Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Embedded Deployment of Semantic Segmentation in Medicine through Low-Resolution Inputs

Published 8 Mar 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG | (2403.05340v1)

Abstract: When deploying neural networks in real-life situations, the size and computational effort are often the limiting factors. This is especially true in environments where big, expensive hardware is not affordable, like in embedded medical devices, where budgets are often tight. State-of-the-art proposed multiple different lightweight solutions for such use cases, mostly by changing the base model architecture, not taking the input and output resolution into consideration. In this paper, we propose our architecture that takes advantage of the fact that in hardware-limited environments, we often refrain from using the highest available input resolutions to guarantee a higher throughput. Although using lower-resolution input leads to a significant reduction in computing and memory requirements, it may also incur reduced prediction quality. Our architecture addresses this problem by exploiting the fact that we can still utilize high-resolution ground-truths in training. The proposed model inputs lower-resolution images and high-resolution ground truths, which can improve the prediction quality by 5.5% while adding less than 200 parameters to the model. %reducing the frames per second only from 25 to 20. We conduct an extensive analysis to illustrate that our architecture enhances existing state-of-the-art frameworks for lightweight semantic segmentation of cancer in MRI images. We also tested the deployment speed of state-of-the-art lightweight networks and our architecture on Nvidia's Jetson Nano to emulate deployment in resource-constrained embedded scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. S. L. Oh, Y. Hagiwara, U. Raghavendra, R. Yuvaraj, N. Arunkumar, M. Murugappan, and U. R. Acharya, “A deep learning approach for parkinson’s disease diagnosis from eeg signals,” Neural Comput. and App., vol. 32, pp. 10927–10933, 2020.
  2. L. A. Gemein, R. T. Schirrmeister, P. Chrabaszcz, D. Wilson, J. Boedecker, A. Schulze-Bonhage, F. Hutter, and T. Ball, “Machine-learning-based diagnostics of eeg pathology,” NeuroImage, vol. 220, p. 117021, 2020.
  3. E. M. Masutani, N. Bahrami, and A. Hsiao, “Deep learning single-frame and multiframe super-resolution for cardiac mri,” Radiology, vol. 295, no. 3, pp. 552–561, 2020.
  4. S. Zhang, G. Liang, S. Pan, and L. Zheng, “A fast medical image super resolution method based on deep learning network,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 12319–12327, 2018.
  5. K. Suzuki, “Pixel-based machine learning in medical imaging,” Journal of Biomed. Imaging, vol. 2012, pp. 1–1, 2012.
  6. J. Antony, K. McGuinness, N. E. O’Connor, and K. Moran, “Quantifying radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity using deep convolutional neural networks,” in Inter. conf. on pattern recog., pp. 1195–1200, IEEE, 2016.
  7. W. Shen, M. Zhou, F. Yang, C. Yang, and J. Tian, “Multi-scale convolutional neural networks for lung nodule classification,” in Inter. Conf. for Inf. Proc. in Med. Imaging, pp. 588–599, Springer, 2015.
  8. C.-W. Wang, C.-T. Huang, M.-C. Hsieh, C.-H. Li, S.-W. Chang, W.-C. Li, R. Vandaele, R. Marée, S. Jodogne, P. Geurts, et al., “Evaluation and comparison of anatomical landmark detection methods for cephalometric x-ray images: a grand challenge,” IEEE trans. on medical imaging, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1890–1900, 2015.
  9. B. D. De Vos, J. M. Wolterink, P. A. De Jong, M. A. Viergever, and I. Išgum, “2d image classification for 3d anatomy localization: employing deep convolutional neural networks,” in Medical imaging 2016: Image proc., vol. 9784, pp. 517–523, SPIE, 2016.
  10. Z. Li, M. Dong, S. Wen, X. Hu, P. Zhou, and Z. Zeng, “Clu-cnns: Object detection for medical images,” Neurocomput., vol. 350, pp. 53–59, 2019.
  11. M. Marsousi, K. N. Plataniotis, and S. Stergiopoulos, “Shape-based kidney detection and segmentation in three-dimensional abdominal ultrasound images,” in Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Med. and Bio. Society, pp. 2890–2894, 2014.
  12. Ö. Çiçek, A. Abdulkadir, S. S. Lienkamp, T. Brox, and O. Ronneberger, “3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation,” in Med. Image Comput. and Comput.-Ass. Interv. (MICCAI), pp. 424–432, Springer, 2016.
  13. M. Rezaei, H. Yang, and C. Meinel, “Recurrent generative adversarial network for learning imbalanced medical image semantic segmentation,” Multimed. Tools and Appl., vol. 79, no. 21-22, pp. 15329–15348, 2020.
  14. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Med. Image Comput. and Comput.-Ass. Interv., pp. 234–241, Springer, 2015.
  15. Y. Deng, Y. Hou, J. Yan, and D. Zeng, “Elu-net: an efficient and lightweight u-net for medical image segmentation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 35932–35941, 2022.
  16. H. Huang, L. Lin, R. Tong, H. Hu, Q. Zhang, Y. Iwamoto, X. Han, Y.-W. Chen, and J. Wu, “Unet 3+: A full-scale connected unet for medical image segmentation,” in IEEE inter. conf. on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp. 1055–1059, 2020.
  17. M. Antonelli, A. Reinke, S. Bakas, K. Farahani, A. Kopp-Schneider, B. A. Landman, G. Litjens, B. Menze, O. Ronneberger, R. M. Summers, et al., “The medical segmentation decathlon,” Nature comm., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4128, 2022.
  18. B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, Y. Burren, N. Porz, J. Slotboom, R. Wiest, et al., “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),” IEEE trans. on med. imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2014.
  19. S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. S. Kirby, J. B. Freymann, K. Farahani, and C. Davatzikos, “Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma mri collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features,” Scien. data, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.
  20. S. Bakas, M. Reyes, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, M. Rempfler, A. Crimi, R. T. Shinohara, C. Berger, S. M. Ha, M. Rozycki, et al., “Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge,” arXiv preprint:1811.02629, 2018.
  21. C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Alemi, “Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning,” in AAAI conf. on arti. Intell., vol. 31, 2017.
  22. L. Tan, W. Ma, J. Xia, and S. Sarker, “Multimodal magnetic resonance image brain tumor segmentation based on acu-net network,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 14608–14618, 2021.
  23. A. Myronenko, “3d mri brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization,” in Inter. MICCAI Brainlesion Works., pp. 311–320, Springer, 2019.
  24. P. Ahmad, H. Jin, R. Alroobaea, S. Qamar, R. Zheng, F. Alnajjar, and F. Aboudi, “Mh unet: A multi-scale hierarchical based architecture for medical image segmentation,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 148384–148408, 2021.
  25. Z. Jiang, C. Ding, M. Liu, and D. Tao, “Two-stage cascaded u-net: 1st place solution to brats challenge 2019 segmentation task,” in Inter. MICCAI Brainlesion Works., pp. 231–241, Springer, 2020.
  26. S. T. Bukhari and H. Mohy-ud Din, “E1d3 u-net for brain tumor segmentation: Submission to the rsna-asnr-miccai brats 2021 challenge,” in Inter. MICCAI Brainlesion Works., pp. 276–288, Springer, 2021.
  27. H. Peiris, Z. Chen, G. Egan, and M. Harandi, “Reciprocal adversarial learning for brain tumor segmentation: a solution to brats challenge 2021 segmentation task,” in Inter. MICCAI Brainlesion Works., pp. 171–181, Springer, 2021.
  28. F. Zabihollahy, N. Schieda, S. Krishna Jeyaraj, and E. Ukwatta, “Automated segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on t2-weighted (t2w) and apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) map mr images using u-nets,” Medical physics, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 3078–3090, 2019.
  29. D. Nie and D. Shen, “Semantic-guided encoder feature learning for blurry boundary delineation,” arXiv preprint:1906.04306, 2019.
  30. Q. Zhu, B. Du, and P. Yan, “Boundary-weighted domain adaptive neural network for prostate mr image segmentation,” IEEE trans. on medical imaging, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 753–763, 2019.
  31. B. Wang, Y. Lei, S. Tian, T. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Patel, A. B. Jani, H. Mao, W. J. Curran, T. Liu, et al., “Deeply supervised 3d fully convolutional networks with group dilated convolution for automatic mri prostate segmentation,” Medical physics, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1707–1718, 2019.
  32. Z. Zhou, M. M. Rahman Siddiquee, N. Tajbakhsh, and J. Liang, “Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation,” in Inter. Works., DLMIA 2018, and ML-CDS 2018, with MICCAI, pp. 3–11, Springer, 2018.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.