The Role of Extended Horizon Methodology in Renewable-Dense Grids With Inter-Day Long-Duration Energy Storage
Abstract: This study addresses the challenges in optimizing long-duration energy storage (LDES) dispatch within future power systems featuring high integration of variable renewable energy (VRE). The research focuses on conducting a comparative analysis between traditional and extended horizon methods for the optimization of LDES dispatch, using open-source and commercial production cost models (PCMs), tested on a futuristic Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) grid. The findings indicate that, despite its complexity and longer solution times, the extended horizon approach demonstrates superior performance in LDES dispatch and effectively reduces the impact of degenerate solutions in sequential simulations. This study underscores the trade-offs between computational efficiency and improvement in storage dispatch, which is crucial for future energy systems. The analysis highlights the necessity of addressing the degeneracy issue in storage dispatch in grids dominated by zero operating cost VRE generators and low operating cost energy storage devices. Additionally, the research reveals revenue discrepancies for LDES operators across different models, a consequence of the persistent presence of degeneracy in high VRE systems. These findings suggest an urgent need for refined modeling techniques in the planning and operation of future energy systems.
- US DOE. The Pathway to Long Duration Energy Storage: Commercial Liftoff. [Online]. Available: https://liftoff.energy.gov/long-duration-energy-storage/
- O. J. Guerra, S. Dalvi, A. A. Thatte, B. Cowiestoll, J. Jorgenson, , and B. Hodge, “Towards Robust and Scalable Dispatch Modeling of Long-Duration Energy Storage,” arXiv preprint, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16605
- J. P. Deane, E. J. McKeogh, and B. P. O. Gallachoir, “Derivation of intertemporal targets for large pumped hydro energy storage with stochastic optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2147–2155, 2013, doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2236111.
- S. Deml, A. Ulbig, T. Borsche, and G. Andersson, “The role of aggregation in power system simulation,” in 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, 2015, pp. 1–6, doi:10.1109/PTC.2015.7232755.
- T. Niet, “Storage end effects: An evaluation of common storage modelling assumptions,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 27, p. 101050, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101050.
- J. Martinek, J. Jorgenson, M. Mehos, and P. Denholm, “A comparison of price-taker and production cost models for determining system value, revenue, and scheduling of concentrating solar power plants,” Applied Energy, vol. 231, pp. 854–865, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.136.
- N. Gates, W. Cole, A. W. Frazier, and P. Gagnon, “Evaluating the Interactions Between Variable Renewable Energy and Diurnal Storage,” NREL, Tech. Rep., Oct. 2021, doi:10.2172/1827634.
- B. Frew, B. Sergi, P. Denholm, W. Cole, N. Gates, D. Levie, and R. Margolis, “The curtailment paradox in the transition to high solar power systems,” Joule, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1143–1167, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.021.
- F. Geth, C. Coffrin, and D. Fobes, “A flexible storage model for power network optimization,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, 06 2020, doi:10.1145/3396851.3402121.
- J. D. Lara, S. Dalvi, C. Barrows, D. Thom, Lilyhanig, R. Henríquez-Auba, D. Krishnamurthy, P. Monticone, R. Saavedra, M. Irish, dsigler1234, O. Dowson, J. Maack, M. Kratochvil, J. TagBot, M. Cawte, T. Borbáth, T. G. Badger, T. Holy, alefcastelli, C. Coffrin, and timkittel, “NREL-Sienna/PowerSimulations.jl: v0.24.1,” Nov. 2023, doi:10.5281/zenodo.10060186.
- Energy Exemplar, “PLEXOS.”
- W. Cole, A. W. Frazier, and C. Augustine, “Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage: 2021 update,” NREL, Tech. Rep., Jun. 2021, doi:10.2172/1786976.
- O. J. Guerra, J. Eichman, and P. Denholm, “Optimal energy storage portfolio for high and ultrahigh carbon-free and renewable power systems,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 14, pp. 5132–5146, 2021, doi:”10.1039/D1EE01835C”.
- Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual.
- FICO Xpress Optimization Suite.
- J. Ho, J. Becker, M. Brown, P. Brown, I. Chernyakhovskiy, S. Cohen, W. Cole, S. Corcoran, K. Eurek, W. Frazier, P. Gagnon, N. Gates, D. Greer, P. Jadun, S. Khanal, S. Machen, M. Macmillan, T. Mai, M. Mowers, C. Murphy, A. Rose, A. Schleifer, B. Sergi, D. Steinberg, Y. Sun, and E. Zhou, “Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) Model Documentation (Version 2020),” NREL, Tech. Rep., Jun. 2021, doi:10.2172/1788425.
- G. Maclaurin, N. Grue, A. Lopez, D. Heimiller, M. Rossol, G. Buster, and T. Williams, “The Renewable Energy Potential (reV) Model: A Geospatial Platform for Technical Potential and Supply Curve Modeling,” NREL, Tech. Rep., Sep. 2019, doi:10.2172/1563140.
- S. Dalvi. (2024) ERCOT-Energy-Storage-Study-Dataset. GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/NREL/ERCOT-Energy-Storage-Study-Dataset.git
- G. Gamrath, T. Berthold, and D. Salvagnin, “An exploratory computational analysis of dual degeneracy in mixed-integer programming,” EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 241–261, 2020, doi:10.1007/s13675-020-00130-z.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.