Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Entanglement detection in postquench nonequilibrium states: thermal Gibbs vs. generalized Gibbs ensemble

Published 20 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.stat-mech | (2403.07897v1)

Abstract: We use entanglement witnesses related to the entanglement negativity of the state to detect entanglement in the $XY$ chain in the postquench states in the thermodynamic limit after a quench when the parameters of the Hamiltonian are changed suddenly. The entanglement negativity is related to correlations, which in the postquench stationary state are described by a generalized Gibbs ensemble, in the ideal case. If, however, integrability breaking perturbations are present, the system is expected to thermalize. Here we compare the nearest-neighbor entanglement in the two circumstances.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
  2. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  3. P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
  4. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
  5. B. M. Terhal, Bell inequalities and the separability criterion, Phys. Lett. A 271, 319 (2000).
  6. G. Tóth, Entanglement witnesses in spin models, Phys. Rev. A 71, 010301(R) (2005).
  7. G. Tóth and O. Gühne, Detection of multipartite entanglement with two-body correlations, Appl. Phys. B 82, 237 (2006).
  8. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Energy and multipartite entanglement in multidimensional and frustrated spin models, Phys. Rev. A 73, 052319 (2006).
  9. O. Gühne, G. Tóth, and H. J. Briegel, Multipartite entanglement in spin chains, New J. Phys. 7, 229 (2005).
  10. C. Brukner and V. Vedral, Macroscopic Thermodynamical Witnesses of Quantum Entanglement, arXiv: quant-ph/0406040  (2004).
  11. M. R. Dowling, A. C. Doherty, and S. D. Bartlett, Energy as an entanglement witness for quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062113 (2004).
  12. T. Vértesi and E. Bene, Thermal entanglement in the nanotubular system Na2⁢V3⁢O7subscriptNa2subscriptV3subscriptO7{\mathrm{Na}}_{2}{\mathrm{V}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}roman_Na start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Phys. Rev. B 73, 134404 (2006).
  13. I. Siloi and F. Troiani, Towards the chemical tuning of entanglement in molecular nanomagnets, Phys. Rev. B 86, 224404 (2012).
  14. I. Siloi and F. Troiani, Quantum entanglement in heterometallic wheels, Eur. Phys. J. B 86, 71 (2013).
  15. F. Troiani and I. Siloi, Energy as a witness of multipartite entanglement in chains of arbitrary spins, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032330 (2012).
  16. T. Homayoun and K. Aghayar, Energy as an entanglement witnesses for one dimensional XYZ Heisenberg lattice: Optimization approach, J. Stat. Phys. 176, 85 (2019).
  17. F. Troiani, S. Carretta, and P. Santini, Detection of entanglement between collective spins, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195421 (2013).
  18. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  19. E. Barouch, B. M. McCoy, and M. Dresden, Statistical mechanics of the XYXY\mathrm{XY}roman_XY model. I, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1075 (1970).
  20. E. Barouch and B. M. McCoy, Statistical mechanics of the XYXY\mathrm{XY}roman_XY model. III, Phys. Rev. A 3, 2137 (1971).
  21. F. Iglói and H. Rieger, Long-range correlations in the nonequilibrium quantum relaxation of a spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3233 (2000).
  22. K. Sengupta, S. Powell, and S. Sachdev, Quench dynamics across quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. A 69, 053616 (2004).
  23. S. Sotiriadis, D. Fioretto, and G. Mussardo, Zamolodchikov–Faddeev algebra and quantum quenches in integrable field theories, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2012 (02), P02017.
  24. G. Roux, Quenches in quantum many-body systems: One-dimensional bose-hubbard model reexamined, Phys. Rev. A 79, 021608 (2009).
  25. S. Sotiriadis, P. Calabrese, and J. Cardy, Quantum quench from a thermal initial state, Europhysics Letters 87, 20002 (2009).
  26. M. Kollar and M. Eckstein, Relaxation of a one-dimensional mott insulator after an interaction quench, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013626 (2008).
  27. T. Barthel and U. Schollwöck, Dephasing and the steady state in quantum many-particle systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 100601 (2008).
  28. M. A. Cazalilla, Effect of suddenly turning on interactions in the Luttinger model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 156403 (2006).
  29. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Time dependence of correlation functions following a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136801 (2006).
  30. R. Hamazaki, T. N. Ikeda, and M. Ueda, Generalized Gibbs ensemble in a nonintegrable system with an extensive number of local symmetries, Phys. Rev. E 93, 032116 (2016).
  31. J. Larson, Integrability versus quantum thermalization, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 224016 (2013).
  32. V. A. Yurovsky and M. Olshanii, Memory of the initial conditions in an incompletely chaotic quantum system: Universal predictions with application to cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 025303 (2011).
  33. L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2016 (6), 064007.
  34. F. H. L. Essler, G. Mussardo, and M. Panfil, Generalized Gibbs ensembles for quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. A 91, 051602 (2015).
  35. B. Pozsgay, Quantum quenches and generalized Gibbs ensemble in a bethe ansatz solvable lattice model of interacting bosons, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2014 (10), P10045.
  36. B. Pozsgay, Failure of the generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis in integrable models with multiple particle species, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2014 (9), P09026.
  37. G. Goldstein and N. Andrei, Failure of the local generalized Gibbs ensemble for integrable models with bound states, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043625 (2014).
  38. P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, Quantum quench in the transverse field ising chain: I. time evolution of order parameter correlators, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2012 (07), P07016.
  39. B. Blass, H. Rieger, and F. Iglói, Quantum relaxation and finite-size effects in the XY chain in a transverse field after global quenches, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 99, 30004 (2012).
  40. J. Berges, S. Borsányi, and C. Wetterich, Prethermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 142002 (2004).
  41. M. Kollar, F. A. Wolf, and M. Eckstein, Generalized gibbs ensemble prediction of prethermalization plateaus and their relation to nonthermal steady states in integrable systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054304 (2011).
  42. T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Prethermalization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016, 064009 (2016).
  43. K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, and W. De Roeck, Prethermalization and thermalization in isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021027 (2019).
  44. F. M. Surace and O. Motrunich, Weak integrability breaking perturbations of integrable models (2023), arXiv:2302.12804 [cond-mat.stat-mech] .
  45. T. J. Osborne and M. A. Nielsen, Entanglement in a simple quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032110 (2002).
  46. D. Patanè, R. Fazio, and L. Amico, Bound entanglement in the XY model, New J. Phys. 9, 322 (2007).
  47. M. Hofmann, A. Osterloh, and O. Gühne, Scaling of genuine multiparticle entanglement close to a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134101 (2014).
  48. S. M. Giampaolo and B. C. Hiesmayr, Genuine multipartite entanglement in the x⁢y𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y model, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052305 (2013).
  49. F. Iglói and G. Tóth, Entanglement witnesses in the x⁢y𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y chain: Thermal equilibrium and postquench nonequilibrium states, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013158 (2023).
  50. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys 16, 407 (1961).
  51. P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a transverse field, Ann. Phys. 57, 79 (1970).
  52. M. Rigol, Quantum quenches and thermalization in one-dimensional fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. A 80, 053607 (2009).
  53. L. Foini, L. F. Cugliandolo, and A. Gambassi, Fluctuation-dissipation relations and critical quenches in the transverse field ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 84, 212404 (2011).
  54. B. M. Terhal, Detecting quantum entanglement, Theor. Comput. Sci. 287, 313 (2002).
  55. E. B. Fel’dman and A. N. Pyrkov, Evolution of spin entanglement and an entanglement witness in multiple-quantum nmr experiments, JETP Letters 88, 398 (2008).
  56. M. Gärttner, P. Hauke, and A. M. Rey, Relating out-of-time-order correlations to entanglement via multiple-quantum coherences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 040402 (2018).
  57. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a “bound” entanglement in nature?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998).
  58. A. Sanpera, R. Tarrach, and G. Vidal, Local description of quantum inseparability, Phys. Rev. A 58, 826 (1998).
  59. S. Rana, Negative eigenvalues of partial transposition of arbitrary bipartite states, Phys. Rev. A 87, 054301 (2013).
  60. A. Lamacraft, Quantum quenches in a spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160404 (2007).
  61. T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum newton’s cradle, Nature (London) 440, 900 (2006).
  62. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  63. S. Paul, P. Titum, and M. F. Maghrebi, Hidden quantum criticality and entanglement in quench dynamics, arXiv:2202.04654  (2022).
  64. V. Eisler and Z. Zimborás, On the partial transpose of fermionic gaussian states, New J. Phys. 17, 053048 (2015).
  65. J. Eisert, V. Eisler, and Z. Zimborás, Entanglement negativity bounds for fermionic gaussian states, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165123 (2018).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.