Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Panic Escape

Published 18 Mar 2024 in physics.soc-ph and hep-th | (2403.11394v3)

Abstract: Panic-induced herding in individuals often leads to social disasters, resulting in people being trapped and trampled in crowd stampedes triggered by panic. We introduce a novel approach that offers fresh insights into studying the phenomenon of asymmetrical panic-induced escape. Our approach is based on the concept of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking (SSB), a fundamental governing mechanism in the Physical Sciences. By applying the principles of SSB, we conjecture that the onset of disastrous effects of panic can be understood as a SSB phenomenon, and we formulate the process accordingly. We highlight that this way of understanding panic escape leads to simple general measures of preventing catastrophic situations, by considering two crucial parameters: \emph{population density} and \emph{external information}. The interplay of these two parameters is responsible for either breaking or restoring the symmetry of a system. We describe how these parameters are set by design conditions as well as crowd control. Based on these parameters, we discuss strategies for preventing potential social disasters caused by asymmetrical panic escape.

Authors (3)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic
  2. D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic,” Nature 407, 487-490 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35035023
  3. N. R. Johnson, “Panic at “The Who Concert Stampede”: an empirical assessment,” Soc. Problems 34(4), 362-373 (1987).
  4. D. Elliott and D. Smith, “Football stadia disasters in the United Kingdom: learning from tragedy?,” Ind. Environ. Crisis Q. 7(3), 205-229 (1993).
  5. J. Lee, “South Korea’s deadly Halloween crush was avoidable, experts say,” REUTERS, November 1, (2022).
  6. C. Burstedde, K. Klauck, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz, “Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton,” Physica A 295, 507-525 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00141-8
  7. Y. Tajima and T. Nagatani, “Scaling behavior of crowd flow outside a hall,” Physica A 292, 545-554 (2001).
  8. A. Kirchner and A. Schadschneider, “Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physica A 312, 260-276 (2002). doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(02)00857-9 [arXiv:cond-mat/0203461].
  9. G. J. Perez, G. Tapang, M. Lim, and C. Saloma, “Streaming, disruptive interference and power-law behavior in the exit dynamics of confined pedestrians,” Physica A 312, 609-618 (2002).
  10. C. Saloma, G. J. Perez, G. Tapang, M. Lim, and C. P. Saloma, “Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100, 11947-11952 (2003).
  11. D. Helbing, M. Isobe, T. Nagatani, and K. Takimoto, “Lattice gas simulation of experimentally studied evacuation dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E 67, 067101 (2003).
  12. E. Altshuler, O. Ramos, Y. Núñez, J. Fernández, A. J. Batista-Leyva, and C. Noda, “Symmetry breaking in escaping ants,” Am. Nat. 166, 643-649 (2005). doi: 10.1086/498139
  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_symmetry_breaking
  14. A. J. Beekman, L. Rademaker, and J. van Wezel, “An introduction to spontaneous symmetry breaking,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 11 (2019). doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.11
  15. M. Fu, R. Liu, and Y. Zhang, “Do people follow neighbors? An immersive virtual reality experimental study of social influence on individual risky decisions during evacuations,” Automation in Construction 126, 103644 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103644
  16. J. Lin, R. Zhu, N. Li, and B. Becerik-Gerber, “How occupants respond to building emergencies: A systematic review of behavioral characteristics and behavioral theories,” Safety Science 122, 104540 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104540
  17. A. Tsurushima, “Herd Behavior Is Sufficient to Reproduce Human Evacuation Decisions During the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp.3−--25 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71158-0_1
  18. Q. Wang, W. Song, H. Xiao, J. Zhang, L. Xia, J. Ma, and S. Cao, “Insight into evacuation from single-exit room in stress: Mice experiment,” International Journal of Modern Physics C 32, no.0202, 2150024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183121500248
  19. S. Wang, W. Lv, and W. Song, “Behavior of Ants Escaping from a Single-Exit Room,” PLoS ONE 10(6): e0131784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131784
  20. N. Shaikh, K. E. Kakosimos, N. Adia, and L. Véchot, “Concept and demonstration of a fully coupled and dynamic exposure-response methodology for crowd evacuation numerical modelling in airborne-toxic environments,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 399, 123093 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123093
  21. S. Kenjeres, and S. Zwinkels, “Numerical Modeling of the Macroscopic Behavior of a Crowd of People under Emergency Conditions Triggered by an Incidental Release of a Heavy Gas: an Integrated Approach,” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 103, no.44, 1081 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00053-9
  22. S. Boari, R. Josens, and D. R. Parisi, “Efficient Egress of Escaping Ants Stressed with Temperature,” PLoS ONE 8(11): e81082 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081082
  23. Y.-K. Chung and C.-C.i Lin, “Heat-induced symmetry breaking in ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) escape behavior,” PLOS ONE 12, no.33, e0173642 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173642
  24. M. Y. B. Zion, Y. Caba, A. Modin, and P. M. Chaikin, “Cooperation in a fluid swarm of fuel-free micro-swimmers,” Nature Communications 13, no.11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27870-9
  25. H. Xiong, X. Chen, Y. Wen, M. Layne, Z. Sun, T. Ma, X. Wen, and C. Wang, “Escaping and repairing behaviors of the termite Odontotermes formosanus (Blattodea: Termitidae) in response to disturbance,” PeerJ 6, e4513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4513
  26. Y. Liu and Z. Mao, “An experimental study on the critical state of herd behavior in decision-making of the crowd evacuation,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 595, 127087 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127087
  27. X. Li, T. Xue, Y. Sun, J. Fan, H. Li, M. Liu, Z. Han, Z. Di, and X. Chen, “Discontinuous and continuous transitions of collective behaviors in living systems,” Chinese Physics B 30, no.1212, 128703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ac3c3f
  28. M. Haghani, “Empirical methods in pedestrian, crowd and evacuation dynamics: Part II. Field methods and controversial topics,” Safety Science 129, 104760 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104760
  29. T. Zhang, S.-S. Huang, X.-L. Zhang, S.-X. Lu, and C.-H. Li, “Effect of exit location on flow of mice under emergency condition,” Chinese Physics B 28, no.11, 010505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/28/1/010505
  30. T. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. Huang, C. Li, and S. Lu, “Collective behavior of mice passing through an exit under panic,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 496, 233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.055
  31. Z. Shahhoseini and M. Sarvi, “Collective movements of pedestrians: How we can learn from simple experiments with non-human (ant) crowds,” PLOS ONE 12, no.88, e0182913 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182913
  32. J. Gao, C. Gu, H. Yang, and C. Shen, “Effects of the hierarchical lockdown control measure on the dynamic mechanism of individuals’ locomotor activities,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 175, 113980 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113980
  33. M. Shi, E. W. M. Lee, Y. Ma, W. Xie, and R. Cao, “The density-speed correlated mesoscopic model for the study of pedestrian flow,” Safety Science 133, 105019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105019
  34. J. Lin, N. Li, L.-L. Rao, and R. Lovreglio, “Individual wayfinding decisions under stress in indoor emergency situations: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis,” Safety Science 160, 106063 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106063
  35. A. Tsurushima, “Tunnel Vision Hypothesis: Cognitive Factor Affecting Crowd Evacuation Decisions,” SN Computer Science 3, no.55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01217-7
  36. A. Abouee-Mehrizi, S. S. Alizadeh, M. Masoomi, and R. Barazandeh‐Asl, “Likely behaviours of people under emergency circumstances in hospitals: A cross‐sectional study,” The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 37, no.22, 979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3386
  37. K. Zia, U. Farooq, M. Shafi, and A. Ferscha, “On the effectiveness of multi-feature evacuation systems: an agent-based exploratory simulation study,” PeerJ Computer Science 7, e531 (2021). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.531
  38. A. Chen, J. He, M. Liang, and G. Su, “Crowd response considering herd effect and exit familiarity under emergent occasions: A case study of an evacuation drill experiment,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 556, 124654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124654
  39. M. Haghani and M. Sarvi, “Imitative (herd) behaviour in direction decision-making hinders efficiency of crowd evacuation processes,” Safety Science 114, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.026
  40. T. Liu, Z. Liu, Y. Chai, and J. Wang, “Modeling Emotional Contagion for Crowd in Emergencies,” E-Learning and Games, pp.161-168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23712-7_23
  41. Q. Ji, C. Xin, S. X. Tang, and J. P. Huang, “Symmetry associated with symmetry break: Revisiting ants and humans escaping from multiple-exit rooms,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 492, 941 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.024
  42. M. Haghani and M. Sarvi, “Following the crowd or avoiding it? Empirical investigation of imitative behaviour in emergency escape of human crowds,” Animal Behaviour 124, 47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.024
  43. W. Feng, W. Li, T. Zhang, and X. Yao, “Emergency evacuation simulation and test research of civil aircraft complex groups based on the social attribute,” Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University 40, no.44, 853 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20224040853
  44. M. Haghani, M. Sarvi, Z. Shahhoseini, and M. Boltes, “Dynamics of social groups’ decision-making in evacuations,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 104, 135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.029
  45. A. Tsurushima, “Symmetry Breaking in Evacuation Exit Choice: Impacts of Cognitive Bias and Physical Factor on Evacuation Decision,” ICAART 2019: Agents and Artificial Intelligence, pp.293-316 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_15
  46. H. Gayathri, P. M. Aparna, and A. Verma, “A review of studies on understanding crowd dynamics in the context of crowd safety in mass religious gatherings,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 25, 82 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.017
  47. G. Li, D. Huan, B. Roehner, Y. Xu, L. Zeng, Z. Di, and Z. Han, “Symmetry Breaking on Density in Escaping Ants: Experiment and Alarm Pheromone Model,” PLoS ONE 9(12): e114517 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114517
  48. Y. Neuman and Y. Cohen, “Unveiling herd behavior in financial markets,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, no.88, 083407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/aceef0
  49. H. Xiao, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, and W. Song, “Experimental study on the single-file movement of mice,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 524, 676 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.032
  50. W. Sulis and Ali Khan, “Contextuality in Collective Intelligence: Not There Yet,” Entropy 25, no.88, 1193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081193
  51. Soshin Chikazumi (Author), C. D. Graham (Editor), “Physics of Ferromagnetism”, Clarendon Press; 2nd Revised ed. edition (April 24, 1997); ISBN-13: 978-0198517764

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

Sign Up for Free