Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Unexpected Quantum Indeterminacy (2403.06584v1)

Published 11 Mar 2024 in physics.hist-ph and quant-ph

Abstract: Recent philosophical discussions about metaphysical indeterminacy have been substantiated with the idea that quantum mechanics, one of the most successful physical theories in the history of science, provides explicit instances of worldly indefiniteness. Against this background, several philosophers underline that there are alternative formulations of quantum theory in which such indeterminacy has no room and plays no role. A typical example is Bohmian mechanics in virtue of its clear particle ontology. Contrary to these latter claims, this paper aims at showing that different pilot-wave theories do in fact instantiate diverse forms of metaphysical indeterminacy. Namely, I argue that there are various questions about worldly states of affairs that cannot be determined by looking exclusively at their ontologies and dynamical laws. Moreover, it will be claimed that Bohmian mechanics generates a new form of modal indeterminacy. Finally, it will be concluded that ontological clarity and indeterminacy are not mutually exclusive, i.e., the two can coexist in the same theory.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Allori, V. (2013). Primitive ontology and the structure of fundamental physical theories. In Albert, D. Z. and Ney, A., editors, The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, chapter 2, pages 58 – 75. Oxford University Press.
  2. Bell, J. S. (1975). The theory of local beables. TH 2053-CERN.
  3. Bohm, D. (1952a). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I. Physical Review, 85(2):166 –179.
  4. Bohm, D. (1952b). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. II. Physical Review, 85(2):180–193.
  5. Bokulich, A. (2014). Metaphysical indeterminacy, properties, and quantum theory. Res Philosophica, 91(3):449–475.
  6. Calosi, C. (2022). Quantum Modal Indeterminacy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 95:177–184.
  7. Quantum relational indeterminacy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 71:158–169.
  8. Quantum Indeterminacy. Philosophy Compass, pages 1–15.
  9. Quantum metaphysical indeerminacy. Philosophical Studies, 176:1–29.
  10. Metaphysical Indeterminacy in the Multiverse. In Allori, V., editor, Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality. Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy, pages 375–395. Springer, Synthese Library.
  11. Chen, E. (2022). Fundamental Nomic Vagueness. Philosophical Review, 131(1):1–49.
  12. Dirac, P. A. M. (1947). The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd edition.
  13. Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. Physical Review Letters, 93:090402.
  14. Quantum equilibrium and the role of operators as observables in quantum theory. Journal of Statistical Physics, 116:959 – 1055.
  15. Quantum physics without quantum philosophy. Berlin: Springer.
  16. A minimalist ontology of the natural world. New York: Routledge.
  17. Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Glick, D. (2017). Against quantum indeterminacy. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 6(3):204–213.
  19. The Quantum Formalism and the GRW Formalism. Journal of Statistical Physics, 149(1):142–201.
  20. Mariani, C. (2022). Does the Primitive Ontology of GRW Rest on Shaky Ground? In Allori, V., editor, Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality. Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy, pages 127–139. Springer, Synthese Library.
  21. Nikolić, H. (2010). QFT as pilot-wave theory of particle creation and destruction. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 25(7):1477 – 1505.
  22. Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(48):807–812.
  23. Skow, B. (2010). Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy. The Philosophical Quarterly, 60(241):851–858.
  24. Torza, A. (2023). Indeterminacy in the world. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Vassallo, A. (2015). Can Bohmian Mechanics be made background independent? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52:242–250.
  26. Relationalism about mechanics based on a minimalist ontology of matter. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 7:299–318.
Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)