Use of Nash equilibrium in finding game theoretic robust security bound on quantum bit error rate
Abstract: Nash equilibrium is employed to find a game theoretic robust security bound on quantum bit error rate (QBER) for DL04 protocol which is a scheme for quantum secure direct communication that has been experimentally realized recently. The receiver, sender and eavesdropper (Eve) are considered to be quantum players (players having the capability to perform quantum operations). Specifically, Eve is considered to have the capability of performing quantum attacks (e.g., W\'ojcik's original attack, W\'ojcik's symmetrized attack and Pavi\v{c}i\'c attack) and classical intercept and resend attack. Game theoretic analysis of the security of DL04 protocol in the above scenario is performed by considering several game scenarios. The analysis revealed the absence of a Pareto optimal Nash equilibrium point within these game scenarios. Consequently, mixed strategy Nash equilibrium points are identified and employed to establish both upper and lower bounds for QBER. Further, the vulnerability of the DL04 protocol to Pavi\v{c}i\'c attack in the message mode is established. In addition, it is observed that the quantum attacks performed by Eve are more powerful than the classical attack, as the QBER value and the probability of detecting Eve's presence are found to be lower in quantum attacks compared to classical ones.
- P. C. Ordeshook et al., Cambridge Books (1986).
- A. M. Colman, Game theory and its applications: In the social and biological sciences (Psychology Press, 2013).
- M. A. Nowak and K. Sigmund, Nature 398, 367 (1999).
- M. Dresher, Some military applications of the Theory of Games (Rand, 1959).
- R. Hardin, One for all: The logic of group conflict (Princeton University Press, 1997).
- J. F. Nash Jr, Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences 36, 48 (1950).
- J. Nash, Annals of Mathematics , 286 (1951).
- A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Physical Review Letters 49, 91 (1982).
- D. A. Meyer, Physical Review Letters 82, 1052 (1999).
- J. Eisert, M. Wilkens, and M. Lewenstein, Physical Review Letters 83, 3077 (1999).
- H. Guo, J. Zhang, and G. J. Koehler, Decision Support Systems 46, 318 (2008).
- L. Vaidman, Foundations of Physics 29, 615 (1999).
- L. Goldenberg, L. Vaidman, and S. Wiesner, Physical Review Letters 82, 3356 (1999).
- N. Patel, Nature 445, 144 (2007).
- A. Flitney and D. Abbott, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 324, 152 (2003).
- A. Dutta and A. Pathak, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.13089 (2022a).
- A. Dutta and A. Pathak, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05470 (2023a).
- A. K. Ekert, Physical Review Letters 67, 661 (1991).
- N. Gisin and B. Huttner, Physics Letters A 228, 13 (1997).
- R. F. Werner, Physical Review A 58, 1827 (1998).
- F.-G. Deng and G. L. Long, Physical Review A 69, 052319 (2004a).
- T. Hwang, C. Hwang, and C. Tsai, The European Physical Journal D 61, 785 (2011).
- A. Dutta and A. Pathak, Quantum Information Processing 21, 369 (2022b).
- A. Dutta and A. Pathak, Quantum Information Processing 22, 13 (2023b).
- G.-L. Long and X.-S. Liu, Physical Review A 65, 032302 (2002).
- K. Boström and T. Felbinger, Physical Review Letters 89, 187902 (2002).
- F.-G. Deng, G. L. Long, and X.-S. Liu, Physical Review A 68, 042317 (2003).
- L. Zhou, Y.-B. Sheng, and G.-L. Long, Science Bulletin 65, 12 (2020a).
- F.-G. Deng and G. L. Long, Physical Review A 70, 012311 (2004b).
- M. Lucamarini and S. Mancini, Physical Review Letters 94, 140501 (2005).
- H. Lu, JOSA B 36, B26 (2019).
- D. Pan, X.-T. Song, and G.-L. Long, Advanced Devices & Instrumentation 4, 0004 (2023).
- E. W. Piotrowski and J. Sładkowski, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42, 1089 (2003).
- R. Alonso-Sanz, Quantum game simulation, Vol. 36 (Springer, 2019).
- J. Bostanci and J. Watrous, Quantum 6, 882 (2022).
- H. Kaur and A. Kumar, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 490, 1415 (2018).
- M. J. Osborne et al., An introduction to game theory, Vol. 3 (Oxford University Press New York, 2004).
- J. Eisert and M. Wilkens, Journal of Modern Optics 47, 2543 (2000).
- S. J. van Enk and R. Pike, Physical Review A 66, 024306 (2002).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
- M. M. Wilde, Quantum information theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
- J. Watrous, The theory of quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
- A. Pathak, Elements of quantum computation and quantum communication (CRC Press Boca Raton, 2013).
- M. Krelina, EPJ Quantum Technology 8, 24 (2021).
- A. Wójcik, Physical Review Letters 90, 157901 (2003).
- M. Pavičić, Physical Review A 87, 042326 (2013).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.