A Search for Classical Subsystems in Quantum Worlds
Abstract: Decoherence and einselection have been effective in explaining several features of an emergent classical world from an underlying quantum theory. However, the theory assumes a particular factorization of the global Hilbert space into constituent system and environment subsystems, as well as specially constructed Hamiltonians. In this work, we take a systematic approach to discover, given a fixed Hamiltonian, (potentially) several factorizations (or tensor product structures) of a global Hilbert space that admit a quasi-classical description of subsystems in the sense that certain states (the "pointer states") are robust to entanglement. We show that every Hamiltonian admits a pointer basis in the factorization where the energy eigenvectors are separable. Furthermore, we implement an algorithm that allows us to discover a multitude of factorizations that admit pointer states and use it to explore these quasi-classical "realms" for both random and structured Hamiltonians. We also derive several analytical forms that the Hamiltonian may take in such factorizations, each with its unique set of features. Our approach has several implications: it enables us to derive the division into quasi-classical subsystems, demonstrates that decohering subsystems do not necessarily align with our classical notion of locality, and challenges ideas expressed by some authors that the propensity of a system to exhibit classical dynamics relies on minimizing the interaction between subsystems. From a quantum foundations perspective, these results lead to interesting ramifications for relative-state interpretations. From a quantum engineering perspective, these results may be useful in characterizing decoherence free subspaces and other passive error avoidance protocols.
- P. Zanardi, D. A. Lidar, and S. Lloyd, Quantum tensor product structures are observable induced, Physical review letters 92, 060402 (2004).
- F. Piazza, Glimmers of a pre-geometric perspective, Foundations of Physics 40, 239 (2010).
- M. Tegmark, Consciousness as a state of matter, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 76, 238 (2015).
- J. S. Cotler, G. R. Penington, and D. H. Ranard, Locality from the Spectrum, Commun. Math. Phys. 368, 1267 (2019), arXiv:1702.06142 [quant-ph] .
- S. M. Carroll and A. Singh, Quantum mereology: Factorizing hilbert space into subsystems with quasiclassical dynamics, Physical Review A 103, 022213 (2021).
- P. Zanardi, E. Dallas, and S. Lloyd, Operational quantum mereology and minimal scrambling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14340 (2022).
- D. Deutsch, Quantum theory as a universal physical theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1 (1985).
- J. P. Paz, S. Habib, and W. H. Zurek, Reduction of the wave packet: Preferred observable and decoherence time scale, Physical Review D 47, 488 (1993).
- W. H. Zurek, S. Habib, and J. P. Paz, Coherent states via decoherence, Physical Review Letters 70, 1187 (1993).
- M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports 831, 1 (2019).
- W. H. Zurek, Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?, Physical review D 24, 1516 (1981).
- E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 59, 223 (1985).
- W. H. Zurek, Quantum darwinism, Nature physics 5, 181 (2009).
- H. Ollivier, D. Poulin, and W. H. Zurek, Objective properties from subjective quantum states: Environment as a witness, Physical review letters 93, 220401 (2004).
- H. Ollivier, D. Poulin, and W. H. Zurek, Environment as a witness: Selective proliferation of information and emergence of objectivity in a quantum universe, Physical review A 72, 042113 (2005).
- A. Albrecht, R. Baunach, and A. Arrasmith, Adapted caldeira-leggett model, Physical Review Research 5, 023187 (2023).
- J. R. Anglin, J. P. Paz, and W. H. Zurek, Deconstructing decoherence, Phys. Rev. A 55, 4041 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9611045 .
- D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 13, 377 (1996).
- P. Strasberg, T. E. Reinhard, and J. Schindler, Everything everywhere all at once: A first principles numerical demonstration of emergent decoherent histories, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10258 (2023).
- C. Burgess, R. Holman, and D. Hoover, On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation, arXiv preprint astro-ph/0601646 (2006).
- P. Martineau, On the decoherence of primordial fluctuations during inflation, Classical and quantum gravity 24, 5817 (2007).
- C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, Emergence of classicality for primordial fluctuations: Concepts and analogies, Annalen der Physik 510, 137 (1998).
- J. W. Sharman and G. D. Moore, Decoherence due to the horizon after inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2007 (11), 020.
- M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition, The Frontiers Collection (Springer, 2007).
- A. Knutson and T. Tao, Honeycombs and sums of hermitian matrices (2000), arXiv:math/0009048 [math.RT] .
- S. Coleman, Quantum sine-gordon equation as the massive thirring model, Physical Review D 11, 2088 (1975).
- J. Von Delft and H. Schoeller, Bosonization for beginners—refermionization for experts, Annalen der Physik 510, 225 (1998).
- E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals of Physics 16, 407 (1961).
- T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-dimensional ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions, Reviews of Modern Physics 36, 856 (1964).
- L. Heunisch, C. Eichler, and M. J. Hartmann, Tunable coupler to fully decouple superconducting qubits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17007 (2023).
- D. A. Lidar and K. Birgitta Whaley, Decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems, in Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003) p. 83–120.
- H. Everett III, “relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics, Reviews of modern physics 29, 454 (1957).
- H. Everett, III, The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton U. (1956).
- J. A. Wheeler, Assessment of everett’s” relative state” formulation of quantum theory, Reviews of modern physics 29, 463 (1957).
- B. S. DeWitt, The many-universes interpretation of quantum mechanics, The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , 167 (1973).
- S. Foster and H. Brown, On a recent attempt to define the interpretation basis in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27, 1507 (1988).
- J. Eakins and G. Jaroszkiewicz, Factorization and entanglement in quantum systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36, 517 (2002).
- P. Zanardi, Virtual quantum subsystems, Physical Review Letters 87, 077901 (2001).
- D. Wallace, The emergent multiverse: Quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation (Oxford University Press, USA, 2012).
- B. S. DeWitt, Quantum mechanics and reality, Physics today 23, 30 (1970).
- A. Albrecht, Investigating decoherence in a simple system, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5504 (1992).
- A. Albrecht, Following a ’collapsing’ wave function, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3768 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9309051 .
- F. Dowker and A. Kent, Properties of consistent histories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3038 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9409037 .
- D. Wallace, Worlds in the everett interpretation, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33, 637 (2002).
- U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group, Reviews of modern physics 77, 259 (2005).
- B. F. Green, The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis, Psychometrika 17, 429 (1952).
- N. J. Higham, Matrix nearness problems and applications, Applications of matrix theory 22 (1989).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.