: 1506.08458.
- M. Sandfuchs, M. Haberland, V. Vilasini, and R. Wolf, “Security of differential phase shift QKD from relativistic principles,” (2023), arXiv:2301.11340 [quant-ph].
- G. Currás-Lorenzo, M. Pereira, G. Kato, M. Curty, and K. Tamaki, “A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations,” (2023), arXiv:2305.05930 [quant-ph].
- O. Fawzi and R. Renner, Communications in Mathematical Physics 340, 575 (2015).
- R. Renner, “Security of Quantum Key Distribution,” (2005), arXiv: quant-ph/0512258.
- R. Arnon-Friedman and R. Renner, Journal of Mathematical Physics 56, 052203 (2015), arXiv:1308.0312 [quant-ph].
- P. Belzig, “Studying Stabilizer de Finetti Theorems and Possible Applications in Quantum Information Processing,” (2020).
- T. Matsuura, S. Yamano, Y. Kuramochi, T. Sasaki, and M. Koashi, “Tight concentration inequalities for quantum adversarial setups,” (2024).
- C. Portmann and R. Renner, “Cryptographic security of quantum key distribution,” (2014), arXiv:1409.3525 [quant-ph].
- KAsubscript𝐾𝐴K_{A}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT technically also contains the special ⊥bottom\bot⊥ symbol if the protocol aborts.
- M. Hayashi and R. Nakayama, New Journal of Physics 16, 063009 (2014), arXiv:1302.4139 [quant-ph].
- D. Tupkary, E. Y.-Z. Tan, and N. Lutkenhaus, “Security Proof for Variable-Length Quantum Key Distribution,” (2023), arXiv:2311.01600 [quant-ph].
- W.-Y. Hwang, Physical Review Letters 91, 057901 (2003), publisher: American Physical Society.
- X.-B. Wang, Physical Review Letters 94, 230503 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410075.
- A. Ferenczi and N. Lütkenhaus, Physical Review A , 1 (2011), arXiv: 1112.3396.
- Since the dimension reduction method is the only reduction to finite dimensions for CVQKD that is currently known, the use of the postselection technique in CVQKD is an open problem.
- N. K. H. Li, “Application of the Flag-State Squashing Model to Numerical Quantum Key Distribution Security Analysis,” (2020).
- N. K. H. Li and N. Lütkenhaus, Physical Review Research 2, 043172 (2020).
- Note that these works find key rates in the asymptotic regime and thus the technical flaw from Ref. [6] does not pose a problem.
- J. M. Landsberg, Tensors: geometry and applications: geometry and applications, Vol. 128 (American Mathematical Soc., 2011).
- A. W. Harrow, “Applications of coherent classical communication and the Schur transform to quantum information theory,” (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0512255.
- N. J. Beaudry, “Assumptions in Quantum Cryptography,” (2015), arXiv:1505.02792 [quant-ph] version: 1.
- M. Tomamichel, 2021 (2015), 10.1007/978-3-319-21891-5, arXiv: 1504.00233.
- Vesely, Libor, “Integral jensen inequality,” www.mat.unimi.it/users/libor/AnConvessa/Jensen.pdf.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.