Boundary geometry controls a topological defect transition that determines lumen nucleation in embryonic development
Abstract: Topological defects determine the collective properties of anisotropic materials. How their configurations are controlled is not well understood however, especially in 3D. In living matter moreover, 2D defects have been linked to biological functions, but the role of 3D polar defects is unclear. Combining computational and experimental approaches, we investigate how confinement geometry controls surface-aligned polar fluids, and what biological role 3D polar defects play in tissues interacting with extracellular boundaries. We discover a charge-preserving transition between 3D defect configurations driven by boundary geometry and independent of material parameters, and show that defect positions predict the locations where fluid-filled lumina -- structures essential for development -- form within the confined polar tissue of the mouse embryo. Experimentally perturbing embryo shape beyond the transition point, we moreover create additional lumina at predicted defect locations. Our work reveals how boundary geometry controls polar defects, and how embryos use this mechanism for shape-dependent lumen formation. We expect this defect control principle to apply broadly to systems with orientational order.
- I. Nys, Liquid Crystals Today 29, 65 (2020).
- M. Daïeff, Elveflow (2020).
- P. Sheng, Physical Review Letters 37, 1059 (1976).
- P. Sheng, Physical Review A 26, 1610 (1982).
- N. Akhtar and C. H. Streuli, Nature Cell Biology 15, 17 (2013).
- C. F. Davey and C. B. Moens, Development 144, 187 (2017).
- M. T. Butler and J. B. Wallingford, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell biology 18, 375 (2017).
- F. N. Vicente and A. Diz-Muñoz, Current Opinion in Systems Biology , 100446 (2023).
- C. E. Buckley and D. St Johnston, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell biology 23, 559 (2022).
- A. Ardaševa and A. Doostmohammadi, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 354 (2022).
- I. Bedzhov and M. Zernicka-Goetz, Cell 156, 1032 (2014).
- P.-G. De Gennes, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 12, 193 (1971).
- J. V. Selinger, Liquid Crystals Reviews 6, 129 (2018).
- A. Rapini and M. Papoular, Le Journal de Physique Colloques 30, C4 (1969).
- P. Prinsen and P. Van Der Schoot, Physical Review E 68, 021701 (2003).
- N. J. Mottram and C. J. Newton, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.3542 (2014).
- A. Mertelj and D. Lisjak, Liquid Crystals Reviews 5, 1 (2017).
- M. Ravnik and S. Žumer, Liquid Crystals 36, 1201 (2009).
- I. I. Smalyukh, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9, 207 (2018).
- G. Volovik and O. Lavrentovich, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 85, 1997 (1983).
- S. Mkaddem and E. Gartland Jr, Physical Review E 62, 6694 (2000).
- J. Ahlers, D. Althviz Moré, O. Amsalem, A. Anderson, G. Bokota, P. Boone, J. a. Bragantini, G. Buckley, A. Burt, M. Bussonnier, et al., “napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for python,” (2023).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.