Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Probing gauge-Higgs Unification models at the ILC with quark-antiquark forward-backward asymmetry at center-of-mass energies above the Z mass

Published 14 Mar 2024 in hep-ph and hep-ex | (2403.09144v3)

Abstract: The International Linear Collider (ILC) will allow the precise study of $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow q\bar{q}$ interactions at different center-of-mass energies from the $Z$-pole to 1 TeV. In this paper, we discuss the experimental prospects for measuring differential observables in $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $e{-}e{+}\rightarrow c\bar{c}$ at the ILC baseline energies, 250 and 500 GeV. The study is based on full simulation and reconstruction of the International Large Detector (ILD) concept. Two gauge-Higgs unification models predicting new high-mass resonances beyond the Standard Model are discussed. These models predict sizable deviations of the forward-backward observables at the ILC running above the $Z$ mass and with longitudinally polarized electron and positron beams. The ability of the ILC to probe these models via high-precision measurements of the forward-backward asymmetry is discussed. Alternative scenarios at other energies and beam polarization schemes are also discussed, extrapolating the estimated uncertainties from the two baseline scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex].
  2. ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex].
  3. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, S. Schael et al., “Precision electroweak measurements on the z𝑧zitalic_z resonance”, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257–454, arXiv:hep-ex/0509008 [hep-ex].
  4. A. Djouadi, G. Moreau, and F. Richard, “Resolving the A(FB)**b puzzle in an extra dimensional model with an extended gauge structure”, Nucl. Phys. B773 (2007) 43–64, arXiv:hep-ph/0610173 [hep-ph].
  5. T. Behnke, J. E. Brau, B. Foster, J. Fuster, M. Harrison, J. M. Paterson, M. Peskin, M. Stanitzki, N. Walker, and H. Yamamoto, “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary. ”, arXiv:1306.6327 [physics.acc-ph].
  6. H. Baer et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics. ”, arXiv:1306.6352 [hep-ph].
  7. C. Adolphsen et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3.I: Accelerator &\&& in the Technical Design Phase. ”, arXiv:1306.6353 [physics.acc-ph].
  8. C. Adolphsenc et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3.II: Accelerator Baseline Design. ”, arXiv:1306.6328 [physics.acc-ph].
  9. H. Abramowicz et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 4: Detectors”, arXiv:1306.6329 [physics.ins-det].
  10. ILD Concept Group, H. Abramowicz et al., “International large detector: Interim design report”, arXiv:2003.01116 [physics.ins-det].
  11. CLIC, CLICdp Collaboration, M. J. Boland et al., “Updated baseline for a staged Compact Linear Collider”, arXiv:1608.07537 [physics.acc-ph].
  12. CLIC Collaboration, J. de Blas et al., “The CLIC Potential for New Physics”, arXiv:1812.02093 [hep-ph].
  13. CLICdp, CLIC Collaboration, T. K. Charles et al., “The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report”, arXiv:1812.06018 [physics.acc-ph].
  14. FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 ”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 6, (2019) 474.
  15. FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2”, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 2, (2019) 261–623.
  16. CEPC Study Group, “CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 1 - Accelerator”, arXiv:1809.00285 [physics.acc-ph].
  17. CEPC Study Group, M. Dong et al., “CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector”, arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex].
  18. C. Vernieri et al., “Strategy for Understanding the Higgs Physics: The Cool Copper Collider”, JINST 18 no. 07, (2023) P07053, arXiv:2203.07646 [hep-ex].
  19. A. Irles, R. Pöschl, and F. Richard, “Experimental methods and prospects on the measurement of electroweak b𝑏bitalic_b and c𝑐citalic_c-quark observables at the ILC operating at 250 GeV”, arXiv:2306.11413 [hep-ex].
  20. A. Irles and J. P. Marquez, “Experimental prospects for precision observables in e−⁢e+→q⁢q¯→superscript𝑒superscript𝑒𝑞¯𝑞e^{-}e^{+}\rightarrow q\bar{q}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_q over¯ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG with q=b,c𝑞𝑏𝑐q=b,citalic_q = italic_b , italic_c processes at the ILC operating at 250 and 500 GeV of center of mass”, in International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders. 7, 2023. arXiv:2307.14888 [hep-ex].
  21. K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The Minimal composite Higgs model ”, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165–187, arXiv:hep-ph/0412089.
  22. A. D. Medina, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Gauge-Higgs Unification and Radiative Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in Warped Extra Dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095010, arXiv:0706.1281 [hep-ph].
  23. Y. Hosotani, K. Oda, T. Ohnuma, and Y. Sakamura, “Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in SO(5) x U(1) Gauge-Higgs Unification with Top and Bottom Quarks”, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 096002, arXiv:0806.0480 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 079902 (2009)].
  24. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and T. Shimotani, “LHC signals of the S⁢O⁢(5)×U⁢(1)𝑆𝑂5𝑈1SO(5)\times U(1)italic_S italic_O ( 5 ) × italic_U ( 1 ) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 9, (2014) 095019, arXiv:1404.2748 [hep-ph].
  25. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “GUT inspired S⁢O⁢(5)×U⁢(1)×S⁢U⁢(3)𝑆𝑂5𝑈1𝑆𝑈3SO(5)\times U(1)\times SU(3)italic_S italic_O ( 5 ) × italic_U ( 1 ) × italic_S italic_U ( 3 ) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 9, (2019) 095010, arXiv:1902.01603 [hep-ph].
  26. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Fermion pair production at e−⁢e+superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{-}e^{+}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT linear collider experiments in GUT inspired gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 1, (2020) 015029, arXiv:2006.02157 [hep-ph].
  27. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Signals of W’ and Z’ bosons at the LHC in the SU(3)×SO(5)×U(1) gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 5, (2022) 055015, arXiv:2111.05624 [hep-ph].
  28. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, “Single Higgs boson production at electron-positron colliders in gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 7, (2023) 075030, arXiv:2301.07833 [hep-ph].
  29. N. Yamatsu, S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, and Y. Orikasa, “W and Z boson pair production at electron-positron colliders in gauge-Higgs unification”, Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 11, (2023) 115014, arXiv:2309.01132 [hep-ph].
  30. S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, and Y. Orikasa, “Distinct signals of the gauge-Higgs unification in e+⁢e−superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{+}e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collider experiments”, Phys. Lett. B775 (2017) 297–302, arXiv:1705.05282 [hep-ph].
  31. Y. Hosotani and N. Yamatsu, “Gauge–Higgs grand unification”, PTEP 2015 (2015) 111B01, arXiv:1504.03817 [hep-ph].
  32. A. Furui, Y. Hosotani, and N. Yamatsu, “Toward Realistic Gauge-Higgs Grand Unification”, PTEP 2016 no. 9, (2016) 093B01, arXiv:1606.07222 [hep-ph].
  33. P. Bambade et al., “The International Linear Collider: A Global Project”, arXiv:1903.01629 [hep-ex].
  34. J.-C. Brient and H. Videau, “The Calorimetry at the future e+ e- linear collider”, eConf C010630 (2001) E3047, arXiv:hep-ex/0202004 [hep-ex].
  35. M. A. Thomson, “Particle Flow Calorimetry and the PandoraPFA Algorithm”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 25–40, arXiv:0907.3577 [physics.ins-det].
  36. LCTPC Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., “Double-hit separation and dE/dx resolution of a time projection chamber with GEM readout”, JINST 17 no. 11, (2022) P11027, arXiv:2205.12160 [physics.ins-det].
  37. M. Frank, F. Gaede, C. Grefe, and P. Mato, “DD4hep: A Detector Description Toolkit for High Energy Physics Experiments”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513 (2014) 022010.
  38. GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250–303.
  39. J. Allison et al., “Geant4 developments and applications”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270.
  40. J. Allison et al., “Recent developments in Geant4”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A835 (2016) 186–225.
  41. W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, “WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC”, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1742, arXiv:0708.4233 [hep-ph].
  42. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, “Pythia 6.4 physics and manual”, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006 no. 05, (May, 2006) 026–026.
  43. D. Schulte, “Beam-beam simulations with Guinea-Pig”, eConf C980914 (1998) 127–131. https://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C980914/papers/F-Th24.pdf.
  44. P. Chen, T. L. Barklow, and M. E. Peskin, “Hadron production in collisions as a background for linear colliders”, Physical Review D 49 no. 7, (1994) .
  45. LCC Collaboration, M. Berggren, “Generating the full SM at linear colliders”, PoS ICHEP2020 (2021) 903, arXiv:2105.04049 [hep-ex].
  46. F. Gaede, S. Aplin, R. Glattauer, C. Rosemann, and G. Voutsinas, “Track reconstruction at the ILC: the ILD tracking software”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 513 no. 2, (Jun, 2014) 022011.
  47. J. S. Marshall and M. A. Thomson, “The Pandora Software Development Kit for Pattern Recognition”, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 no. 9, (2015) 439, arXiv:1506.05348 [physics.data-an].
  48. T. Suehara and T. Tanabe, “LCFIPlus: A Framework for Jet Analysis in Linear Collider Studies”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 808 (2016) 109–116, arXiv:1506.08371 [physics.ins-det].
  49. M. Boronat, J. Fuster, I. Garcia, P. Roloff, R. Simoniello, and M. Vos, “Jet reconstruction at high-energy electron–positron colliders”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 2, (2018) 144, arXiv:1607.05039 [hep-ex].
  50. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization”, in Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948 vol.4. 1995.
  51. A. Kolmogorov, “Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilita”, Giorn. Ist. Ital. Attuari 4 (1933) 1–11.
  52. N. Smirnov, “Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions”, The annals of mathematical statistics 19 no. 2, (1948) 279–281.
  53. J. Hodges Jr, “The significance probability of the smirnov two-sample test”, Arkiv för matematik 3 no. 5, (1958) 469–486.
  54. T. W. Anderson and D. A. Darling, “Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness of fit" criteria based on stochastic processes”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23 no. 2, (1952) 193–212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2236446.
  55. T. W. Anderson and D. A. Darling, “A test of goodness of fit”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 no. 268, (1954) 765–769.
  56. S. Engmann and D. Cousineau, “Comparing distributions: the two-sample anderson-darling test as an alternative to the kolmogorov-smirnoff test.”, Journal of applied quantitative methods 6 no. 3, (2011) .
  57. J. Alcaraz Maestre, “Revisiting QCD corrections to the forward-backward charge asymmetry of heavy quarks in electron-positron collisions at the Z pole: really a problem?”, arXiv:2010.08604 [hep-ph].
  58. Phd dissertation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 2019.
  59. Particle Data Group, P. A. Zyla et al., “Review of Particle Physics”, PTEP 2020 no. 8, (2020) 083C01.
  60. ILC International Development Team Collaboration, A. Aryshev et al., “The International Linear Collider: Report to Snowmass 2021”, arXiv:2203.07622 [physics.acc-ph].
  61. A. Irles, R. Poeschl, F. Richard, and H. Yamamoto, “Complementarity between ILC250 and ILC-GigaZ”, in Linear Collider Community Meeting Lausanne, Switzerland, April 8-9, 2019. 2019. arXiv:1905.00220 [hep-ex].
  62. Positron Working Group, W. Gai et al., “Report on the ILC Positron Source”,. https://edmsdirect.desy.de/item/D00000001165115.
  63. CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for t⁢t¯⁢Ht¯tH\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H}roman_t over¯ start_ARG roman_t end_ARG roman_H production in the H→b⁢b¯→Hb¯b\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}roman_H → roman_b over¯ start_ARG roman_b end_ARG decay channel with leptonic t⁢t¯t¯t\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}roman_t over¯ start_ARG roman_t end_ARG decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV”, JHEP 03 (2019) 026, arXiv:1804.03682 [hep-ex].
  64. ATLAS Collaboration, “Graph Neural Network Jet Flavour Tagging with the ATLAS Detector”,.
  65. I. Brivio and M. Trott, “The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory”, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1–98, arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph].
Citations (2)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.