Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Non-thermal eigenstates and slow relaxation in quantum Fredkin spin chains

Published 6 Mar 2024 in cond-mat.stat-mech and quant-ph | (2403.03986v2)

Abstract: We study the dynamics and thermalization of the Fredkin spin chain, a system with local three-body interactions, particle conservation and explicit kinetic constraints. We consider deformations away from its stochastic point in order to tune between regimes where kinetic energy dominates and those where potential energy does. By means of exact diagonalisation, perturbation theory and variational matrix product states, we show there is a sudden change of behaviour in the dynamics that occurs, from one of fast thermalization to one of slow metastable (prethermal) dynamics near the stochastic point. This change in relaxation is connected to the emergence of additional kinetic constraints which lead to the fragmentation of Hilbert space in the limit of a large potential energy. We also show that this change can lead to thermalization being evaded for special initial conditions due to non-thermal eigenstates (akin to quantum many-body scars). We provide clear evidence for the existence of these non-thermal states for large system sizes even when far from the large-potential-energy limit, and explain their connection to the emergent kinetic constraints.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (52)
  1. J.Ā M.Ā Deutsch,Ā Phys. Rev. AĀ 43,Ā 2046 (1991).
  2. M.Ā Srednicki,Ā Phys. Rev. EĀ 50,Ā 888 (1994).
  3. J.Ā M.Ā Deutsch,Ā Rep. Prog. PhysĀ 81,Ā 082001 (2018).
  4. M.Ā Rigol, V.Ā Dunjko,Ā andĀ M.Ā Olshanii,Ā NatureĀ 452,Ā 854 (2008).
  5. W.Ā Beugeling, R.Ā Moessner,Ā andĀ M.Ā Haque,Ā Phys. Rev. EĀ 89,Ā 042112 (2014).
  6. W.Ā Beugeling, R.Ā Moessner,Ā andĀ M.Ā Haque,Ā Phys. Rev. EĀ 91,Ā 012144 (2015).
  7. A.Ā Dymarsky, N.Ā Lashkari,Ā andĀ H.Ā Liu,Ā Phys. Rev. EĀ 97,Ā 012140 (2018).
  8. S.Ā Sugimoto, R.Ā Hamazaki,Ā andĀ M.Ā Ueda,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 129,Ā 030602 (2022).
  9. L.Ā VidmarĀ andĀ M.Ā Rigol,Ā J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.Ā 2016 (6),Ā 064007.
  10. D.Ā Basko, I.Ā Aleiner,Ā andĀ B.Ā Altshuler,Ā Ann. Phys.Ā 321,Ā 1126 (2006).
  11. V.Ā OganesyanĀ andĀ D.Ā A.Ā Huse,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 75,Ā 155111 (2007).
  12. R.Ā NandkishoreĀ andĀ D.Ā A.Ā Huse,Ā Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.Ā 6,Ā 15 (2015).
  13. D.Ā Sels,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 106,Ā L020202 (2022).
  14. P.Ā Fendley,Ā J. Stat. Mech.: Theory ExpĀ 2012,Ā P11020 (2012).
  15. S.Ā D.Ā Sarma, M.Ā Freedman,Ā andĀ C.Ā Nayak,Ā npj Quantum Inf.Ā 1,Ā 15001 (2015).
  16. P.Ā Fendley,Ā J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.Ā 49,Ā 30LT01 (2016).
  17. M.Ā van Horssen, E.Ā Levi,Ā andĀ J.Ā P.Ā Garrahan,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 92,Ā 100305 (2015).
  18. J.Ā M.Ā Hickey, S.Ā Genway,Ā andĀ J.Ā P.Ā Garrahan,Ā J. Stat. Mech.: Theory ExpĀ 2016,Ā 054047 (2016).
  19. J.Ā Feldmeier, F.Ā Pollmann,Ā andĀ M.Ā Knap,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 123,Ā 040601 (2019).
  20. B.Ā Bertini, P.Ā Kos,Ā andĀ T.Ā Prosen,Ā arXiv: 2306.12467Ā  (2023).
  21. E.Ā van Nieuwenburg, Y.Ā Baum,Ā andĀ G.Ā Refael,Ā Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.Ā 116,Ā 9269 (2019).
  22. G.Ā CipolloniĀ andĀ J.Ā Kudler-Flam,Ā arXiv: 2303.03448Ā  (2023).
  23. M. Žnidarič,Ā Phys. Rev. Res.Ā 4,Ā 033041 (2022).
  24. M.Ā Serbyn, D.Ā A.Ā Abanin,Ā andĀ Z.Ā Papić,Ā Nat. Phys.Ā 17,Ā 675 (2021).
  25. S.Ā Moudgalya, B.Ā A.Ā Bernevig,Ā andĀ N.Ā Regnault,Ā Rep. Prog. PhysĀ 85,Ā 086501 (2022).
  26. Z.Ā Papić,Ā Weak ergodicity breaking through the lens of quantum entanglement,Ā inĀ Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications,Ā edited byĀ A.Ā Bayat, S.Ā Bose,Ā andĀ H.Ā JohannessonĀ (Springer International Publishing,Ā Cham,Ā 2022)Ā pp.Ā 341–395.
  27. P.Ā Fendley, K.Ā Sengupta,Ā andĀ S.Ā Sachdev,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 69,Ā 075106 (2004).
  28. I.Ā Lesanovsky,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 106,Ā 025301 (2011).
  29. S.Ā Moudgalya, N.Ā Regnault,Ā andĀ B.Ā A.Ā Bernevig,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 98,Ā 235156 (2018).
  30. C.-J.Ā LinĀ andĀ O.Ā I.Ā Motrunich,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 122,Ā 173401 (2019).
  31. M.Ā SchecterĀ andĀ T.Ā Iadecola,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 123,Ā 147201 (2019).
  32. C.Ā M.Ā LanglettĀ andĀ S.Ā Xu,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 103,Ā L220304 (2021).
  33. G.Ā FrancicaĀ andĀ L.Ā Dell’Anna,Ā arXiv: 2302.11680Ā  (2023).
  34. J.Ā RichterĀ andĀ A.Ā Pal,Ā Phys. Rev. Res.Ā 4,Ā L012003 (2022).
  35. O.Ā SalbergerĀ andĀ V.Ā Korepin,Ā arXiv: 1605.03842Ā  (2016).
  36. L.Ā ZadnikĀ andĀ M.Ā Fagotti,Ā SciPost Phys. CoreĀ 4,Ā 010 (2021).
  37. L.Ā Zadnik, K.Ā Bidzhiev,Ā andĀ M.Ā Fagotti,Ā SciPost Phys.Ā 10,Ā 099 (2021).
  38. F.Ā SuginoĀ andĀ V.Ā Korepin,Ā Int. J. Mod. Phys. BĀ 32,Ā 1850306 (2018).
  39. L.Ā Causer, J.Ā P.Ā Garrahan,Ā andĀ A.Ā Lamacraft,Ā Phys. Rev. EĀ 106,Ā 014128 (2022).
  40. Z.Ā ZhangĀ andĀ I.Ā Klich,Ā J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.Ā 50,Ā 425201 (2017).
  41. S.Ā N.Ā MajumdarĀ andĀ A.Ā Comtet,Ā J. Stat. Phys.Ā 119,Ā 777 (2005).
  42. S.Ā Papanikolaou, E.Ā Luijten,Ā andĀ E.Ā Fradkin,Ā Phys. Rev. BĀ 76,Ā 134514 (2007).
  43. R.Ā Movassagh,Ā Ann. Math. Sci. Appl.Ā 3,Ā 531 (2018).
  44. T.Ā UdagawaĀ andĀ H.Ā Katsura,Ā J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.Ā 50,Ā 405002 (2017).
  45. A.Ā Bastianello, U.Ā Borla,Ā andĀ S.Ā Moroz,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 128,Ā 196601 (2022).
  46. L.Ā ZadnikĀ andĀ J.Ā P.Ā Garrahan,Ā arXiv: 2304.10394Ā  (2023).
  47. S.Ā MoudgalyaĀ andĀ O.Ā I.Ā Motrunich,Ā Phys. Rev. XĀ 12,Ā 011050 (2022).
  48. The states |š’®1⟩ketsubscriptš’®1\mathinner{|{{\mathcal{S}}_{1}}\rangle}| caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ and |š’®N/2⟩ketsubscriptš’®š‘2\mathinner{|{{\mathcal{S}}_{N/2}}\rangle}| caligraphic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ are not strictly scars, as they correspond to the extreme eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. Since they are at the edge of the spectrum, they also show ā€œthermalā€ values for local observables. We nevertheless include them in the sequence of scarred states as they fit into the same spatial pattern.
  49. S.Ā R.Ā White,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 69,Ā 2863 (1992).
  50. M. C. Bañuls, D. A. Huse, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 101, 144305 (2020).
  51. An alternative approach for estimating scarred states with MPS worth mentioning is Ref.Ā [92], which uses a shift-invert like method to estimate eigenstates at a particular energy.
  52. V.Ā Khemani, F.Ā Pollmann,Ā andĀ S.Ā L.Ā Sondhi,Ā Phys. Rev. Lett.Ā 116,Ā 247204 (2016).
Citations (1)

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.