Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

D6 branes wrapped on a spindle and $Y^{p,q}$ manifolds

Published 6 Mar 2024 in hep-th | (2403.03988v2)

Abstract: We present new solutions of 8d gauged supergravity which, upon uplift to type IIA, represent D6 branes wrapped on spindles. A further circle uplift gives 11d supergravity on a Calabi-Yau three-fold which is the cone over five-dimensional $Y{p,q}$ manifolds. This highlights a connection between co-homogeneity one Sasaki-Einstein metrics in general dimension and the recently introduced spindle solutions in gauged supergravity. We find that a similar connection also exists for the small resolution of the Calabi-Yau cone over such manifolds.

Authors (1)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (50)
  1. J. Sparks, “Sasaki-Einstein Manifolds,” Surveys Diff. Geom. 16 (2011) 265–324, arXiv:1004.2461 [math.DG].
  2. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S**2 x S**3,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8 no. 4, (2004) 711–734, arXiv:hep-th/0403002.
  3. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. F. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “A New infinite class of Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8 no. 6, (2004) 987–1000, arXiv:hep-th/0403038.
  4. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and D. Waldram, “Supersymmetric AdS(5) solutions of M theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 4335–4366, arXiv:hep-th/0402153.
  5. M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D. N. Page, and C. N. Pope, “New Einstein-Sasaki spaces in five and higher dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 071101, arXiv:hep-th/0504225.
  6. M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D. N. Page, and C. N. Pope, “New Einstein-Sasaki and Einstein spaces from Kerr-de Sitter,” JHEP 07 (2009) 082, arXiv:hep-th/0505223.
  7. T. Friedrich and S. Ivanov, “Parallel spinors and connections with skew symmetric torsion in string theory,” Asian J. Math. 6 (2002) 303–336, arXiv:math/0102142.
  8. J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, D. Martelli, and D. Waldram, “Five-branes wrapped on SLAG three cycles and related geometry,” JHEP 11 (2001) 018, arXiv:hep-th/0110034.
  9. J. P. Gauntlett and S. Pakis, “The Geometry of D = 11 killing spinors,” JHEP 04 (2003) 039, arXiv:hep-th/0212008.
  10. J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, S. Pakis, and D. Waldram, “G structures and wrapped NS5-branes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 247 (2004) 421–445, arXiv:hep-th/0205050.
  11. N. Kim, “AdS(3) solutions of IIB supergravity from D3-branes,” JHEP 01 (2006) 094, arXiv:hep-th/0511029.
  12. N. Kim and J.-D. Park, “Comments on AdS(2) solutions of D=11 supergravity,” JHEP 09 (2006) 041, arXiv:hep-th/0607093.
  13. J. P. Gauntlett and N. Kim, “Geometries with Killing Spinors and Supersymmetric AdS Solutions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 284 (2008) 897–918, arXiv:0710.2590 [hep-th].
  14. P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. Pérez Ipiña, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 11, (2021) 111601, arXiv:2011.10579 [hep-th].
  15. S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, “Rotating multi-charge spindles and their microstates,” JHEP 07 (2021) 182, arXiv:2104.11249 [hep-th].
  16. A. Boido, J. M. P. Ipiña, and J. Sparks, “Twisted D3-brane and M5-brane compactifications from multi-charge spindles,” JHEP 07 (2021) 222, arXiv:2104.13287 [hep-th].
  17. P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, “Supersymmetric spindles,” JHEP 01 (2022) 102, arXiv:2112.01543 [hep-th].
  18. P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. P. Ipiña, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Accelerating black holes and spinning spindles,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 4, (2021) 046007, arXiv:2012.08530 [hep-th].
  19. D. Cassani, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Thermodynamics of accelerating and supersymmetric AdS4 black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 086005, arXiv:2106.05571 [hep-th].
  20. P. Ferrero, M. Inglese, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Multicharge accelerating black holes and spinning spindles,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 12, (2022) 126001, arXiv:2109.14625 [hep-th].
  21. C. Couzens, “A tale of (M)2 twists,” JHEP 03 (2022) 078, arXiv:2112.04462 [hep-th].
  22. P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “M5-branes wrapped on a spindle,” JHEP 11 (2021) 002, arXiv:2105.13344 [hep-th].
  23. S. Giri, “Black holes with spindles at the horizon,” JHEP 06 (2022) 145, arXiv:2112.04431 [hep-th].
  24. F. Faedo and D. Martelli, “D4-branes wrapped on a spindle,” JHEP 02 (2022) 101, arXiv:2111.13660 [hep-th].
  25. C. Couzens and K. Stemerdink, “Universal spindles: D2’s on ΣΣ\Sigmaroman_Σ and M5’s on Σ×ℍ3Σsuperscriptℍ3\Sigma\times\mathbb{H}^{3}roman_Σ × blackboard_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT,” arXiv:2207.06449 [hep-th].
  26. I. Arav, J. P. Gauntlett, M. M. Roberts, and C. Rosen, “Leigh-Strassler compactified on a spindle,” JHEP 10 (2022) 067, arXiv:2207.06427 [hep-th].
  27. M. Suh, “Spindle black holes from mass-deformed ABJM,” arXiv:2211.11782 [hep-th].
  28. M. Suh, “Baryonic spindles from conifolds,” arXiv:2304.03308 [hep-th].
  29. K. Hristov and M. Suh, “Spindle black holes in AdS×4{}_{4}\timesstart_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT × SE77{}_{7}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT,” JHEP 10 (2023) 141, arXiv:2307.10378 [hep-th].
  30. A. Amariti, S. Mancani, D. Morgante, N. Petri, and A. Segati, “BBBW on the spindle,” arXiv:2309.11362 [hep-th].
  31. A. Amariti, N. Petri, and A. Segati, “T1,111{}^{1,1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 , 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT truncation on the spindle,” JHEP 07 (2023) 087, arXiv:2304.03663 [hep-th].
  32. I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, and E. Nardoni, “Holographic Duals of Argyres-Douglas Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 21, (2021) 211601, arXiv:2105.11567 [hep-th].
  33. M. Suh, “D3-branes and M5-branes wrapped on a topological disc,” JHEP 03 (2022) 043, arXiv:2108.01105 [hep-th].
  34. M. Suh, “M2-branes wrapped on a topological disk,” JHEP 09 (2022) 048, arXiv:2109.13278 [hep-th].
  35. C. Couzens, K. Stemerdink, and D. van de Heisteeg, “M2-branes on discs and multi-charged spindles,” JHEP 04 (2022) 107, arXiv:2110.00571 [hep-th].
  36. M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on a topological disk,” JHEP 06 (2023) 008, arXiv:2108.08326 [hep-th].
  37. I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, and E. Nardoni, “M5-brane sources, holography, and Argyres-Douglas theories,” JHEP 11 (2021) 140, arXiv:2106.01322 [hep-th].
  38. C. Couzens, H. Kim, N. Kim, and Y. Lee, “Holographic duals of M5-branes on an irregularly punctured sphere,” JHEP 07 (2022) 102, arXiv:2204.13537 [hep-th].
  39. P. Karndumri and P. Nuchino, “Five-branes wrapped on topological disks from 7D N=2 gauged supergravity,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 6, (2022) 066010, arXiv:2201.05037 [hep-th].
  40. M. Suh, “M5-branes and D4-branes wrapped on a direct product of spindle and Riemann surface,” arXiv:2207.00034 [hep-th].
  41. C. Couzens, H. Kim, N. Kim, Y. Lee, and M. Suh, “D4-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds through consistent truncation,” JHEP 02 (2023) 025, arXiv:2210.15695 [hep-th].
  42. K. C. M. Cheung, J. H. T. Fry, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, “M5-branes wrapped on four-dimensional orbifolds,” JHEP 08 (2022) 082, arXiv:2204.02990 [hep-th].
  43. P. Bomans, C. Couzens, Y. Lee, and S. Ning, “Symmetry Breaking and Consistent Truncations from M5-branes Wrapping a Disc,” arXiv:2308.08616 [hep-th].
  44. F. Faedo, A. Fontanarossa, and D. Martelli, “Branes wrapped on quadrilaterals,” arXiv:2402.08724 [hep-th].
  45. M. Boisvert and P. Ferrero, “A story of non-conformal branes: spindles, disks, circles and black holes,”. To appear.
  46. J. D. Edelstein and C. Nunez, “D6-branes and M theory geometrical transitions from gauged supergravity,” JHEP 04 (2001) 028, arXiv:hep-th/0103167.
  47. E. Witten, “Topological Quantum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353.
  48. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Resolutions of non-regular Ricci-flat Kahler cones,” J. Geom. Phys. 59 (2009) 1175–1195, arXiv:0707.1674 [math.DG].
  49. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Baryonic branches and resolutions of Ricci-flat Kahler cones,” JHEP 04 (2008) 067, arXiv:0709.2894 [hep-th].
  50. A. Salam and E. Sezgin, “d=8 supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B 258 (1985) 284–304.
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate All Videos Subscribe on YouTube

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.

Sign Up for Free