Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale optical quantum entanglement toward ultrafast quantum information processing
Abstract: Entanglement is a fundamental resource of various optical quantum-information-processing (QIP) applications. Towards high-speed QIP system, entanglement should be encoded in short wavepackets. We report real-time observation of ultrafast optical Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlation at a picosecond timescale in a continuous-wave (CW) system. Optical phase-sensitive amplification using 6-THz-bandwidth waveguide-optical-parametric amplifier enhances the effective efficiency of 70-GHz-bandwidth homodyne detectors, mainly used in 5th-generation telecommunication, enabling its use in real-time quantum-state measurement. While power measurement using frequency scanning, i.e., optical spectrum analyzer, is not performed in real-time, our observation is demonstrated through real-time amplitude measurement and can be directly employed in QIP applications. Observed EPR states show quantum correlation of 4.5 dB below shotnoise level encoded in wavepackets with 40-ps period, equivalent to 25-GHz repetition -- ${103}$ times faster than previous entanglement observation in CW system. The quantum correlation of 4.5 dB is already sufficient for several QIP applications, and our system can be readily extended to large-scale entanglement. Moreover, our scheme has high compatibility with optical communication technology such as wavelength-division multiplexing, and femtosecond-timescale observation is also feasible. Our demonstration is paradigm shift in accelerating accessible quantum correlation, the foundational resource of all quantum applications, from the nanosecond to picosecond timescale, enabling ultra-fast optical QIP.
- A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” In Phys. Rev. 47 American Physical Society, 1935, pp. 777–780 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
- E. Schrödinger “Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems” In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31.4 Cambridge University Press, 1935, pp. 555–563 DOI: 10.1017/S0305004100013554
- P.W. Shor “Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer” In SIAM Journal on Computing 26.5, 1997, pp. 1484–1509 DOI: 10.1137/S0097539795293172
- “Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer” In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 400.1818, 1985, pp. 97–117 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1985.0070
- “Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 American Physical Society, 1992, pp. 2881–2884 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881
- “Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 American Physical Society, 1998, pp. 5932–5935 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5932
- “Quantum communication” In Nature Photonics 1.3, 2007, pp. 165–171 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22
- “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing” In Theoretical computer science 560 Elsevier, 2014, pp. 7–11
- A.K. Ekert “Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 American Physical Society, 1991, pp. 661–663 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
- “Advances in quantum cryptography” In Adv. Opt. Photon. 12.4 Optica Publishing Group, 2020, pp. 1012–1236 DOI: 10.1364/AOP.361502
- “Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state” In Science 366.6463, 2019, pp. 373–376 DOI: 10.1126/science.aay2645
- “Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state” In Science 366.6463, 2019, pp. 369–372 DOI: 10.1126/science.aay4354
- “Quantum information with continuous variables” In Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 American Physical Society, 2005, pp. 513–577 DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513
- “Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing” In APL Photonics 4.6 AIP Publishing LLC, 2019, pp. 060902
- “Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics” In Science 377.6612, 2022, pp. 1333–1337 DOI: 10.1126/science.abo6213
- “Ultra-broadband quadrature squeezing with thin-film lithium niobate nanophotonics” In Opt. Lett. 47.6 Optica Publishing Group, 2022, pp. 1506–1509 DOI: 10.1364/OL.447695
- “Over-8-dB squeezed light generation by a broadband waveguide optical parametric amplifier toward fault-tolerant ultra-fast quantum computers” In Applied Physics Letters 122.23, 2023, pp. 234003 DOI: 10.1063/5.0144385
- Horace P. Y. and Vincent W.S. C. “Noise in homodyne and heterodyne detection” In Opt. Lett. 8.3 Optica Publishing Group, 1983, pp. 177–179 DOI: 10.1364/OL.8.000177
- “Generation of highly pure single-photon state at telecommunication wavelength” In Opt. Express 30.14 Optica Publishing Group, 2022, pp. 24831–24840 DOI: 10.1364/OE.460583
- “Waveguide Integrated Balanced Photodetectors for Coherent Receivers” In IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 24.2, 2018, pp. 1–7 DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2017.2723844
- “A quantum-bit encoding converter” In Nature Photonics 17.2, 2023, pp. 165–170 DOI: 10.1038/s41566-022-01117-5
- C.M. Caves “Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers” In Phys. Rev. D 26 American Physical Society, 1982, pp. 1817–1839 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817
- “Lifting the bandwidth limit of optical homodyne measurement with broadband parametric amplification” In Nature Communications 9.1, 2018, pp. 609 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03083-5
- “All-optical phase-sensitive detection for ultra-fast quantum computation” In Opt. Express 28.23 Optica Publishing Group, 2020, pp. 34916–34926 DOI: 10.1364/OE.405832
- “Toward a multi-core ultra-fast optical quantum processor: 43-GHz bandwidth real-time amplitude measurement of 5-dB squeezed light using modularized optical parametric amplifier with 5G technology” In Applied Physics Letters 122.10, 2023, pp. 104001 DOI: 10.1063/5.0137641
- S.M. Tan “Confirming entanglement in continuous variable quantum teleportation” In Phys. Rev. A 60 American Physical Society, 1999, pp. 2752–2758 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2752
- “Continuous-wave 6-dB-squeezed light with 2.5-THz-bandwidth from single-mode PPLN waveguide” In APL Photonics 5.3, 2020, pp. 036104 DOI: 10.1063/1.5142437
- “Inseparability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 American Physical Society, 2000, pp. 2722–2725 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722
- R. Simon “Peres-Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 American Physical Society, 2000, pp. 2726–2729 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726
- “Detecting genuine multipartite continuous-variable entanglement” In Phys. Rev. A 67 American Physical Society, 2003, pp. 052315 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052315
- Supplementary material can be found online.
- “Invited Article: Generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable cluster state by unlimited time-domain multiplexing” In APL Photonics 1.6, 2016, pp. 060801 DOI: 10.1063/1.4962732
- “Universal quantum computation with temporal-mode bilayer square lattices” In Phys. Rev. A 97 American Physical Society, 2018, pp. 032302 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032302
- “Advanced Optical Modulation Formats” In Proceedings of the IEEE 94.5, 2006, pp. 952–985 DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.873438
- “Fabrication of low-loss quasi-single-mode PPLN waveguide and its application to a modularized broadband high-level squeezer” In Applied Physics Letters 119.25, 2021, pp. 251104 DOI: 10.1063/5.0063118
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.