Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the locomotion of the slider within a self-adaptive beam-slider system

Published 12 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2403.07423v1)

Abstract: A beam-slider system is considered whose passive self-adaption relies on an intricate locomotion process involving both frictional and unilateral contact. The system also exploits geometric nonlinearity to achieve broadband efficacy. The dynamics of the system take place on three distinct time scales: On the fast time scale of the harmonic base excitation are the vibrations and the locomotion cycle. On the slow time scale, the slider changes its position along the beam, and the overall vibration level varies. Finally, on an intermediate time scale, strong modulations of the vibration amplitude may take place. In the present work, first, an analytical approximation of the beam's response on the slow time scale is derived as function of the slider position, which is a crucial prerequisite for identifying the main drivers of the slider's locomotion. Then, the most important forms of locomotion are described and approximations of their individual contribution to the overall slider transport are estimated. Finally, the theoretical results are compared against numerical results obtained from an experimentally validated model.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. F. Müller, M. W. Beck, and M. Krack, “Experimental validation of a model for a self-adaptive beam–slider system,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 182, p. 109551, 2023.
  2. L. M. Miller, P. Pillatsch, E. Halvorsen, P. K. Wright, E. M. Yeatman, and A. S. Holmes, “Experimental passive self-tuning behavior of a beam resonator with sliding proof mass,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 332, no. 26, pp. 7142–7152, 2013.
  3. L. Yu, L. Tang, and T. Yang, “Piezoelectric passive self-tuning energy harvester based on a beam-slider structure,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 489, p. 115689, 2020.
  4. Y.-H. Shin, J. Choi, S. J. Kim, S. Kim, D. Maurya, T.-H. Sung, S. Priya, C.-Y. Kang, and H.-C. Song, “Automatic resonance tuning mechanism for ultra-wide bandwidth mechanical energy harvesting,” Nano Energy, vol. 77, p. 104986, 2020.
  5. N. Aboulfotoh, J. Twiefel, M. Krack, and J. Wallaschek, “Experimental study on performance enhancement of a piezoelectric vibration energy harvester by applying self-resonating behavior,” Energy Harvesting and Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 131–136, 2017.
  6. C. G. Gregg, P. Pillatsch, and P. K. Wright, “Passively self-tuning piezoelectric energy harvesting system,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 557, p. 012123, 2014.
  7. M. Bukhari, A. Malla, H. Kim, O. Barry, and L. Zuo, “On a self-tuning sliding-mass electromagnetic energy harvester,” AIP Advances, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 095227, 2020.
  8. C. Lihua, X. Jiangtao, P. Shiqing, and C. Liqi, “Study on cantilever piezoelectric energy harvester with tunable function,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 29, no. 7, p. 075001, 2020.
  9. L. Staaf, A. D. Smith, E. Köhler, P. Lundgren, P. D. Folkow, and P. Enoksson, “Achieving increased bandwidth for 4 degree of freedom self-tuning energy harvester,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 420, pp. 165–173, 2018.
  10. L. Yu, L. Tang, and T. Yang, “Experimental investigation of a passive self-tuning resonator based on a beam-slider structure,” Acta Mechanica Sinica, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1079–1092, 2019.
  11. J. J. Thomsen, “Vibration suppression by using self-arranging mass: Effects of adding restoring force,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 197, no. 4, pp. 403–425, 1996.
  12. E. C. Miranda and J. J. Thomsen, “Vibration induced sliding: Theory and experiment for a beam with a spring-loaded mass,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 167–186, 1998.
  13. P. Pillatsch, L. M. Miller, E. Halvorsen, P. K. Wright, E. M. Yeatman, and A. S. Holmes, “Self-tuning behavior of a clamped-clamped beam with sliding proof mass for broadband energy harvesting,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 476, p. 012068, 2013.
  14. M. Krack, N. Aboulfotoh, J. Twiefel, J. Wallaschek, L. A. Bergman, and A. F. Vakakis, “Toward understanding the self-adaptive dynamics of a harmonically forced beam with a sliding mass,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 699–720, 2017.
  15. F. Müller and M. Krack, “Explanation of the self-adaptive dynamics of a harmonically forced beam with a sliding mass,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1569–1582, 2020.
  16. F. Müller, “On the self-adaptive dynamics of a strongly nonlinear beam-slider system.” Dissertation, 2023.
  17. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009.
  18. O. V. Gendelman and A. Alloni, “Dynamics of forced system with vibro-impact energy sink,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 358, pp. 301–314, 2015.
  19. R. I. Leine, D. H. van Campen, and C. H. Glocker, “Nonlinear dynamics and modeling of various wooden toys with impact and friction,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 25–78, 2003.
  20. H. Preuschoft and B. Demes, “Influence of size and proportions on the biomechanics of brachiation,” in Size and Scaling in Primate Biology (W. L. Jungers, ed.), pp. 383–399, Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985.
  21. H. Preuschoft, Understanding Body Shapes of Animals. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.