Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Multi-Robot Autonomous Exploration and Mapping Under Localization Uncertainty with Expectation-Maximization

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cs.RO | (2403.04021v1)

Abstract: We propose an autonomous exploration algorithm designed for decentralized multi-robot teams, which takes into account map and localization uncertainties of range-sensing mobile robots. Virtual landmarks are used to quantify the combined impact of process noise and sensor noise on map uncertainty. Additionally, we employ an iterative expectation-maximization inspired algorithm to assess the potential outcomes of both a local robot's and its neighbors' next-step actions. To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct a comparative analysis with state-of-the-art algorithms. The results of our experiments show the proposed algorithm's capacity to strike a balance between curbing map uncertainty and achieving efficient task allocation among robots.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. J. A. Placed, J. Strader, H. Carrillo, N. Atanasov, V. Indelman, L. Carlone, and J. A. Castellanos, “A survey on active simultaneous localization and mapping: State of the art and new frontiers,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1686–1705, 2023.
  2. C. Cadena, L. Carlone, H. Carrillo, Y. Latif, D. Scaramuzza, J. Neira, I. Reid, and J. J. Leonard, “Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1309–1332, 2016.
  3. W. Burgard, M. Moors, C. Stachniss, and F. E. Schneider, “Coordinated multi-robot exploration,” IEEE Transactions on robotics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 376–386, 2005.
  4. D. Fox, J. Ko, K. Konolige, B. Limketkai, D. Schulz, and B. Stewart, “Distributed multirobot exploration and mapping,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1325–1339, 2006.
  5. D. Jang, J. Yoo, C. Y. Son, D. Kim, and H. J. Kim, “Multi-robot active sensing and environmental model learning with distributed gaussian process,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 5905–5912, 2020.
  6. J. Yu, J. Tong, Y. Xu, Z. Xu, H. Dong, T. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Smmr-explore: Submap-based multi-robot exploration system with multi-robot multi-target potential field exploration method,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021, pp. 8779–8785.
  7. N. Atanasov, J. Le Ny, K. Daniilidis, and G. J. Pappas, “Decentralized active information acquisition: Theory and application to multi-robot slam,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015, pp. 4775–4782.
  8. M. Kontitsis, E. A. Theodorou, and E. Todorov, “Multi-robot active slam with relative entropy optimization,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, pp. 2757–2764.
  9. M. Corah, C. O’Meadhra, K. Goel, and N. Michael, “Communication-efficient planning and mapping for multi-robot exploration in large environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1715–1721, 2019.
  10. J. Wang and B. Englot, “Autonomous exploration with expectation-maximization,” in Robotics Research: The 18th International Symposium (ISRR).   Springer, 2017, pp. 759–774.
  11. B. Charrow, V. Kumar, and N. Michael, “Approximate representations for multi-robot control policies that maximize mutual information,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 37, pp. 383–400, 2014.
  12. R. G. Colares and L. Chaimowicz, “The next frontier: Combining information gain and distance cost for decentralized multi-robot exploration,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2016, pp. 268–274.
  13. T. Regev and V. Indelman, “Multi-robot decentralized belief space planning in unknown environments via efficient re-evaluation of impacted paths,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016, pp. 5591–5598.
  14. B. Schlotfeldt, D. Thakur, N. Atanasov, V. Kumar, and G. J. Pappas, “Anytime planning for decentralized multirobot active information gathering,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1025–1032, 2018.
  15. S. Chen, L. Zhao, S. Huang, and Q. Hao, “Multi-robot active slam based on submap-joining for feature-based representation environments,” in Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2022.
  16. M. Lauri, E. Heinänen, and S. Frintrop, “Multi-robot active information gathering with periodic communication,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 851–856.
  17. L. Freda, M. Gianni, F. Pirri, A. Gawel, R. Dubé, R. Siegwart, and C. Cadena, “3d multi-robot patrolling with a two-level coordination strategy,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 43, pp. 1747–1779, 2019.
  18. Y. Kantaros, B. Schlotfeldt, N. Atanasov, and G. J. Pappas, “Asymptotically optimal planning for non-myopic multi-robot information gathering.” in Robotics: Science and Systems, 2019, pp. 22–26.
  19. M. F. Ginting, K. Otsu, J. A. Edlund, J. Gao, and A.-A. Agha-Mohammadi, “Chord: Distributed data-sharing via hybrid ros 1 and 2 for multi-robot exploration of large-scale complex environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5064–5071, 2021.
  20. K. Ye, S. Dong, Q. Fan, H. Wang, L. Yi, F. Xia, J. Wang, and B. Chen, “Multi-robot active mapping via neural bipartite graph matching,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 14 839–14 848.
  21. M. Tzes, N. Bousias, E. Chatzipantazis, and G. J. Pappas, “Graph neural networks for multi-robot active information acquisition,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 3497–3503.
  22. M. Ossenkopf, G. Castro, F. Pessacg, K. Geihs, and P. De Cristóforis, “Long-horizon active slam system for multi-agent coordinated exploration,” in European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2019, pp. 1–6.
  23. V. Indelman, “Cooperative multi-robot belief space planning for autonomous navigation in unknown environments,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 42, pp. 353–373, 2018.
  24. Y. Chen, L. Zhao, K. M. B. Lee, C. Yoo, S. Huang, and R. Fitch, “Broadcast your weaknesses: Cooperative active pose-graph slam for multiple robots,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2200–2207, 2020.
  25. M. Kaess, H. Johannsson, R. Roberts, V. Ila, J. J. Leonard, and F. Dellaert, “isam2: Incremental smoothing and mapping using the bayes tree,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 216–235, 2012.
  26. J. Wang, F. Chen, Y. Huang, J. McConnell, T. Shan, and B. Englot, “Virtual maps for autonomous exploration of cluttered underwater environments,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 916–935, 2022.
  27. S. Thrun, “Probabilistic robotics,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 52–57, 2002.
  28. M. Kaess and F. Dellaert, “Covariance recovery from a square root information matrix for data association,” Robotics and autonomous systems, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1198–1210, 2009.
  29. X. Fan, Y. Guo, H. Liu, B. Wei, and W. Lyu, “Improved artificial potential field method applied for AUV path planning,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, pp. 1–21, 2020.
  30. J. McConnell, Y. Huang, P. Szenher, I. Collado-Gonzalez, and B. Englot, “DRACo-SLAM: Distributed robust acoustic communication-efficient SLAM for imaging sonar equipped underwater robot teams,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 8457–8464.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.