Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The response of the Moon to gravitational waves

Published 8 Mar 2024 in gr-qc | (2403.05118v1)

Abstract: The response of the Moon to gravitational waves (GWs) is used by some of the proposed lunar GW detectors like the Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna (LGWA) to turn the Moon into an antenna for GWs. The deep connection between the lunar internal structure, its geophysical environment and the study of the Universe is intriguing, but given our limited understanding of the Moon today, it also makes it very difficult to predict the science potential of lunar GW detectors accurately. Lunar response models have been developed since the Apollo program, but there is evidence coming from seismic measurements during the Apollo missions that the models are not good enough and possibly underestimating the lunar GW response especially in the decihertz frequency band. In this paper, we will provide an extension of Freeman Dyson's half-space model to include horizontally layered geologies, which allows us to carry out computationally efficient calculations of the lunar GW response above 0.1\,Hz compared to the normal-mode simulations used in the past. We analyze how the results depend on the values of geometric and elastic parameters of the layered geological model, and we find that modifications of the geological model as required to explain Apollo seismic observations can boost the lunar GW response.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. M. Coughlin and J. Harms, Constraining the gravitational-wave energy density of the Universe in the range 0.1 Hz to 1 Hz using the Apollo Seismic Array, Phys. Rev. D 90, 102001 (2014a).
  2. K. Jani and A. Loeb, Gravitational-wave Lunar Observatory for Cosmology, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (06), 044.
  3. ET Steering Committee, Einstein Telescope design report update 2020, available from European Gravitational Observatory, document number ET-0007B-20  (2020).
  4. J. Harms, Seismic background limitation of lunar gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 071102 (2022).
  5. A. Ben-Menahem, Excitation of the Earth’s eigenvibrations by gravitational radiation from astrophysical sources, Il Nuovo Cimento C 6, 49 (1983).
  6. M. Coughlin and J. Harms, Constraining the gravitational wave energy density of the Universe using Earth’s ring, Phys. Rev. D 90, 042005 (2014b).
  7. F. J. Dyson, Seismic Response of the Earth to a Gravitational Wave in the 1-Hz Band, Astrophys. J. 156, 529 (1969).
  8. J. Harms, Terrestrial gravity fluctuations, Living Reviews in Relativity 22, 6 (2019).
  9. J. A. Lobo, What can we learn about gravitational wave physics with an elastic spherical antenna?, Phys. Rev. D 52, 591 (1995).
  10. W. J. H., The calculation of the eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions of the free oscillations of the earth and sun, Seismological Algorithms: Computational Methods and Computer Programs , 321 (1988).
  11. S. Menina, Seismic attenuation in the Martian lithosphere from InSight-SEIS data : separation and stratification of scattering and absorption processes, Theses, Université Paris Cité (2023).
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 10 likes about this paper.