Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Strategy to measure tau $g-2$ via photon fusion in LHC proton collisions

Published 10 Mar 2024 in hep-ph | (2403.06336v2)

Abstract: Measuring the tau-lepton ($\tau$) anomalous magnetic moment $a_\tau = (g_\tau -2)/2$ in photon fusion production ($\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$) tests foundational Standard Model principles. However, $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ eludes observation in LHC proton collisions (pp) despite enhanced new physics sensitivity from higher-mass reach than existing probes. We propose a novel strategy to measure $\text{pp} \to \text{p}(\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau)\text{p}$ by introducing the overlooked electron-muon signature with vertex isolation for signal extraction. Applying the effective field theory of dipole moments, we estimate 95% CL sensitivity of $-0.0092 < a_\tau < 0.011$ assuming 300 fb${-1}$ luminosity and 5% systematics. This fourfold improvement beyond existing constraints opens a crucial path to unveiling new physics imprinted in tau-lepton dipoles.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (161)
  1. J. S. Schwinger, “On Quantum-Electrodynamics and the Magnetic Moment of the Electron,” Phys. Rev. 73, 416–417 (1948).
  2. P. Kusch and H. M. Foley, “The Magnetic Moment of the Electron,” Phys. Rev. 74, 250 (1948).
  3. B. Odom, D. Hanneke, B. D’Urso,  and G. Gabrielse, “New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Using a One-Electron Quantum Cyclotron,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 030801 (2006).
  4. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell Hoogerheide,  and G. Gabrielse, “Cavity Control of a Single-Electron Quantum Cyclotron: Measuring the Electron Magnetic Moment,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 052122 (2011), arXiv:1009.4831 [physics.atom-ph] .
  5. R. Bouchendira, P. Cladé, S. Guellati-Khélifa, F. Nez,  and F. Biraben, “New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant and Test of the Quantum Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 080801 (2011).
  6. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita,  and M. Nio, “Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Electron g-2 and an Improved Value of the Fine Structure Constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111807 (2012a), arXiv:1205.5368 [hep-ph] .
  7. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey,  and H. Müller, “Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model,” Science 360, 191–195 (2018).
  8. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita,  and M. Nio, “Complete Tenth-Order QED Contribution to the Muon g-2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111808 (2012b), arXiv:1205.5370 [hep-ph] .
  9. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura,  and T. Teubner, “Muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 and α⁢(MZ2)𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑍2\alpha(M_{Z}^{2})italic_α ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ): a new data-based analysis,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 114025 (2018), arXiv:1802.02995 [hep-ph] .
  10. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu,  and Z. Zhang, “A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to 𝜶⁢(𝐦𝐙𝟐)𝜶superscriptsubscript𝐦𝐙2\mathbf{\bm{\alpha}(m_{Z}^{2})}bold_italic_α ( bold_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ),” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020), arXiv:1908.00921 [hep-ph] .
  11. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé,  and S. Guellati-Khélifa, “Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion,” Nature 588, 61–65 (2020).
  12. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra,  and G. Gabrielse, “Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023), arXiv:2209.13084 [physics.atom-ph] .
  13. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2), “Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602035 [hep-ex] .
  14. B. Abi et al. (Muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2), “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021), arXiv:2104.03281 [hep-ex] .
  15. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2), “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023), arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex] .
  16. T. Aoyama et al., “The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rept. 887, 1–166 (2020), arXiv:2006.04822 [hep-ph] .
  17. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  18. ALEPH Collaboration, “Updated measurement of the tau lepton lifetime,” Phys. Lett. B 414, 362–372 (1997), arXiv:hep-ex/9710026 .
  19. DELPHI Collaboration, “A Precise measurement of the tau lifetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 283–296 (2004a), arXiv:hep-ex/0410010 .
  20. L3 Collaboration, “Measurement of the lifetime of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton,” Phys. Lett. B 479, 67–78 (2000), arXiv:hep-ex/0003023 .
  21. Belle Collaboration, “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton lifetime at Belle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 031801 (2014), arXiv:1310.8503 [hep-ex] .
  22. DELPHI Collaboration, “Study of tau-pair production in photon-photon collisions at LEP and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of the tau lepton,” Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 159–170 (2004b), arXiv:hep-ex/0406010 [hep-ex] .
  23. L3 Collaboration, “Measurement of the anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments of the tau lepton,” Phys. Lett. B 434, 169–179 (1998).
  24. OPAL Collaboration, “An Upper limit on the anomalous magnetic moment of the tau lepton,” Phys. Lett. B 431, 188–198 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9803020 [hep-ex] .
  25. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Observation of the γ⁢γ→τ⁢τ→𝛾𝛾𝜏𝜏\gamma\gamma\rightarrow\tau\tauitalic_γ italic_γ → italic_τ italic_τ Process in Pb+PbPbPb\mathrm{Pb}+\mathrm{Pb}roman_Pb + roman_Pb Collisions and Constraints on the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-Lepton Anomalous Magnetic Moment with the ATLAS Detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151802 (2023a), arXiv:2204.13478 [hep-ex] .
  26. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ Lepton Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sN⁢N=5.02⁢  ⁢TeVsubscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02  TeV\sqrt{{s}_{NN}}=5.02\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 roman_TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151803 (2023), arXiv:2206.05192 [nucl-ex] .
  27. S. Eidelman and M. Passera, “Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 159–179 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701260 [hep-ph] .
  28. T. Fukuyama, A. Ilakovac,  and T. Kikuchi, “Lepton flavor violating leptonic/semileptonic decays of charged leptons in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 125–146 (2008), arXiv:hep-ph/0506295 [hep-ph] .
  29. B. Dutta and Y. Mimura, “Electron g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 with flavor violation in MSSM,” Phys. Lett. B 790, 563–567 (2019), arXiv:1811.10209 [hep-ph] .
  30. H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, “Tale of two anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 075011 (2018), arXiv:1806.10252 [hep-ph] .
  31. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel,  and A. Thamm, “Axionlike Particles, Lepton-Flavor Violation, and a New Explanation of aμsubscript𝑎𝜇a_{\mu}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and aesubscript𝑎𝑒a_{e}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 211803 (2020), arXiv:1908.00008 [hep-ph] .
  32. M. Endo and W. Yin, “Explaining electron and muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 anomaly in SUSY without lepton-flavor mixings,” JHEP 08, 122 (2019), arXiv:1906.08768 [hep-ph] .
  33. LHCb Collaboration, “Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions ℬ⁢(B¯0→D*+⁢τ−⁢ν¯τ)/ℬ⁢(B¯0→D*+⁢μ−⁢ν¯μ)ℬ→superscript¯𝐵0superscript𝐷absentsuperscript𝜏subscript¯𝜈𝜏ℬ→superscript¯𝐵0superscript𝐷absentsuperscript𝜇subscript¯𝜈𝜇\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}^{0}\to D^{*+}\tau^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\tau})/\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}% ^{0}\to D^{*+}\mu^{-}\bar{\nu}_{\mu})caligraphic_B ( over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / caligraphic_B ( over¯ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 159901], arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex] .
  34. LHCb Collaboration, “Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions ℛ⁢(D*)ℛsuperscript𝐷\mathcal{R}(D^{*})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and ℛ⁢(D0)ℛsuperscript𝐷0\mathcal{R}(D^{0})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111802 (2023), arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex] .
  35. Belle Collaboration, “Measurement of ℛ⁢(D)ℛ𝐷\mathcal{R}(D)caligraphic_R ( italic_D ) and ℛ⁢(D∗)ℛsuperscript𝐷∗\mathcal{R}(D^{\ast})caligraphic_R ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) with a semileptonic tagging method,”   (2019), arXiv:1904.08794 [hep-ex] .
  36. B. Allanach, F. S. Queiroz, A. Strumia,  and S. Sun, “Z′superscript𝑍′Z^{\prime}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models for the LHCb and g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 muon anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 055045 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 119902], arXiv:1511.07447 [hep-ph] .
  37. S. Di Chiara, A. Fowlie, S. Fraser, C. Marzo, L. Marzola, M. Raidal,  and C. Spethmann, “Minimal flavor-changing Z′superscript𝑍′Z^{\prime}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models and muon g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 after the RK*subscript𝑅superscript𝐾R_{K^{*}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT measurement,” Nucl. Phys. B 923, 245–257 (2017), arXiv:1704.06200 [hep-ph] .
  38. A. Biswas and A. Shaw, “Reconciling dark matter, RK(*)subscript𝑅superscript𝐾R_{K^{(*)}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( * ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT anomalies and (g−2)μsubscript𝑔2𝜇(g-2)_{\mu}( italic_g - 2 ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in an Lμ−Lτsubscript𝐿𝜇subscript𝐿𝜏{L_{\mu}-L_{\tau}}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT scenario,” JHEP 05, 165 (2019), arXiv:1903.08745 [hep-ph] .
  39. W. Yin and N. Yokozaki, “Splitting mass spectra and muon g - 2 in Higgs-anomaly mediation,” Phys. Lett. B 762, 72–79 (2016), arXiv:1607.05705 [hep-ph] .
  40. M. Yamaguchi and W. Yin, “A novel approach to finely tuned supersymmetric standard models: The case of the non-universal Higgs mass model,” PTEP 2018, 023B06 (2018), arXiv:1606.04953 [hep-ph] .
  41. K. S. Babu, T. Fukuyama, S. Khan,  and S. Saad, “Peccei-Quinn Symmetry and Nucleon Decay in Renormalizable SUSY S⁢O𝑆𝑂SOitalic_S italic_O(10),” JHEP 06, 045 (2019), arXiv:1812.11695 [hep-ph] .
  42. S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, “Electric Dipole Moments as Probes of B𝐵Bitalic_B Anomaly,”   (2023), arXiv:2307.11751 [hep-ph] .
  43. B. Allanach and J. Davighi, “The Rumble in the Meson: a leptoquark versus a Z’ to fit b → sμ𝜇\muitalic_μ+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTμ𝜇\muitalic_μ−{}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT anomalies including 2022 LHCb RK(∗)subscript𝑅superscript𝐾∗{R}_{K^{\left(\ast\right)}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∗ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT measurements,” JHEP 04, 033 (2023), arXiv:2211.11766 [hep-ph] .
  44. B. Allanach and A. Mullin, “Plan B: New Z′superscript𝑍′{Z^{\prime}}italic_Z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT models for b→s⁢l+⁢l−→𝑏𝑠superscript𝑙superscript𝑙b\rightarrow sl^{+}l^{-}italic_b → italic_s italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT anomalies,” JHEP 09, 173 (2023), arXiv:2306.08669 [hep-ph] .
  45. T. Moroi, “The Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 53, 6565–6575 (1996), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 56, 4424 (1997)], arXiv:hep-ph/9512396 .
  46. T. Ibrahim and P. Nath, “CP violation and the muon anomaly in N=1 supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 095008 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9907555 .
  47. S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells, “Muon Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment in Supersymmetric Theories,” Phys. Rev. D 64, 035003 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0103067 [hep-ph] .
  48. F. del Aguila, F. Cornet,  and J. I. Illana, “The possibility of using a large heavy-ion collider for measuring the electromagnetic properties of the tau lepton,” Phys. Lett. B 271, 256–260 (1991).
  49. L. Beresford and J. Liu, “New physics and tau g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 using LHC heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 113008 (2020), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 039902], arXiv:1908.05180 [hep-ph] .
  50. M. Dyndal, M. Klusek-Gawenda, M. Schott,  and A. Szczurek, “Anomalous electromagnetic moments of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton in γ⁢γ→τ+⁢τ−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝜏superscript𝜏\gamma\gamma\to\tau^{+}\tau^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT reaction in Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 809, 135682 (2020), arXiv:2002.05503 [hep-ph] .
  51. N. Burmasov, E. Kryshen, P. Bühler,  and R. Lavicka, “Feasibility Studies of Tau-Lepton Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurements in Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Part. Nucl. 54, 590–594 (2023).
  52. V. P. Goncalves, D. E. Martins,  and M. S. Rangel, “Exclusive dilepton production at forward rapidities in P⁢b⁢P⁢b𝑃𝑏𝑃𝑏PbPbitalic_P italic_b italic_P italic_b collisions,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 220 (2021), arXiv:2012.08923 [hep-ph] .
  53. M. Verducci, N. Vignaroli, C. Roda,  and V. Cavasinni, “A study of the measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton anomalous magnetic moment in high energy lead-lead collisions at LHC,”   (2023), arXiv:2307.15160 [hep-ph] .
  54. K. Piotrzkowski, “Tagging two photon production at the CERN LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 071502 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0009065 [hep-ex] .
  55. A. J. Baltz, “The Physics of Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Rept. 458, 1–171 (2008), arXiv:0706.3356 [nucl-ex] .
  56. M. G. Albrow et al. (FP420 R & D), “The FP420 R & D Project: Higgs and New Physics with forward protons at the LHC,” JINST 4, T10001 (2009), arXiv:0806.0302 [hep-ex] .
  57. J. de Favereau de Jeneret, V. Lemaitre, Y. Liu, S. Ovyn, T. Pierzchala, K. Piotrzkowski, X. Rouby, N. Schul,  and M. Vander Donckt, “High energy photon interactions at the LHC,”  (2009), arXiv:0908.2020 [hep-ph] .
  58. D. d’Enterria and J.-P. Lansberg, ‘‘Study of Higgs boson production and its b⁢b¯𝑏¯𝑏b\overline{b}italic_b over¯ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG decay in γ−γ𝛾𝛾\gamma\mathrm{\text{$-$}}\gammaitalic_γ - italic_γ processes in proton-nucleus collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 014004 (2010), arXiv:0909.3047 [hep-ph] .
  59. ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of exclusive γ⁢γ→ℓ+⁢ℓ−→𝛾𝛾superscriptℓsuperscriptℓ\gamma\gamma\rightarrow\ell^{+}\ell^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production in proton-proton collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B 749, 242–261 (2015a), arXiv:1506.07098 [hep-ex] .
  60. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Measurement of the exclusive γ⁢γ→μ+⁢μ−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝜇superscript𝜇\gamma\gamma\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT process in proton-proton collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B 777, 303–323 (2018a), arXiv:1708.04053 [hep-ex] .
  61. ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of exclusive γ⁢γ→W+⁢W−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝑊superscript𝑊\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production and search for exclusive Higgs boson production in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV using the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 032011 (2016a), arXiv:1607.03745 [hep-ex] .
  62. CMS Collaboration, “Search for exclusive or semi-exclusive photon pair production and observation of exclusive and semi-exclusive electron pair production in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 TeV,” JHEP 11, 080 (2012), arXiv:1209.1666 [hep-ex] .
  63. CMS Collaboration, “Study of Exclusive Two-Photon Production of W+⁢W−superscript𝑊superscript𝑊W^{+}W^{-}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p Collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 TeV and Constraints on Anomalous Quartic Gauge Couplings,” JHEP 07, 116 (2013), arXiv:1305.5596 [hep-ex] .
  64. CMS Collaboration, “Evidence for exclusive γ⁢γ→W+⁢W−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝑊superscript𝑊\gamma\gamma\to W^{+}W^{-}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 and 8 TeV,” JHEP 08, 119 (2016), arXiv:1604.04464 [hep-ex] .
  65. ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of light-by-light scattering and search for axion-like particles with 2.2 nb−11{}^{-1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT of Pb+Pb data with the ATLAS detector,” JHEP 03, 243 (2021a), [Erratum: JHEP 11 (2021) 050], arXiv:2008.05355 [hep-ex] .
  66. ATLAS Collaboration, “Exclusive dimuon production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠NN5.02\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with ATLAS,” Phys. Rev. C 104, 024906 (2021b), arXiv:2011.12211 [nucl-ex] .
  67. ATLAS Collaboration, “Exclusive dielectron production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNNsubscript𝑠NN\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with ATLAS,” JHEP 06, 182 (2023b), arXiv:2207.12781 [nucl-ex] .
  68. D. d’Enterria and G. G. da Silveira, “Observing light-by-light scattering at the Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080405 (2013), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 129901], arXiv:1305.7142 [hep-ph] .
  69. ATLAS Collaboration, “Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Nat. Phys. 13, 852–858 (2017), arXiv:1702.01625 [hep-ex] .
  70. CMS Collaboration, “Evidence for light-by-light scattering and searches for axion-like particles in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at sNN=subscript𝑠NNabsent\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 797, 134826 (2019a), arXiv:1810.04602 [hep-ex] .
  71. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 052001 (2019a), arXiv:1904.03536 [hep-ex] .
  72. J. Howarth, “Elastic Potential: A proposal to discover elastic production of top quarks at the Large Hadron Collider,”   (2020), arXiv:2008.04249 [hep-ph] .
  73. V. P. Gonçalves, D. E. Martins, M. S. Rangel,  and M. Tasevsky, “Top quark pair production in the exclusive processes at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 074014 (2020), arXiv:2007.04565 [hep-ph] .
  74. E. Chapon, C. Royon,  and O. Kepka, “Anomalous quartic W⁢W⁢γ⁢γ𝑊𝑊𝛾𝛾WW\gamma\gammaitalic_W italic_W italic_γ italic_γ, Z⁢Z⁢γ⁢γ𝑍𝑍𝛾𝛾ZZ\gamma\gammaitalic_Z italic_Z italic_γ italic_γ, and trilinear W⁢W⁢γ𝑊𝑊𝛾WW\gammaitalic_W italic_W italic_γ couplings in two-photon processes at high luminosity at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 074003 (2010), arXiv:0912.5161 [hep-ph] .
  75. S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff, O. Kepka, B. Lenzi, C. Royon,  and M. Saimpert, “Probing new physics in diphoton production with proton tagging at the Large Hadron Collider,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 114004 (2014), arXiv:1312.5153 [hep-ph] .
  76. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos,  and T. You, “Light-by-Light Scattering Constraint on Born-Infeld Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 261802 (2017), arXiv:1703.08450 [hep-ph] .
  77. S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou,  and T. Melia, “Searching for Axionlike Particles with Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 171801 (2017), arXiv:1607.06083 [hep-ph] .
  78. C. Baldenegro, S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff,  and C. Royon, “Searching for axion-like particles with proton tagging at the LHC,” JHEP 06, 131 (2018), arXiv:1803.10835 [hep-ph] .
  79. J. Ohnemus, T. F. Walsh,  and P. M. Zerwas, “γ⁢γ𝛾𝛾\gamma\gammaitalic_γ italic_γ production of nonstrongly interacting SUSY particles at hadron colliders,” Phys. Lett. B 328, 369–373 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9402302 [hep-ph] .
  80. N. Schul and K. Piotrzkowski, “Detection of two-photon exclusive production of supersymmetric pairs at the LHC,” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 179-180, 289–297 (2008), arXiv:0806.1097 [hep-ph] .
  81. L. A. Harland-Lang, C. H. Kom, K. Sakurai,  and W. J. Stirling, “Measuring the masses of a pair of semi-invisibly decaying particles in central exclusive production with forward proton tagging,” Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1969 (2012), arXiv:1110.4320 [hep-ph] .
  82. L. Beresford and J. Liu, “Search Strategy for Sleptons and Dark Matter Using the LHC as a Photon Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 141801 (2019), arXiv:1811.06465 [hep-ph] .
  83. L. A. Harland-Lang, V. A. Khoze, M. G. Ryskin,  and M. Tasevsky, “LHC Searches for Dark Matter in Compressed Mass Scenarios: Challenges in the Forward Proton Mode,” JHEP 04, 010 (2019a), arXiv:1812.04886 [hep-ph] .
  84. R. Bruce et al., “New physics searches with heavy-ion collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” J. Phys. G 47, 060501 (2020), arXiv:1812.07688 [hep-ph] .
  85. D. d’Enterria, M. A. Tamlihat, L. Schoeffel, H.-S. Shao,  and Y. Tayalati, “Collider constraints on massive gravitons coupling to photons,” Phys. Lett. B 846, 138237 (2023), arXiv:2306.15558 [hep-ph] .
  86. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for an axion-like particle with forward proton scattering in association with photon pairs at ATLAS,” JHEP 07, 234 (2023c), arXiv:2304.10953 [hep-ex] .
  87. CMS and TOTEM Collaborations, “First Search for Exclusive Diphoton Production at High Mass with Tagged Protons in Proton-Proton Collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 011801 (2022), arXiv:2110.05916 [hep-ex] .
  88. CMS and TOTEM Collaborations, “Search for high-mass exclusive γ⁢γ𝛾𝛾\gamma\gammaitalic_γ italic_γ→→\to→ WW and γ⁢γ𝛾𝛾\gamma\gammaitalic_γ italic_γ→→\to→ ZZ production in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” JHEP 07, 229 (2023), arXiv:2211.16320 [hep-ex] .
  89. S. Atag and A. A. Billur, “Possibility of Determining τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ Lepton Electromagnetic Moments in γ⁢γ→τ+⁢τ−→𝛾𝛾superscript𝜏superscript𝜏{\gamma\gamma\to\tau^{+}\tau^{-}}italic_γ italic_γ → italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Process at the CERN-LHC,” JHEP 11, 060 (2010), arXiv:1005.2841 [hep-ph] .
  90. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation and Measurement of Forward Proton Scattering in Association with Lepton Pairs Produced via the Photon Fusion Mechanism at ATLAS,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261801 (2020a), arXiv:2009.14537 [hep-ex] .
  91. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of photon-induced W+⁢W−superscript𝑊superscript𝑊W^{+}W^{-}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT production in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B 816, 136190 (2021c), arXiv:2010.04019 [hep-ex] .
  92. ATLAS Collaboration, “Sensitivity to exclusive W⁢W𝑊𝑊WWitalic_W italic_W production in photon scattering at the High Luminosity LHC,” ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-026  (2021d).
  93. M. A. Samuel and G. Li, “How to measure the magnetic moment of the tau lepton,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 33, 1471–1477 (1994).
  94. A. Hayreter and G. Valencia, “Constraining τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton dipole moments and gluon couplings at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 013015 (2013), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 099902], arXiv:1305.6833 [hep-ph] .
  95. I. Galon, A. Rajaraman,  and T. M. P. Tait, “H→τ+⁢τ−⁢γ→𝐻superscript𝜏superscript𝜏𝛾H\rightarrow\tau^{+}\tau^{-}\gammaitalic_H → italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ as a probe of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ magnetic dipole moment,” JHEP 12, 111 (2016), arXiv:1610.01601 [hep-ph] .
  96. A. S. Fomin, A. Yu Korchin, A. Stocchi, S. Barsuk,  and P. Robbe, “Feasibility of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ -lepton electromagnetic dipole moments measurement using bent crystal at the LHC,” JHEP 03, 156 (2019), arXiv:1810.06699 [hep-ph] .
  97. J. Fu, M. A. Giorgi, L. Henry, D. Marangotto, F. Martínez Vidal, A. Merli, N. Neri,  and J. Ruiz Vidal, “Novel Method for the Direct Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ Lepton Dipole Moments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 011801 (2019), arXiv:1901.04003 [hep-ex] .
  98. U. Haisch, L. Schnell,  and J. Weiss, “LHC tau-pair production constraints on aτsubscript𝑎𝜏a_{\tau}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and dτsubscript𝑑𝜏d_{\tau}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,” SciPost Phys. 16, 048 (2024), arXiv:2307.14133 [hep-ph] .
  99. S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli,  and M. Passera, “τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ dipole moments via radiative leptonic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ decays,” JHEP 03, 140 (2016), arXiv:1601.07987 [hep-ph] .
  100. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter,  and J. M. Roney, “Toward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 093007 (2022), arXiv:2111.10378 [hep-ph] .
  101. M. Koksal, A. A. Billur, A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez,  and M. A. Hernández-Ruíz, “Model-independent sensitivity estimates for the electromagnetic dipole moments of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton at the CLIC,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 015017 (2018), arXiv:1804.02373 [hep-ph] .
  102. A. A. Billur and M. Köksal, “Probe of the electromagnetic moments of the tau lepton in gamma-gamma collisions at the CLIC,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 037301 (2014).
  103. A. Rajaraman, J. N. Howard, R. Riley,  and Tim M. P. Tait, “The τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ Magnetic Dipole Moment at Future Lepton Colliders,” LHEP 2, 5 (2019), arXiv:1810.09570 [hep-ph] .
  104. M. Köksal, “Search for the electromagnetic moments of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton in photon–photon collisions at the LHeC and the FCC-he,” J. Phys. G 46, 065003 (2019), arXiv:1809.01963 [hep-ph] .
  105. A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M. Köksal, A. A. Billur,  and M. A. Hernández-Ruíz, “Feasibility at the LHC, FCC-he and CLIC for sensitivity estimates on anomalous τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton couplings,”   (2019), arXiv:1903.04135 [hep-ph] .
  106. J. J. Chwastowski, K. Piotrzkowski,  and M. Przybycien, “Exclusive lepton pair production at the electron–ion collider,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 846 (2022), arXiv:2206.02466 [hep-ph] .
  107. M. Fael, L. Mercolli,  and M. Passera, “Towards a determination of the tau lepton dipole moments,” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 253-255, 103–106 (2014), arXiv:1301.5302 [hep-ph] .
  108. M. Köksal, “Model-independent study on the anomalous τ⁢τ¯⁢γ𝜏¯𝜏𝛾\tau\bar{\tau}\gammaitalic_τ over¯ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG italic_γ couplings at the ILC,” Nucl. Phys. B 971, 115520 (2021), arXiv:2104.01003 [hep-ph] .
  109. X. Chen and Y. Wu, “Search for the Electric Dipole Moment and anomalous magnetic moment of the tau lepton at tau factories,” JHEP 10, 089 (2019), arXiv:1803.00501 [hep-ph] .
  110. H. M. Tran and Y. Kurihara, “Tau g−2𝑔2g-2italic_g - 2 at e−⁢e+superscript𝑒superscript𝑒e^{-}e^{+}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT colliders with momentum dependent form factor,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 108 (2021), arXiv:2006.00660 [hep-ph] .
  111. M. Köksal, A. A. Billur, A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez,  and M. A. Hernández-Ruíz, “The μ+⁢μ−superscript𝜇superscript𝜇\mu^{+}\mu^{-}italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collider to sensitivity estimates on the magnetic and electric dipole moments of the tau-lepton,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950076 (2019), arXiv:1811.01188 [hep-ph] .
  112. S. Qian et al., “Boosted Tau Lepton as a Microscope and Macroscope,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2022, 4931241 (2022), arXiv:2201.07808 [hep-ph] .
  113. ALEPH Collaboration, “Measurement of the tau polarization at LEP,” Eur. Phys. J. C 20, 401–430 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0104038 .
  114. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Measurement of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ polarisation in Z/γ*→τ⁢τ→𝑍superscript𝛾𝜏𝜏Z/\gamma^{*}\rightarrow\tau\tauitalic_Z / italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT * end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_τ italic_τ decays in proton–proton collisions at s=8𝑠8\sqrt{s}=8square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 163 (2018b), arXiv:1709.03490 [hep-ex] .
  115. CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton polarization in Z boson decays in proton-proton collisions at s𝑠\sqrt{s}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” JHEP 01, 101 (2024), arXiv:2309.12408 [hep-ex] .
  116. ATLAS Collaboration, “Test of the universality of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ and μ𝜇\muitalic_μ lepton couplings in W𝑊Witalic_W-boson decays with the ATLAS detector,” Nature Phys. 17, 813–818 (2021e), arXiv:2007.14040 [hep-ex] .
  117. BaBar Collaboration, “Measurements of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ mass and the mass difference of the τ+superscript𝜏{\tau}^{+}italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and τ−superscript𝜏{\tau}^{-}italic_τ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at BABAR,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 092005 (2009), arXiv:0909.3562 [hep-ex] .
  118. BESIII Collaboration, “Precision measurement of the mass of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ lepton,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 012001 (2014), arXiv:1405.1076 [hep-ex] .
  119. Belle-II Collaboration, “Measurement of the τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-lepton mass with the Belle II experiment,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 032006 (2023), arXiv:2305.19116 [hep-ex] .
  120. D. Alves et al. (LHC New Physics Working Group), “Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches,” J. Phys. G 39, 105005 (2012), arXiv:1105.2838 [hep-ph] .
  121. J. Abdallah et al., “Simplified Models for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC,” Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10, 8–23 (2015), arXiv:1506.03116 [hep-ph] .
  122. A. Barr and J. Liu, “Analysing parameter space correlations of recent 13 TeV gluino and squark searches in the pMSSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 202 (2017), arXiv:1608.05379 [hep-ph] .
  123. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Search for new phenomena in dijet mass and angular distributions from p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B 754, 302–322 (2016b), arXiv:1512.01530 [hep-ex] .
  124. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for low-mass resonances decaying into two jets and produced in association with a photon using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Lett. B 795, 56–75 (2019b), arXiv:1901.10917 [hep-ex] .
  125. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 052005 (2020b), arXiv:1911.12606 [hep-ex] .
  126. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for direct stau production in events with two hadronic τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ-leptons in s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 032009 (2020c), arXiv:1911.06660 [hep-ex] .
  127. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051801 (2020d), arXiv:2002.12223 [hep-ex] .
  128. CMS Collaboration, “Search for supersymmetric partners of electrons and muons in proton-proton collisions at s=𝑠absent\sqrt{s}=square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 790, 140–166 (2019b), arXiv:1806.05264 [hep-ex] .
  129. CMS Collaboration, “Search for Supersymmetry with a Compressed Mass Spectrum in Events with a Soft τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ Lepton, a Highly Energetic Jet, and Large Missing Transverse Momentum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041803 (2020), arXiv:1910.01185 [hep-ex] .
  130. CMS Collaboration, “Search for invisible decays of the Higgs boson produced via vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 092007 (2022), arXiv:2201.11585 [hep-ex] .
  131. LHCb Collaboration, “Search for A′→μ+⁢μ−→superscript𝐴′superscript𝜇superscript𝜇A^{\prime}\to\mu^{+}\mu^{-}italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041801 (2020), arXiv:1910.06926 [hep-ex] .
  132. R. Escribano and E. Masso, “New bounds on the magnetic and electric moments of the tau lepton,” Phys. Lett. B 301, 419–422 (1993).
  133. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak,  and J. Rosiek, “Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,” JHEP 10, 085 (2010), arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph] .
  134. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr,  and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 – A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250–2300 (2014), arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph] .
  135. I. Brivio, Y. Jiang,  and M. Trott, “The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools,” JHEP 12, 070 (2017), arXiv:1709.06492 [hep-ph] .
  136. I. Brivio, “SMEFTsim 3.0 — a practical guide,” JHEP 04, 073 (2021), arXiv:2012.11343 [hep-ph] .
  137. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer,  and T. Stelzer, “MadGraph 5: Going Beyond,” JHEP 06, 128 (2011), arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph] .
  138. J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,” JHEP 07, 079 (2014), arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph] .
  139. H.-S. Shao and D. d’Enterria, “gamma-UPC: automated generation of exclusive photon-photon processes in ultraperipheral proton and nuclear collisions with varying form factors,” JHEP 09, 248 (2022), arXiv:2207.03012 [hep-ph] .
  140. C. Bierlich et al., “A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3,” SciPost Phys. Codebases 8 (2022), 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph] .
  141. “IPPP Workshop on the modeling of photon-induced processes,”  (2023), https://conference.ippp.dur.ac.uk/event/1193/.
  142. R. D. Ball et al., “Parton distributions with LHC data,” Nucl. Phys. B 867, 244–289 (2013), arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph] .
  143. M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini,  and M. Treccani, “Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions,” JHEP 01, 013 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0611129 [hep-ph] .
  144. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens,  and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,” JHEP 02, 057 (2014), arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex] .
  145. ATLAS Collaboration, “ATLAS Phase-II Upgrade Scoping Document,”   (2015b), 10.17181/CERN.7CRX.AJHP.
  146. ATLAS Collaboration, “Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 47 (2020e), arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex] .
  147. ATLAS Collaboration, “Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2,” JINST 15, P09015 (2020f), arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det] .
  148. ATLAS Collaboration, “Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 topological trigger in Run 2,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 7 (2022a), arXiv:2105.01416 [hep-ex] .
  149. ATLAS Collaboration, “Trigger menu in 2018,” ATL-DAQ-PUB-2019-001  (2019c).
  150. ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of distributions sensitive to the underlying event in inclusive Z𝑍Zitalic_Z-boson production in pp collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 666 (2019d), arXiv:1905.09752 [hep-ex] .
  151. L. A. Harland-Lang, M. Tasevsky, V. A. Khoze,  and M. G. Ryskin, “A new approach to modelling elastic and inelastic photon-initiated production at the LHC: SuperChic 4,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 925 (2020), arXiv:2007.12704 [hep-ph] .
  152. ATLAS Collaboration, ‘‘Charged-particle distributions at low transverse momentum in s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p interactions measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 502 (2016c), arXiv:1606.01133 [hep-ex] .
  153. W. P. McCormack et al. (ATLAS), “CTD2020: Minimum Pt Track Reconstruction in ATLAS,” Proceedings of Connecting The Dots Workshop  (2020), 10.5281/zenodo.4088478.
  154. A. Barr, C. Lester,  and P. Stephens, “A variable for measuring masses at hadron colliders when missing energy is expected; mT2subscript𝑚T2m_{\text{T2}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT T2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: the truth behind the glamour,” J. Phys. G 29, 2343–2363 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0304226 [hep-ph] .
  155. C. G. Lester and B. Nachman, “Bisection-based asymmetric MT⁢2𝑇2{}_{T2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_T 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT computation: a higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods,” JHEP 03, 100 (2015), arXiv:1411.4312 [hep-ph] .
  156. L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, R. Nathvani,  and R. S. Thorne, “Ad Lucem: QED Parton Distribution Functions in the MMHT Framework,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 811 (2019c), arXiv:1907.02750 [hep-ph] .
  157. ATLAS Collaboration, “Luminosity determination in p⁢p𝑝𝑝ppitalic_p italic_p collisions at s=13𝑠13\sqrt{s}=13square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 982 (2023d), arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex] .
  158. G. Cowan, “Discovery sensitivity for a counting experiment with background uncertainty,” Royal Holloway, London  (2012), www.pp.rhul.ac.uk/~cowan/stat/medsig/medsigNote.pdf.
  159. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross,  and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,” Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1554 (2011), [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2501], arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an] .
  160. ATLAS Collaboration, “Technical Design Report for the Phase-II Upgrade of the ATLAS TDAQ System,” CERN-LHCC-2017-020  (2022b), 10.17181/CERN.2LBB.4IAL.
  161. L. Heinrich, “lukasheinrich/pylhe v0.0.4,”  (2018), 10.5281/zenodo.1217032.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 13 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free