Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On the study of new proxies for second order cumulants of conserved charges in heavy-ion collisions with EPOS4

Published 4 Mar 2024 in hep-ph and nucl-th | (2403.02306v1)

Abstract: Proxies for cumulants of baryon number $B$, electric charge $Q$ and strangeness $S$ are usually measured in heavy-ion collisions via moments of net-number distribution of given hadronic species. Since these cumulants of conserved charges are expected to be sensitive to the existence of a critical point in the phase diagram of nuclear matter, it is crucial to ensure that the proxies used as substitutes are as close to them as possible. Hence, we use the EPOS4 framework to generate Au+Au collisions at several collision energies of the RHIC Beam Energy Scan. We compute $2\text{nd}$ order net-cumulants of $\pi$, $K$ and $p$, for which experimental data has been published, as well as the corresponding conserved charge cumulants. We then compare them with proxies, defined in previous lattice QCD and Hadron Resonance Gas model studies, which are shown to reproduce more accurately their associated conserved charge cumulants. We investigate the impact of hadronic re-scatterings occurring in the late evolution of the system on these quantities, as well as the amount of signal actually originating from the bulk medium which endures a phase transition.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS), Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The Perspective from the BRAHMS experiment, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 1 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410020 .
  2. B. B. Back et al. (PHOBOS), The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 28 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410022 .
  3. J. Adams et al. (STAR), Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 102 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009 .
  4. K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX), Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410003 .
  5. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019), arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat] .
  6. T. Niida and Y. Miake, Signatures of QGP at RHIC and the LHC, AAPPS Bull. 31, 12 (2021), arXiv:2104.11406 [nucl-ex] .
  7. C. S. Fischer, QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 105, 1 (2019), arXiv:1810.12938 [hep-ph] .
  8. D. Fuseau, T. Steinert, and J. Aichelin, Phase diagram of the Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio approach for finite chemical potentials, Phys. Rev. C 101, 065203 (2020), arXiv:1908.08122 [hep-ph] .
  9. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph] .
  10. D. Tlusty, The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Phase II: Physics and Upgrades, in 13th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics (2018) arXiv:1810.04767 [nucl-ex] .
  11. K. C. Meehan (STAR), Fixed Target Collisions at STAR, Nucl. Phys. A 956, 878 (2016).
  12. X. Luo and N. Xu, Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017), arXiv:1701.02105 [nucl-ex] .
  13. M. Stephanov, Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 032301 (2009), arXiv:0809.3450 [hep-ph] .
  14. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Collision Energy Dependence of Moments of Net-Kaon Multiplicity Distributions at RHIC, Phys. Lett. B 785, 551 (2018), arXiv:1709.00773 [nucl-ex] .
  15. M. Bluhm et al., Dynamics of critical fluctuations: Theory – phenomenology – heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 1003, 122016 (2020), arXiv:2001.08831 [nucl-th] .
  16. V. Koch, A. Majumder, and J. Randrup, Baryon-strangeness correlations: A Diagnostic of strongly interacting matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 182301 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0505052 .
  17. K. Werner, Revealing a deep connection between factorization and saturation: New insight into modeling high-energy proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus scattering in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064903 (2023a), arXiv:2301.12517 [hep-ph] .
  18. N. R. Sahoo, S. De, and T. K. Nayak, Baseline study for higher moments of net-charge distributions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044906 (2013), arXiv:1210.7206 [nucl-ex] .
  19. V. Vovchenko and V. Koch, Efficiency corrections for factorial moments and cumulants of overlapping sets of particles, Nucl. Phys. A 1010, 122179 (2021), arXiv:2101.02182 [nucl-th] .
  20. P. Alba et al., Constraining the hadronic spectrum through QCD thermodynamics on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034517 (2017), arXiv:1702.01113 [hep-lat] .
  21. M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR), Disappearance of partonic collectivity in sNN=3GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC, Phys. Lett. B 827, 137003 (2022), arXiv:2108.00908 [nucl-ex] .
  22. M. Kitazawa and M. Asakawa, Revealing baryon number fluctuations from proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85, 021901 (2012a), arXiv:1107.2755 [nucl-th] .
  23. M. Kitazawa and M. Asakawa, Relation between baryon number fluctuations and experimentally observed proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024904 (2012b), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 86, 069902 (2012)], arXiv:1205.3292 [nucl-th] .
  24. J. Adam et al. (STAR), Beam energy dependence of net- ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ fluctuations measured by the STAR experiment at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C 102, 024903 (2020), arXiv:2001.06419 [nucl-ex] .
  25. J. M. Campbell et al., Event Generators for High-Energy Physics Experiments, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2203.11110 [hep-ph] .
  26. https://klaus.pages.in2p3.fr/epos4/.
  27. K. Werner and B. Guiot, Perturbative QCD concerning light and heavy flavor in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034904 (2023), arXiv:2306.02396 [hep-ph] .
  28. K. Werner, Core-corona separation in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 152301 (2007), arXiv:0704.1270 [nucl-th] .
  29. K. Werner, Core-corona procedure and microcanonical hadronization to understand strangeness enhancement in proton-proton and heavy ion collisions in the EPOS4 framework, Phys. Rev. C 109, 014910 (2024), arXiv:2306.10277 [hep-ph] .
  30. I. Karpenko, P. Huovinen, and M. Bleicher, A 3+1 dimensional viscous hydrodynamic code for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 3016 (2014), arXiv:1312.4160 [nucl-th] .
  31. M. Bleicher et al., Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model, J. Phys. G25, 1859 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9909407 [hep-ph] .
  32. M. Stephanov and Y. Yin, Hydrodynamics with parametric slowing down and fluctuations near the critical point, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036006 (2018), arXiv:1712.10305 [nucl-th] .
  33. J. Jahan, The Beam Energy Scan under the scope of EPOS 4, PhD Thesis, Nantes Université (2022).
  34. R. Kumar et al. (MUSES), Theoretical and Experimental Constraints for the Equation of State of Dense and Hot Matter,   (2023), arXiv:2303.17021 [nucl-th] .
  35. H. Wolter et al. (TMEP), Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103962 (2022), arXiv:2202.06672 [nucl-th] .
  36. A. Sorensen and V. Koch, Phase transitions and critical behavior in hadronic transport with a relativistic density functional equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 104, 034904 (2021), arXiv:2011.06635 [nucl-th] .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 26 likes about this paper.