Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Graph learning methods to extract empathy supporting regions in a naturalistic stimuli fMRI

Published 11 Mar 2024 in q-bio.NC and eess.SP | (2403.07089v1)

Abstract: Functional MRI (fMRI) research, employing naturalistic stimuli like movies, explores brain network interactions in complex cognitive processes such as empathy. The empathy network encompasses multiple brain areas, including the Insula, PFC, ACC, and parietal regions. Our novel processing pipeline applies graph learning methods to whole-brain timeseries signals, incorporating high-pass filtering, voxel-level clustering, and windowed graph learning with a sparsity-based approach. The study involves two short movies shown to 14 healthy volunteers, considering 54 regions extracted from the AAL Atlas. The sparsity-based graph learning consistently outperforms, achieving over 88% accuracy in capturing emotion contagion variations. Temporal analysis reveals a gradual induction of empathy, supported by the method's effectiveness in capturing dynamic connectomes through graph clustering. Edge-weight dynamics analysis underscores sparsity-based learning's superiority, while connectome-network analysis highlights the pivotal role of the Insula, Amygdala, and Thalamus in empathy. Spectral filtering analysis emphasizes the band-pass filter's significance in isolating regions linked to emotional and empathetic processing during empathy HIGH states. Key regions like Amygdala, Insula, and Angular Gyrus consistently activate, supporting their critical role in immediate emotional responses. Strong similarities across movies in graph cluster labels, connectome-network analysis, and spectral filtering-based analyses reveal robust neural correlates of empathy. These findings advance our understanding of empathy-related neural dynamics and identify specific regions in empathetic responses, offering insights for targeted interventions and treatments associated with empathetic processing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. “Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12141, Jul 2016.
  2. “An fmri study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, 2013.
  3. Janelle N. Beadle and Christine E. de la Vega, “Impact of aging on empathy: Review of psychological and neural mechanisms,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 10, 2019.
  4. “Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fmri investigation,” NeuroImage, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 722–734, 2009.
  5. “Empathy and contextual social cognition,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 407–425, Mar 2014.
  6. “Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5661, pp. 1157–1162, 2004.
  7. “The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions,” BioPsychoSocial Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22, Nov 2007.
  8. “The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: A magnetoencephalography study,” NeuroImage, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1833–1840, 2008.
  9. “How Would You Feel versus How Do You Think She Would Feel? A Neuroimaging Study of Perspective-Taking with Social Emotions,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 988–999, 07 2004.
  10. “The neural substrates of social influence on decision making,” PloS one, vol. 8, pp. e52630, 01 2013.
  11. “Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision,” Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 303, pp. 1634–40, 04 2004.
  12. “Evidence of stimulus correlated empathy modes – group ica of fmri data,” Brain and cognition, vol. 94C, pp. 32–43, 01 2015.
  13. “Enactive cinema paves way for understanding complex real-time social interaction in neuroimaging experiments,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 6, 2012.
  14. “An exploratory investigation of functional network connectivity of empathy and default mode networks in a free-viewing task,” Brain connectivity, vol. 5, 04 2015.
  15. “The anatomy of suffering: Understanding the relationship between nociceptive and empathic pain,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 249–259, 2016.
  16. “Inter-subject correlation of brain hemodynamic responses during watching a movie: localization in space and frequency,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 4, 2010.
  17. “Mapping the functional network of medial prefrontal cortex by combining optogenetics and fmri in awake rats,” NeuroImage, vol. 117, pp. 114–123, 2015.
  18. “Estimating encoding models of cortical auditory processing using naturalistic stimuli and transfer learning,” in Real Neurons & Hidden Units: Future directions at the intersection of neuroscience and artificial intelligence @ NeurIPS 2019, 2019.
  19. “Graph signal processing: Overview, challenges, and applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 808–828, 2018.
  20. “Graph frequency analysis of brain signals,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1189–1203, 2016.
  21. “A graph signal processing perspective on functional brain imaging,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. PP, pp. 1–18, 03 2018.
  22. “Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations,” NeuroImage, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1059–1069, 2010, Computational Models of the Brain.
  23. “Smooth graph learning for functional connectivity estimation,” NeuroImage, vol. 239, pp. 118289, 2021.
  24. “Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fmri,” NeuroImage, vol. 156, pp. 1–13, 2017.
  25. “Robust graph learning for classification,” Signal Processing, vol. 211, pp. 109120, 2023.
  26. “Identifying sparse connectivity patterns in the brain using resting-state fmri,” NeuroImage, vol. 105, pp. 286–299, 2015.
  27. “Learning task-aware effective brain connectivity for fmri analysis with graph neural networks (extended abstract),” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2022, pp. 4995–4996.
  28. “Metric learning with spectral graph convolutions on brain connectivity networks,” NeuroImage, vol. 169, pp. 431–442, 2018.
  29. Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  30. “The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity mri,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 431–438, 2012, Neuroergonomics: The human brain in action and at work.
  31. “Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity mri networks arise from subject motion,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2142–2154, 2012.
  32. “Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fmri data for network node identification,” NeuroImage, vol. 82, pp. 403–415, 2013.
  33. Introduction to Graph Signal Processing, pp. 3–108, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019.
  34. Robert Tibshirani, “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, vol. 58, pp. 267–288, 1996.
  35. “Learning laplacian matrix in smooth graph signal representations,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 64, no. 23, pp. 6160–6173, 2016.
  36. “Human brain networks in health and disease,” Current opinion in neurology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 340—347, August 2009.
  37. “Disrupted brain connectivity networks in drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 334–342, 2011, Neural Connectivity, Ruminations, and Suicide.
  38. “Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain,” NeuroImage, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 2492–2502, 2011.
  39. “Emotion regulation of hippocampus using real-time fMRI neurofeedback in healthy human,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 13, pp. 242, July 2019.
  40. “The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 811–830, Jan. 2008.
  41. “Volitional control of anterior insula activity modulates the response to aversive stimuli. a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging study,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 425–432, Sept. 2010.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.