2000 character limit reached
Equivariant Variational Quantum Eigensolver to detect Phase Transitions through Energy Level Crossings
Published 11 Mar 2024 in quant-ph and cond-mat.str-el | (2403.07100v3)
Abstract: Level spectroscopy stands as a powerful method for identifying the transition point that delineates distinct quantum phases. Since each quantum phase exhibits a characteristic sequence of excited states, the crossing of energy levels between low-lying excited states offers a reliable mean to estimate the phase transition point. While approaches like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver are useful for approximating ground states of interacting systems using quantum computing, capturing low-energy excitations remains challenging. In our study, we introduce an equivariant quantum circuit that preserves the total spin and the translational symmetry to accurately describe singlet and triplet excited states in the $J_1$-$J_2$ Heisenberg model on a chain, which are crucial for characterizing its transition point. Additionally, we assess the impact of noise on the variational state, showing that conventional mitigation techniques like Zero Noise Extrapolation reliably restore its physical properties.
- Subir Sachdev. “Quantum phase transitions”. Physics World 12, 33 (1999).
- S. Eggert. “Numerical evidence for multiplicative logarithmic corrections from marginal operators”. Phys. Rev. B 54, R9612–R9615 (1996).
- A.W. Sandvik. “Computational studies of quantum spin systems”. AIP Conference Proceedings 1297, 135–338 (2010).
- K Nomura. “Correlation functions of the 2d sine-gordon model”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 28, 5451 (1995).
- Masaaki Nakamura. “Mechanism of cdw-sdw transition in one dimension”. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 68, 3123–3126 (1999).
- Masaaki Nakamura. “Tricritical behavior in the extended hubbard chains”. Phys. Rev. B 61, 16377–16392 (2000).
- “Ground state phases of the half-filled one-dimensional extended hubbard model”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 236401 (2004).
- Anders W. Sandvik. “Ground states of a frustrated quantum spin chain with long-range interactions”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 137204 (2010).
- “Critical level crossings and gapless spin liquid in the square-lattice spin-1/2121/21 / 2 J1−J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2{J}_{1}-{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT heisenberg antiferromagnet”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 107202 (2018).
- “Gapless spin liquid and valence-bond solid in the J1subscript𝐽1{J}_{1}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-J2subscript𝐽2{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT heisenberg model on the square lattice: Insights from singlet and triplet excitations”. Phys. Rev. B 102, 014417 (2020).
- “Dirac-type nodal spin liquid revealed by refined quantum many-body solver using neural-network wave function, correlation ratio, and level spectroscopy”. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031034 (2021).
- Fabio Franchini. “An introduction to integrable techniques for one-dimensional quantum systems”. Springer International Publishing. (2017).
- S.R. White and I. Affleck. “Dimerization and incommensurate spiral spin correlations in the zigzag spin chain: Analogies to the kondo lattice”. Phys. Rev. B 54, 9862–9869 (1996).
- “Introduction to frustrated magnetism: Materials, experiments, theory”. Springer. (2011).
- J.V. Jos. “40 years of berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless theory”. EBL-Schweitzer. World Scientific. (2013). url: https://books.google.it/books?id=roO6CgAAQBAJ.
- “Accuracy of restricted Boltzmann machines for the one-dimensional J1−J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2J_{1}-J_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Heisenberg model”. SciPost Phys. 12, 166 (2022).
- “Transformer variational wave functions for frustrated quantum spin systems”. Physical Review Letters130 (2023).
- “Quantum criticality and spin liquid phase in the shastry-sutherland model”. Phys. Rev. B 105, L060409 (2022).
- “Plaquette ordered phase and quantum phase diagram in the spin-1212\frac{1}{2}divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG J1−J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2{J}_{1}\text{$-$}{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square heisenberg model”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027201 (2014).
- “Restricted boltzmann machines for quantum states with non-abelian or anyonic symmetries”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 097201 (2020).
- “Many-body quantum states with exact conservation of non-abelian and lattice symmetries through variational monte carlo”. Phys. Rev. B 104, 045123 (2021).
- “Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks”. Science 355, 602–606 (2017).
- Yusuke Nomura. “Helping restricted boltzmann machines with quantum-state representation by restoring symmetry”. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 174003 (2021).
- “Group convolutional neural networks improve quantum state accuracy” (2021). arXiv:2104.05085.
- “High-accuracy variational monte carlo for frustrated magnets with deep neural networks”. Phys. Rev. B 108, 054410 (2023).
- “Transformer wave function for the shastry-sutherland model: emergence of a spin-liquid phase” (2024). arXiv:2311.16889.
- “A simple linear algebra identity to optimize large-scale neural network quantum states” (2023). arXiv:2310.05715.
- “Recurrent neural network wave functions”. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023358 (2020).
- “Symmetry-adapted variational quantum eigensolver”. Phys. Rev. A 101, 052340 (2020).
- “Exploiting symmetry in variational quantum machine learning”. PRX Quantum4 (2023).
- “Approximately equivariant quantum neural network for p4m𝑝4𝑚p4mitalic_p 4 italic_m group symmetries in images” (2023). arXiv:2310.02323.
- “Symmetry-invariant quantum machine learning force fields” (2023). arXiv:2311.11362.
- “Variational quantum algorithms”. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 625–644 (2021).
- “Variational monte carlo method combined with quantum-number projection and multi-variable optimization”. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 77, 114701 (2008).
- “Quantum-number projection in the path-integral renormalization group method”. Phys. Rev. B 69, 125110 (2004).
- John Preskill. “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond”. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- “Symmetry breaking in geometric quantum machine learning in the presence of noise” (2024). arXiv:2401.10293.
- “Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017).
- “Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms”. Physical Review A 92, 042303 (2015).
- “Exploring entanglement and optimization within the hamiltonian variational ansatz”. PRX Quantum1 (2020).
- “Avoiding barren plateaus via transferability of smooth solutions in a hamiltonian variational ansatz”. Physical Review A106 (2022).
- “Simulating strongly interacting hubbard chains with the variational hamiltonian ansatz on a quantum computer”. Physical Review Research4 (2022).
- “Avoiding local minima in variational quantum eigensolvers with the natural gradient optimizer”. Physical Review Research2 (2020).
- “Efficient variational simulation of non-trivial quantum states”. SciPost Physics6 (2019).
- “Variational quantum eigensolver ansatz for the J1−J2subscript𝐽1subscript𝐽2{J}_{1}\text{$-$}{J}_{2}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-model”. Phys. Rev. B 106, 144426 (2022).
- “Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations”. Quantum Information and Computation12 (2012).
- “Well-conditioned multi-product formulas for hardware-friendly hamiltonian simulation”. Quantum 7, 1067 (2023).
- Shantanav Chakraborty. “Implementing any linear combination of unitaries on intermediate-term quantum computers” (2023). arXiv:2302.13555.
- “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits”. Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019).
- “The theory of open quantum systems”. Oxford University Press on Demand. (2002).
- “Modeling and simulating the noisy behavior of near-term quantum computers”. Phys. Rev. A 104, 062432 (2021).
- “Noisy gates for simulating quantum computers”. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043210 (2023).
- “Simulating photonic devices with noisy optical elements” (2023). arXiv:2311.10613.
- “Quantum computing and quantum information”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (2000).
- “Principles of quantum computation and information: A comprehensive textbook”. World Scientific. (2019).
- “Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors”. Quantum 4, 321 (2020).
- Mahdi Naghiloo. “Introduction to experimental quantum measurement with superconducting qubits” (2019). arXiv:1904.09291.
- “Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values”. Physical Review A 105, 032620 (2022).
- “Ibm quantum compute resources” (2024).
- “Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization”. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017).
- “Digital zero noise extrapolation for quantum error mitigation”. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). IEEE (2020).
- “Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations” (2022). arXiv:1811.04968.
- Cornelius Lanczos. “An iterative method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators”. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 45, 225–280 (1950).
- “Phenomenological theory of variational quantum ground-state preparation”. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033225 (2023).
- “Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways”. Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
- James McClung. “Constructions and applications of w-states”. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2020).
- “On Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. I”. Journal of Mathematical Physics 10, 1388–1398 (1969).
- Daniel Manzano. “A short introduction to the lindblad master equation”. Aip Advances10 (2020).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.