Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Geometric quantum discord of an arbitrary two-qudit state: the exact value and general upper bounds

Published 14 Mar 2024 in quant-ph, math-ph, and math.MP | (2403.09342v4)

Abstract: The geometric quantum discord of a two-qudit state has been studied in many papers, however, its exact analytical value in the explicit form is known only for a general two-qubit state, a general qubit-qudit state and some special families of two-qudit states. Based on the general Bloch vectors formalism [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 195301 (2021)], we find the explicit exact analytical value of the geometric quantum discord for a general two-qudit state of an arbitrary dimension via the parameters of its correlation matrix and the Bloch vectors of its reduced states. This new general analytical result includes all the known exact results on the geometric quantum discord only as particular cases and proves rigorously that the lower bound on the geometric discord presented in [Phys. Rev. A 85, 024102 (2012)] constitutes its exact value for each two-qudit state. Moreover, our new general result allows us to find for an arbitrary two-qudit state, pure or mixed, the novel upper and lower bounds on its geometric quantum discord, expressed via the Hilbert space characteristics of this state.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Bell J S 1964 Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1 195
  2. Aspect A, Dalibard J and Roger G 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 1804
  3. Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2010 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press)
  4. Loubenets E R 2017 Found. Phys. 47 1100–1114
  5. Chen K, Albeverio S and Fei S M 2005 Phys. Rev Lett. 95 040504
  6. Loubenets E R, Kuznetsov S and Hanotel L 2024 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 055302
  7. Ollivier H and Zurek W H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
  8. Girolami D and Adesso G 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 052108
  9. Dakić B, Vedral V and Brukner Č 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 190502
  10. Paula F, De Oliveira T R and Sarandy M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 064101
  11. Spehner D and Orszag, M 2013 New J. Phys. 15 103001
  12. Roga W, Spehner D and Illuminati F 2016 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49 235301
  13. Rana S and Parashar P 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 024102
  14. Luo S and Fu S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 034302
  15. Hassan A S, Lari B and Joag P S 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 024302
  16. Bag P, Dey S and Osaka H 2019 Phys. Lett. A 383 125973
  17. Girolami D and Adesso G 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 052110
  18. Rana S and Parashar P 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 030302
  19. Loubenets E R and Kulakov M S 2021 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 195301
  20. Arvind, Mallesh K S and Mukunda N 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 2417
  21. Jakóbczyk L and Siennicki M 2001 Phys. Lett. A 286 383
  22. Kimura G 2003 Phys. Lett. A 314 339
  23. Byrd M S and Khaneja N 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 062322
  24. Schirmer S G, Zhang T and Leahy J V 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 1389
  25. Kimura G and Kossakowski A 2005 Open Syst. Inf. Dyn 12 207
  26. Mendas I P 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 11313
  27. Bertlmann R A and Krammer P 2008 Journal of Physics A: Math.Theor. 41 235303
  28. Loubenets E R 2020 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 045303
  29. Kim J S, Das A and Sanders B C 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 012329
  30. Mirsky, L. 1975 Monatshefte für Mathematik 79 303

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.