Probing gauge-Higgs Unification models at the ILC with quark-antiquark forward-backward asymmetry at center-of-mass energies above the Z mass
Abstract: The International Linear Collider (ILC) will allow the precise study of $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow q\bar{q}$ interactions at different center-of-mass energies from the $Z$-pole to 1 TeV. In this paper, we discuss the experimental prospects for measuring differential observables in $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow c\bar{c}$ at the ILC baseline energies, 250 and 500 GeV. The study is based on full simulation and reconstruction of the International Large Detector (ILD) concept. Two gauge-Higgs unification models predicting new high-mass resonances beyond the Standard Model are discussed. These models predict sizable deviations of the forward-backward observables at the ILC running above the $Z$ mass and with longitudinally polarized electron and positron beams. The ability of the ILC to probe these models via high-precision measurements of the forward-backward asymmetry is discussed. Alternative scenarios at other energies and beam polarization schemes are also discussed, extrapolating the estimated uncertainties from the two baseline scenarios.
- CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].
- ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].
- ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, S. Schael et al., “Precision electroweak measurements on the z𝑧zitalic_z resonance”, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257–454, arXiv:hep-ex/0509008 [hep-ex].
- A. Djouadi, G. Moreau, and F. Richard, “Resolving the A(FB)**b puzzle in an extra dimensional model with an extended gauge structure”, Nucl. Phys. B773 (2007) 43–64, arXiv:hep-ph/0610173 [hep-ph].
- T. Behnke, J. E. Brau, B. Foster, J. Fuster, M. Harrison, J. M. Paterson, M. Peskin, M. Stanitzki, N. Walker, and H. Yamamoto, “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary. ”, arXiv:1306.6327 [physics.acc-ph].
- H. Baer et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics. ”, arXiv:1306.6352 [hep-ph].
- C. Adolphsen et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3.I: Accelerator &\&& in the Technical Design Phase. ”, arXiv:1306.6353 [physics.acc-ph].
- C. Adolphsenc et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3.II: Accelerator Baseline Design. ”, arXiv:1306.6328 [physics.acc-ph].
- H. Abramowicz et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 4: Detectors”, arXiv:1306.6329 [physics.ins-det].
- ILD Concept Group, H. Abramowicz et al., “International large detector: Interim design report”, arXiv:2003.01116 [physics.ins-det].
- CLIC, CLICdp Collaboration, M. J. Boland et al., “Updated baseline for a staged Compact Linear Collider”, arXiv:1608.07537 [physics.acc-ph].
- CLIC Collaboration, J. de Blas et al., “The CLIC Potential for New Physics”, arXiv:1812.02093 [hep-ph].
- CLICdp, CLIC Collaboration, T. K. Charles et al., “The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report”, arXiv:1812.06018 [physics.acc-ph].
- FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 ”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 6, (2019) 474.
- FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2”, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 2, (2019) 261–623.
- CEPC Study Group, “CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 - Accelerator”, arXiv:1809.00285 [physics.acc-ph].
- CEPC Study Group, M. Dong et al., “CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector”, arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex].
- C. Vernieri et al., “Strategy for Understanding the Higgs Physics: The Cool Copper Collider”, JINST 18 no. 07, (2023) P07053, arXiv:2203.07646 [hep-ex].
- A. Irles, R. Pöschl, and F. Richard, “Experimental methods and prospects on the measurement of electroweak b𝑏bitalic_b and c𝑐citalic_c-quark observables at the ILC operating at 250 GeV”, arXiv:2306.11413 [hep-ex].
- A. Irles and J. P. Marquez, “Experimental prospects for precision observables in e−e+→qq¯→superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝑞¯𝑞e^{-}e^{+}\rightarrow q\bar{q}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_q over¯ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG with q=b,c𝑞𝑏𝑐q=b,citalic_q = italic_b , italic_c processes at the ILC operating at 250 and 500 GeV of center of mass”, in International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders. 7, 2023. arXiv:2307.14888 [hep-ex].
- K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The Minimal composite Higgs model ”, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165–187, arXiv:hep-ph/0412089.
- A. D. Medina, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Gauge-Higgs Unification and Radiative Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Warped Extra Dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095010, arXiv:0706.1281 [hep-ph].
- Y. Hosotani, K. Oda, T. Ohnuma, and Y. Sakamura, “Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in SO(5) x U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification with Top and Bottom Quarks”, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 096002, arXiv:0806.0480 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 079902 (2009)].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and T. Shimotani, “LHC signals of the SO(5)×U(1)𝑆𝑂5𝑈1SO(5)\times U(1)italic_S italic_O ( 5 ) × italic_U ( 1 ) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 9, (2014) 095019, arXiv:1404.2748 [hep-ph].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “GUT inspired SO(5)×U(1)×SU(3)𝑆𝑂5𝑈1𝑆𝑈3SO(5)\times U(1)\times SU(3)italic_S italic_O ( 5 ) × italic_U ( 1 ) × italic_S italic_U ( 3 ) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 9, (2019) 095010, arXiv:1902.01603 [hep-ph].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Fermion pair production at e−e+superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{-}e^{+}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT linear collider experiments in GUT inspired gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 1, (2020) 015029, arXiv:2006.02157 [hep-ph].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Signals of W’ and Z’ bosons at the LHC in the SU(3)×SO(5)×U(1) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 5, (2022) 055015, arXiv:2111.05624 [hep-ph].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Single Higgs boson production at electron-positron colliders in gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 7, (2023) 075030, arXiv:2301.07833 [hep-ph].
- N. Yamatsu, S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, and Y. Orikasa, “W and Z boson pair production at electron-positron colliders in gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 11, (2023) 115014, arXiv:2309.01132 [hep-ph].
- S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, and Y. Orikasa, “Distinct signals of the gauge-Higgs unification in e+e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collider experiments”, Phys. Lett. B775 (2017) 297–302, arXiv:1705.05282 [hep-ph].
- Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, “Gauge–Higgs grand unification”, PTEP 2015 (2015) 111B01, arXiv:1504.03817 [hep-ph].
- A. Furui, Y. Hosotani, and N. Yamatsu, “Toward Realistic Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification”, PTEP 2016 no. 9, (2016) 093B01, arXiv:1606.07222 [hep-ph].
- P. Bambade et al., “The International Linear Collider: A Global Project”, arXiv:1903.01629 [hep-ex].
- J.-C. Brient and H. Videau, “The Calorimetry at the future e+ e- linear collider”, eConf C010630 (2001) E3047, arXiv:hep-ex/0202004 [hep-ex].
- M. A. Thomson, “Particle Flow Calorimetry and the PandoraPFA Algorithm”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 25–40, arXiv:0907.3577 [physics.ins-det].
- LCTPC Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., “Double-hit separation and dE/dx resolution of a time projection chamber with GEM readout”, JINST 17 no. 11, (2022) P11027, arXiv:2205.12160 [physics.ins-det].
- M. Frank, F. Gaede, C. Grefe, and P. Mato, “DD4hep: A Detector Description Toolkit for High Energy Physics Experiments”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 022010.
- GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250–303.
- J. Allison et al., “Geant4 developments and applications”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270.
- J. Allison et al., “Recent developments in Geant4”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A835 (2016) 186–225.
- W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, “WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC”, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1742, arXiv:0708.4233 [hep-ph].
- T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, “Pythia 6.4 physics and manual”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006 no. 05, (May, 2006) 026–026.
- D. Schulte, “Beam-beam simulations with Guinea-Pig”, eConf C980914 (1998) 127–131. https://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C980914/papers/F-Th24.pdf.
- P. Chen, T. L. Barklow, and M. E. Peskin, “Hadron production in collisions as a background for linear colliders”, Physical Review D 49 no. 7, (1994) .
- LCC Collaboration, M. Berggren, “Generating the full SM at linear colliders”, PoS ICHEP2020 (2021) 903, arXiv:2105.04049 [hep-ex].
- F. Gaede, S. Aplin, R. Glattauer, C. Rosemann, and G. Voutsinas, “Track reconstruction at the ILC: the ILD tracking software”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 513 no. 2, (Jun, 2014) 022011.
- J. S. Marshall and M. A. Thomson, “The Pandora Software Development Kit for Pattern Recognition”, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 no. 9, (2015) 439, arXiv:1506.05348 [physics.data-an].
- T. Suehara and T. Tanabe, “LCFIPlus: A Framework for Jet Analysis in Linear Collider Studies”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 808 (2016) 109–116, arXiv:1506.08371 [physics.ins-det].
- M. Boronat, J. Fuster, I. Garcia, P. Roloff, R. Simoniello, and M. Vos, “Jet reconstruction at high-energy electron–positron colliders”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 2, (2018) 144, arXiv:1607.05039 [hep-ex].
- J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization”, in Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 vol.4. 1995.
- A. Kolmogorov, “Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilita”, Giorn. Ist. Ital. Attuari 4 (1933) 1–11.
- N. Smirnov, “Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions”, The annals of mathematical statistics 19 no. 2, (1948) 279–281.
- J. Hodges Jr, “The significance probability of the smirnov two-sample test”, Arkiv för matematik 3 no. 5, (1958) 469–486.
- T. W. Anderson and D. A. Darling, “Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness of fit" criteria based on stochastic processes”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23 no. 2, (1952) 193–212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2236446.
- T. W. Anderson and D. A. Darling, “A test of goodness of fit”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 no. 268, (1954) 765–769.
- S. Engmann and D. Cousineau, “Comparing distributions: the two-sample anderson-darling test as an alternative to the kolmogorov-smirnoff test.”, Journal of applied quantitative methods 6 no. 3, (2011) .
- J. Alcaraz Maestre, “Revisiting QCD corrections to the forward-backward charge asymmetry of heavy quarks in electron-positron collisions at the Z pole: really a problem?”, arXiv:2010.08604 [hep-ph].
- Phd dissertation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 2019.
- Particle Data Group, P. A. Zyla et al., “Review of Particle Physics”, PTEP 2020 no. 8, (2020) 083C01.
- ILC International Development Team Collaboration, A. Aryshev et al., “The International Linear Collider: Report to Snowmass 2021”, arXiv:2203.07622 [physics.acc-ph].
- A. Irles, R. Poeschl, F. Richard, and H. Yamamoto, “Complementarity between ILC250 and ILC-GigaZ”, in Linear Collider Community Meeting Lausanne, Switzerland, April 8-9, 2019. 2019. arXiv:1905.00220 [hep-ex].
- Positron Working Group, W. Gai et al., “Report on the ILC Positron Source”,. https://edmsdirect.desy.de/item/D00000001165115.
- CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for tt¯Ht¯tH\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H}roman_t over¯ start_ARG roman_t end_ARG roman_H production in the H→bb¯→Hb¯b\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}roman_H → roman_b over¯ start_ARG roman_b end_ARG decay channel with leptonic tt¯t¯t\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}roman_t over¯ start_ARG roman_t end_ARG decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, JHEP 03 (2019) 026, arXiv:1804.03682 [hep-ex].
- ATLAS Collaboration, “Graph Neural Network Jet Flavour Tagging with the ATLAS Detector”,.
- I. Brivio and M. Trott, “The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory”, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1–98, arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph].
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.