Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Parameter Constraints on Traversable Wormholes within Beyond Horndeski Theories through Quasi-Periodic Oscillations

Published 13 Mar 2024 in gr-qc | (2403.08356v1)

Abstract: {\it Hunting} compact astrophysical objects such as black holes and wormholes, as well as testing gravity theories, are important issues in relativistic astrophysics. In this sense, theoretical and observational studies of quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) observed in (micro)quasars become helpful in exploring their central object, which can be a black hole or a wormhole. In the present work, we study the throat properties of traversable wormholes beyond Horndeski theory. Also, we investigate the circular motion of test particles orbiting the wormhole. We analyze the test particle's effective potential and angular momentum for circular orbits. Frequencies of radial and vertical oscillations of the particles around stable circular orbits have also been studied and applied in explaining the quasiperiodic oscillations mechanism in the relativistic precession (RP) model. Finally, we obtain constraint values for the parameters of Horndeski gravity and the mass of the wormhole candidates using QPOs observed in the microquasars GRO J1655-40, GRS 1915+105 & XTE J1550-564 and at the center of Milky Way galaxy through Monte-Carlo-Markovian-Chain (MCMC) analyses.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel. 9, 3 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0510072 .
  2. C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
  3. E. Berti et al., Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc] .
  4. G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363 (1974).
  5. C. Deffayet and D. A. Steer, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 214006 (2013), arXiv:1307.2450 [hep-th] .
  6. D. Langlois and K. Noui, JCAP 02, 034 (2016), arXiv:1510.06930 [gr-qc] .
  7. D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys. B 291, 41 (1987).
  8. R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B 293, 385 (1987).
  9. D. Hochberg, Phys. Lett. B 251, 349 (1990).
  10. K. Ghoroku and T. Soma, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1507 (1992).
  11. F. S. N. Lobo and M. A. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104012 (2009), arXiv:0909.5539 [gr-qc] .
  12. C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D 87, 107501 (2013), arXiv:1304.5691 [gr-qc] .
  13. C. Chakraborty and P. Pradhan, JCAP 03, 035 (2017), arXiv:1603.09683 [gr-qc] .
  14. L. Stella and M. Vietri, The Astrophys Jour Lett 492, L59 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709085 [astro-ph] .
  15. Z. Stuchlík and J. Vrba, Universe 7, 279 (2021a), arXiv:2108.09562 [gr-qc] .
  16. Z. Stuchlík and J. Vrba, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 1127 (2021b), arXiv:2110.10569 [gr-qc] .
  17. V. De Falco, Phys. Rev. D 108, 024051 (2023), arXiv:2307.03151 [gr-qc] .
  18. H. Lu and Y. Pang, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135717 (2020), arXiv:2003.11552 [gr-qc] .
  19. M. Zumalacárregui and J. García-Bellido, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064046 (2014), arXiv:1308.4685 [gr-qc] .
  20. R. A. Remillard and J. E. McClintock, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 44, 49 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0606352 [astro-ph] .
Citations (3)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.