Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Deep Holes of Twisted Reed-Solomon Codes

Published 18 Mar 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2403.11436v2)

Abstract: The deep holes of a linear code are the vectors that achieve the maximum error distance (covering radius) to the code. {Determining the covering radius and deep holes of linear codes is a fundamental problem in coding theory. In this paper, we investigate the problem of deep holes of twisted Reed-Solomon codes.} The covering radius and a standard class of deep holes of twisted Reed-Solomon codes ${\rm TRS}_k(\mathcal{A}, \theta)$ are obtained for a general evaluation set $\mathcal{A} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q$. Furthermore, we consider the problem of determining all deep holes of the full-length twisted Reed-Solomon codes ${\rm TRS}_k(\mathbb{F}_q, \theta)$. For even $q$, by utilizing the polynomial method and Gauss sums over finite fields, we prove that the standard deep holes are all the deep holes of ${\rm TRS}_k(\mathbb{F}_q, \theta)$ with $\frac{3q-4}{4} \leq k\leq q-4$. For odd $q$, we adopt a different method and employ the results on some equations over finite fields to show that there are also no other deep holes of ${\rm TRS}_k(\mathbb{F}_q, \theta)$ with $\frac{3q+3\sqrt{q}-7}{4} \leq k\leq q-4$. In addition, for the boundary cases of $k=q-3, q-2$ and $q-1$, we completely determine their deep holes using results on certain character sums.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. A. McLoughlin, “The complexity of computing the covering radius of a code,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. IT-30, no. 6, pp. 800–804, Nov. 1984.
  2. A. Dur, “On the covering radius of Reed-Solomon codes,” Discrete Math., vol. 126, pp. 99–105, 1994.
  3. O.S. Rothaus, “On ‘bent’ functions,” J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, vol. 20, pp. 300–305, 1976.
  4. Q. Cheng and E. Murray, “On deciding deep holes of Reed–Solomon codes,” in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 4484. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 296–305, 2007.
  5. J. Li and D. Wan, “On the subset sum problem over finite fields,” Finite Fields Appl., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 911–929, 2008.
  6. Y. Li and D. Wan, “On error distance of Reed–Solomon codes,”Sci. China A, Math., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1982–1988, 2008.
  7. J. Li and D. Wan, “A new sieve for distinct coordinate counting,”Sci. China Math., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2351–2362, 2010.
  8. R. Wu and S. Hong, “On deep holes of standard Reed–Solomon codes,” Sci. China Math., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2447–2455, 2012.
  9. G. Zhu and D. Wan, “Computing error distance of Reed–Solomon codes,” in Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 7287. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 214–224.
  10. A. Cafure, G. Matera, and M. Privitelli, “Singularities of symmetric hypersurfaces and an application to Reed–Solomon codes,” Adv. Math. Commun., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69–94, 2012.
  11. J. Zhang, F.-W. Fu, and Q.-Y. Liao, “New deep holes of generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” Sci. Sin. Math., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 727–740, 2013.
  12. M. Keti and D. Wan, “Deep holes in Reed–Solomon codes based on Dickson polynomials,” Finite Fields Their Appl., vol. 40, pp. 110–125, Jul. 2016.
  13. J. Zhuang, Q. Cheng, and J. Li, “On determining deep holes of generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 199–207, Jan. 2016.
  14. K. Kaipa, “Deep holes and MDS extensions of Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 4940–4948, Aug. 2017.
  15. J. Zhang, D. Wan, and K. Kaipa, “Deep holes of projective Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 2392–2401, Apr. 2020.
  16. V. Guruswami and A. Vardy, “Maximum-likelihood decoding of Reed–Solomon codes is NP-hard,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2249–2256, Jul. 2005.
  17. G. Seroussi and R. M. Roth, “On MDS extensions of generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 349–354, May 1986.
  18. P. Beelen, S. Puchinger, and J. R. N. Nielsen, “Twisted Reed–Solomon codes,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), Jun. 2017, pp. 1–15.
  19. P. Beelen, S. Puchinger, and J. Rosenkilde, “Twisted Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3047–3061, May 2022.
  20. D. Huang, Q. Yue, Y. Niu, and X. Li, “MDS or NMDS self-dual codes from twisted generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” Des., Codes Cryptogr., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 2195–2209, Sep. 2021.
  21. H. Liu and S. Liu, “Construction of MDS twisted Reed–Solomon codes and LCD MDS codes,” Des., Codes Cryptogr., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 2051–2065, Sep. 2021.
  22. J. Sui, Q. Yue, X. Li, and D. Huang, “MDS, Near-MDS or 2-MDS Self-Dual Codes via Twisted Generalized Reed-Solomon Codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 7832-7841, Dec. 2022.
  23. J. Zhang, Z. Zhou, and C. Tang, “A class of twisted generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” Des., Codes Cryptogr., vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1649–1658, Jul. 2022.
  24. J. Sui, Q. Yue, X. Li, and D. Huang, “MDS, near-MDS or 2-MDS self-dual codes via twisted generalized Reed–Solomon codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 7832–7841, Dec. 2022.
  25. P. Beelen, M. Bossert, S. Puchinger, and J. Rosenkilde, “Structural properties of twisted Reed–Solomon codes with applications to cryptography,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), Jun. 2018, pp. 946–950.
  26. J. Lavauzelle and J. Renner, “Cryptanalysis of a system based on twisted Reed–Solomon codes,” Des., Codes Cryptogr., vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1285–1300, Jul. 2020.
  27. D. Hiren, “The MDS Conjecture and related questions in finite geometry,” Master Thesis, 2019.
  28. J. T. Schwartz, “Fast probabilistic algorithms for verification of polynomial identities,” J. ACM, vol. 27, no. 4, pp.701–717, 1980.
  29. R. Zippel, “Probabilistic algorithms for sparse polynomials,” In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Springer-Verlag, pp. 216–226, 1979
  30. D. Schipani and M. Elia, “Gauss sums of the cubic character over G⁢F⁢(2m)𝐺𝐹superscript2𝑚GF(2^{m})italic_G italic_F ( 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ): an elementary derivation,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. vol. 59, pp. 11–18, 2011.
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.