Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 147 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 58 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 201 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Vertex Block Descent (2403.06321v4)

Published 10 Mar 2024 in cs.GR

Abstract: We introduce vertex block descent, a block coordinate descent solution for the variational form of implicit Euler through vertex-level Gauss-Seidel iterations. It operates with local vertex position updates that achieve reductions in global variational energy with maximized parallelism. This forms a physics solver that can achieve numerical convergence with unconditional stability and exceptional computation performance. It can also fit in a given computation budget by simply limiting the iteration count while maintaining its stability and superior convergence rate. We present and evaluate our method in the context of elastic body dynamics, providing details of all essential components and showing that it outperforms alternative techniques. In addition, we discuss and show examples of how our method can be used for other simulation systems, including particle-based simulations and rigid bodies.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (66)
  1. Uri M Ascher and Eddy Boxerman. 2003. On the modified conjugate gradient method in cloth simulation. The Visual Computer 19 (2003), 526–531.
  2. David Baraff and Andrew Witkin. 1998. Large Steps in Cloth Simulation. (1998).
  3. Corotated SPH for deformable solids. In Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Conference on Natural Phenomena (Munich, Germany) (NPH’09). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 27–34.
  4. Sparse matrix solvers on the GPU: conjugate gradients and multigrid. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 22, 3 (2003), 917–924.
  5. Projective dynamics: Fusing constraint projections for fast simulation. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2. 787–797.
  6. Robust treatment of collisions, contact and friction for cloth animation. In Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 594–603.
  7. Simulation of clothing with folds and wrinkles. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses. 3–es.
  8. A multiresolution framework for dynamic deformations. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. ACM, San Antonio Texas, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/545261.545268
  9. A simple geometric model for elastic deformations. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 4 (July 2010), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778775
  10. Shortest Path to Boundary for Self-Intersecting Meshes. 42, 4, Article 146 (2023), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592136
  11. Kwang-Jin Choi and Hyeong-Seok Ko. 2005. Stable but responsive cloth. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses on - SIGGRAPH ’05. ACM Press, Los Angeles, California, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1198555.1198571
  12. Implicit-Explicit Schemes for Fast Animation with Particle Systems. In Computer Animation and Simulation 2000, W. Hansmann, W. Purgathofer, F. Sillion, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, Daniel Thalmann, and Bruno Arnaldi (Eds.). Springer Vienna, Vienna, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6344-3_11 Series Title: Eurographics.
  13. Intersection-free Rigid Body Dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) 40, 4, Article 183 (2021).
  14. M. Fratarcangeli and F. Pellacini. 2015. Scalable Partitioning for Parallel Position Based Dynamics. Computer Graphics Forum 34, 2 (May 2015), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12570
  15. Vivace: a practical gauss-seidel method for stable soft body dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 6 (Nov. 2016), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2980179.2982437
  16. Optimization Integrator for Large Time Steps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21, 10 (Oct. 2015), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2459687
  17. Gene H Golub and Charles F Van Loan. 2013. Matrix computations. JHU press.
  18. CHARMS: A simple framework for adaptive simulation. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 21, 3 (2002), 281–290.
  19. Michael Hauth and Olaf Etzmuss. 2001. A High Performance Solver for the Animation of Deformable Objects using Advanced Numerical Methods. Computer Graphics Forum 20, 3 (Sept. 2001), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00524
  20. Updated sparse cholesky factors for corotational elastodynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 5 (Aug. 2012), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2231816.2231821
  21. An implicit finite element method for elastic solids in contact. In Proceedings Computer Animation 2001. Fourteenth Conference on Computer Animation (Cat. No.01TH8596). IEEE Comput. Soc, Seoul, South Korea, 136–254. https://doi.org/10.1109/CA.2001.982387
  22. Peter Huthwaite. 2014. Accelerated finite element elastodynamic simulations using the GPU. J. Comput. Phys. 257 (2014), 687–707.
  23. Symplectic-energy-momentum preserving variational integrators. J. Math. Phys. 40, 7 (July 1999), 3353–3371. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532892
  24. Variational integrators and the Newmark algorithm for conservative and dissipative mechanical systems. International Journal for numerical methods in engineering 49, 10 (2000), 1295–1325.
  25. Geometric, Variational Integrators for Computer Animation. In ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, Marie-Paule Cani and James O’Brien (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/SCA/SCA06/043-051
  26. Second-order Stencil Descent for Interior-point Hyperelasticity. ACM Transactions on Graphics 42, 4 (Aug. 2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592104
  27. Penetration-free projective dynamics on the GPU. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 41, 4 (2022), 1–16.
  28. A peridynamic perspective on spring-mass fracture. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (Copenhagen, Denmark) (SCA ’14). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 47–55.
  29. Variational time integrators. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 60, 1 (May 2004), 153–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.958
  30. P-cloth: interactive complex cloth simulation on multi-GPU systems using dynamic matrix assembly and pipelined implicit integrators. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 6 (2020), 1–15.
  31. Incremental potential contact: intersection-and inversion-free, large-deformation dynamics. ACM Trans. Graph. 39, 4 (2020), 49.
  32. Decomposed optimization time integrator for large-step elastodynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 38, 4 (Aug. 2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3322951
  33. Subspace-Preconditioned GPU Projective Dynamics with Contact for Cloth Simulation. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers. 1–12.
  34. Quasi-Newton Methods for Real-Time Simulation of Hyperelastic Materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics 36, 3 (June 2017), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2990496
  35. Primal/Dual Descent Methods for Dynamics. Computer Graphics Forum 39, 8 (Dec. 2020), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14104
  36. Unified particle physics for real-time applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, Article 153 (jul 2014), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601152
  37. XPBD: position-based simulation of compliant constrained dynamics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Motion in Games. ACM, Burlingame California, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994258.2994272
  38. Unified simulation of elastic rods, shells, and solids. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, Article 39 (jul 2010), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778776
  39. Example-based elastic materials. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers. 1–8.
  40. Brian Vincent Mirtich. 1996. Impulse-based dynamic simulation of rigid body systems. Ph. D. Dissertation. AAI9723116.
  41. Particle-based fluid simulation for interactive applications. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (San Diego, California) (SCA ’03). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 154–159.
  42. Stable real-time deformations. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. 49–54.
  43. Position based dynamics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 18, 2 (2007), 109–118.
  44. Meshless deformations based on shape matching. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 24, 3 (2005), 471–478.
  45. Point based animation of elastic, plastic and melting objects. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (Grenoble, France) (SCA ’04). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028523.1028542
  46. Adaptive block coordinate descent for distortion optimization. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 360–376.
  47. An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluids. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 4, Article 114 (jul 2015), 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766925
  48. Eftychios Sifakis and Jernej Barbic. 2012. FEM simulation of 3D deformable solids: A practitioner’s guide to theory, discretization and model reduction. ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, SIGGRAPH’12 (08 2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2343483.2343501
  49. Exact energy-momentum conserving algorithms and symplectic schemes for nonlinear dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 100, 1 (Oct. 1992), 63–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(92)90115-Z
  50. Stable neo-hookean flesh simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 37, 2 (2018), 1–15.
  51. A unified particle model for fluid–solid interactions: Research Articles. Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds 18, 1 (feb 2007), 69–82.
  52. Ari Stern and Eitan Grinspun. 2009. Implicit-Explicit Variational Integration of Highly Oscillatory Problems. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 7, 4 (Jan. 2009), 1779–1794. https://doi.org/10.1137/080732936 arXiv:0808.2239 [math].
  53. Implicit Formulation for SPH-based Viscous Fluids. Comput. Graph. Forum 34, 2 (may 2015), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12578
  54. Smoothed Aggregation Multigrid for Cloth Simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34 (Oct. 2015), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818081
  55. Robust quasistatic finite elements and flesh simulation. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. 181–190.
  56. Parallel block Neo-Hookean XPBD using graph clustering. Computers & Graphics 110 (Feb. 2023), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2022.10.009
  57. P. Volino and N. Magnenat-Thalmann. 2001. Comparing efficiency of integration methods for cloth simulation. In Proceedings. Computer Graphics International 2001. IEEE Comput. Soc, Hong Kong, China, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/CGI.2001.934683
  58. A simple approach to nonlinear tensile stiffness for accurate cloth simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 4, Article 105 (sep 2009), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1559755.1559762
  59. Embree: a kernel framework for efficient CPU ray tracing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 4 (2014), 1–8.
  60. Intel math kernel library. High-Performance Computing on the Intel® Xeon Phi™: How to Fully Exploit MIC Architectures (2014), 167–188.
  61. Huamin Wang. 2015. A chebyshev semi-iterative approach for accelerating projective and position-based dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34, 6 (Nov. 2015), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818063
  62. Huamin Wang and Yin Yang. 2016. Descent methods for elastic body simulation on the GPU. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 6 (Nov. 2016), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2980179.2980236
  63. Hierarchical Optimization Time Integration for CFL-Rate MPM Stepping. ACM Transactions on Graphics 39, 3 (June 2020), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386760
  64. Stephen J Wright. 2015. Coordinate descent algorithms. Mathematical programming 151, 1 (2015), 3–34.
  65. A scalable galerkin multigrid method for real-time simulation of deformable objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics 38, 6 (Dec. 2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3355089.3356486
  66. An efficient multigrid method for the simulation of high-resolution elastic solids. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 2 (March 2010), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731047.1731054
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel vertex-level block coordinate descent method that reduces variational energy, ensuring convergence and unconditional stability.
  • It integrates adaptive initialization, Chebyshev acceleration, and analytical local solutions to optimize iterations and handle collisions effectively.
  • Performance evaluations demonstrate superior convergence and parallel efficiency in large-scale elastic simulations compared to existing methods.

Vertex Block Descent: A New Approach to Physics-Based Simulation

The paper "Vertex Block Descent" introduces a novel block coordinate descent method designed specifically for solving the variational form of implicit Euler through vertex-level Gauss-Seidel iterations. The method achieves reductions in global variational energy via localized vertex position updates, leading to enhanced computational performance with significant parallelism. This results in a physics solver that not only ensures numerical convergence but also maintains unconditional stability.

Technical Overview

The core of the Vertex Block Descent (VBD) method is the application of block coordinate descent to each vertex in the mesh. For elastic body dynamics, VBD computes the new position for a single vertex at a time, holding all others fixed, and iteratively solves the global system using Gauss-Seidel iterations. This minimizes the local variational energy, defined by the vertex's mass, the time step, inertial potential, and the forces acting on it.

VBD introduces the concept of local systems, which focus on individual vertices and can be solved analytically using the Hessian matrix. This local approach ensures that, despite the small size of the systems involved, the global energy of the entire mesh is efficiently reduced. This is critical for maintaining the stability and quality of the simulation under a given computational budget, even with complex scenarios involving millions of degrees of freedom (DoFs) and active collisions.

Damping, Constraints, and Collisions

The method integrates damping efficiently by modifying the Hessian and force terms to account for velocity-based damping effects, thus preventing excessive oscillations and enhancing stability. For constraints, both unilateral and bilateral, VBD adjusts vertex positions within appropriately defined subspaces, ensuring that constraints are maintained throughout the simulation.

Significantly, VBD handles collisions through a quadratic collision potential that considers penetration depth. This collision energy formulation, along with a dynamic collision detection (CCD) mechanism, ensures robust collision handling, even in highly dynamic and densely packed scenarios. The friction forces are computed using a model inspired by incremental potential contact (IPC), guaranteeing that both static and dynamic friction are effectively simulated.

Initialization and Accelerated Iterations

The paper discusses a novel adaptive initialization strategy that combines the advantages of previous position and inertia-based initialization schemes. This adaptive scheme improves the initial guess for vertex positions, leading to faster convergence and better stability, particularly in scenarios with strict computation budgets or severe deformations.

To further enhance convergence rates, the paper utilizes the Chebyshev semi-iterative method for accelerating iterations. This method estimates the spectral radius of the system and adjusts the position updates dynamically, avoiding overshooting issues common in collision-intensive scenes by selectively skipping acceleration for colliding vertices.

Parallelization and GPU Implementation

VBD excels in parallelism due to its vertex-based approach. By coloring vertices instead of elements, VBD reduces the number of sequential groups (colors) required during parallel processing, thus significantly enhancing parallel efficiency compared to methods like XPBD. The paper introduces a two-phase processing method to handle vertex updates in parallel while avoiding race conditions induced by collisions, further enhancing the method's suitability for GPU implementation.

Performance and Stability

The method's performance is evaluated through various large-scale tests, stress tests, and unit tests, showcasing its ability to handle complex simulations involving millions of vertices and active collisions. Notably, VBD demonstrates remarkable stability even under extreme conditions such as severe deformations or high residuals from previous steps.

Comparative Analysis

Comparisons with existing methods such as preconditioned gradient descent (GD) and XPBD highlight VBD's superior convergence rates and stability without the need for frequent collision detection adjustments. VBD's vertex-based formulation outperforms XPBD, especially in scenarios involving high mass ratios or stiff materials, where XPBD struggles to maintain stability and realism.

Applications Beyond Elastic Bodies

The paper also extends the discussion to potential applications of VBD for other simulation problems such as particle-based simulations and rigid body dynamics. By defining suitable energy potentials and handling various DoF configurations (translational and rotational), VBD can robustly manage diverse simulation needs. This versatility suggests broad applicability in unified simulations combining different material types and interaction models.

Conclusion

The Vertex Block Descent method presents a robust and efficient approach to physics-based simulations, providing substantial improvements in stability, performance, and parallelism. Its application to elastic body dynamics, along with potential extensions to other simulation systems, underscores its versatility and computational efficacy. Future research directions may investigate impulse-based collision handling, advanced parallelization techniques, and further optimization in handling complex material interactions within unified simulations.

Overall, VBD sets a new benchmark for iterative descent-based solvers in the field of large-scale, real-time physics simulations, promising significant advancements in computational performance and simulation accuracy.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 6 tweets and received 1661 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com