Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 177 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Search for $CP$-Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions with the NOvA Experiment (2403.07266v2)

Published 12 Mar 2024 in hep-ex and hep-ph

Abstract: This Letter reports a search for charge-parity ($CP$) symmetry violating nonstandard interactions (NSI) of neutrinos with matter using the NOvA Experiment, and examines their effects on the determination of the standard oscillation parameters. Data from $\nu_{\mu}(\bar{\nu}{\mu})\rightarrow\nu{\mu}(\bar{\nu}{\mu})$ and $\nu{\mu}(\bar{\nu}{\mu})\rightarrow\nu{e}(\bar{\nu}{e})$ oscillation channels are used to measure the effect of the NSI parameters $\varepsilon{e\mu}$ and $\varepsilon_{e\tau}$. With 90% CL the magnitudes of the NSI couplings are constrained to be $|\varepsilon_{e\mu}| \, \lesssim 0.3$ and $|\varepsilon_{e\tau}| \, \lesssim 0.4$. A degeneracy at $|\varepsilon_{e\tau}| \, \approx 1.8$ is reported, and we observe that the presence of NSI limits sensitivity to the standard $CP$ phase $\delta_{\tiny\text{CP}}$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 tweets and received 18 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: