Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Measures of relevance to the success of streaming platforms

Published 13 Mar 2024 in econ.TH and cs.GT | (2403.08421v1)

Abstract: Digital streaming platforms, including Twitch, Spotify, Netflix, Disney, and Kindle, have emerged as one of the main sources of entertainment with significant growth potential. Many of these platforms distribute royalties among streamers, artists, producers, or writers based on their impact. In this paper, we measure the relevance of each of these contributors to the overall success of the platform, which is information that can play a key role in revenue allocation. We perform an axiomatic analysis to provide normative foundations for three relevance metrics: the uniform, the proportional, and the subscriber-proportional indicators. The last two indicators implement the so-called pro-rata and user-centric models, which are extensively applied to distribute revenues in the music streaming market. The axioms we propose formalize different principles of fairness, stability, and non-manipulability, and are tailor-made for the streaming context. We complete our analysis with a case study that measures the influence of the 19 most-followed streamers worldwide on the Twitch platform.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90:475–497.
  2. Revenue-Sharing Allocation Strategies for Two-Sided Media Platforms: Pro-Rata vs. User-Centric. Management Science, 68:8699–8721.
  3. Identification of low intratumoral gene expression heterogeneity in neuroblastic tumors by genome-wide expression analysis and game theory. Cancer, 113:1412–1422.
  4. Horizontal cooperation in a multimodal public transport system: The profit allocation problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 275:659–665..
  5. Handbook of the Shapley value. CRC Press.
  6. The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from museum passes. Games and Economic Behavior, 89:78–92.
  7. ——— (2023). An axiomatic approach to the revenue sharing in the streaming industry. 22nd annual SAET Conference Paris, France.
  8. The value of attribution. Nature Climate Change, 1:70–71.
  9. The law and science of climate change attribution. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 5:57–240.
  10. Dimont, J. (2017). Royalty inequity: Why music streaming services should switch to a per-subscriber model. CU Hastings Law Journal, 69:675–700.
  11. The museum pass game and its value. Games and Economic Behavior, 43:322–325.
  12. Jari, M. (2018). Pro-rata and user-centric distribution models: A comparative study. Technical report.
  13. Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations. Journal of Economic Theory, 132:1–16.
  14. Allocating revenues in a Smart TV ecosystem. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26:1611–1632.
  15. ——— (2023). Dynamic generation and attribution of revenues in a video platform. ArXiv, 4859841 [math.OC].
  16. The Shapley and Banzhaf values in microarray games. Computers & Operations Research, 37:1406–1412.
  17. Fair dynamic rationing. Management Science, forthcoming.
  18. An axiomatic approach towards pandemic performance indicators. Economic Modelling, 116:105983.
  19. Mathematical indices for the influence of risk factors on the lethality of a disease. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 83:74.
  20. Order preservation with dummies in the museum pass problem. Annals of Operations Research, forthcoming.
  21. Assessments in public procurement procedures. Omega, 111:102660.
  22. Consequences of platforms’ remuneration models for digital content: initial evidence and a research agenda for streaming services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51:114–131.
  23. The class of microarray games and the relevance index for genes. TOP, 15:256–280.
  24. O’Neill, B. (1982). A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical social sciences, 2:345–371.
  25. Money in, money out: lessons from cmos in allocating and distributing licensing revenue. Technical report.
  26. ——— (2018b). User-centric revisited: The unintended consequences ofroyalty distribution. Technical report.
  27. Roth, A. E. (1988). The Shapley value: essays in honor of Lloyd S. Shapley. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Shapley, L.S. (1953). A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2:307–317.
  29. Shapley meets uniform: An axiomatic framework for attribution in online advertising. Management Science, 68:7457–7479.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.