Large spin shuttling oscillations enabling high-fidelity single qubit gates
Abstract: Semiconductor quantum dots have shown impressive breakthroughs in the last years, with single and two qubit gate fidelities matching other leading platforms and scalability still remaining a relative strength. However, due to qubit wiring considerations, mobile electron architectures have been proposed to facilitate upward scaling. In this work, we examine and demonstrate the possibility of significantly outperforming static EDSR-type single-qubit pulsing by taking advantage of the larger spatial mobility to achieve larger Rabi frequencies and reduce the effect of charge noise. Our theoretical results indicate that fidelities are ultimately bottlenecked by spin-valley physics, which can be suppressed through the use of quantum optimal control, and we demonstrate that, across different potential regimes and competing physical models, shuttling based single-qubit gates retain significant advantage over existing alternatives.
- D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Physical Review A 57, 120 (1998).
- B. Klemt, V. El-Homsy, M. Nurizzo, P. Hamonic, B. Martinez, B. C. Paz, C. spence, M. Dartiailh, B. Jadot, E. Chanrion, V. Thiney, R. Lethiecq, B. Bertrand, H. Niebojewski, C. Bäuerle, M. Vinet, Y.-M. Niquet, T. Meunier, and M. Urdampilleta, “Electrical manipulation of a single electron spin in CMOS with micromagnet and spin-valley coupling,” (2023), arxiv:2303.04960 [cond-mat] .
- R. Neumann and L. R. Schreiber, Journal of Applied Physics 117, 193903 (2015).
- M. Künne, A. Willmes, M. Oberländer, C. Gorjaew, J. D. Teske, H. Bhardwaj, M. Beer, E. Kammerloher, R. Otten, I. Seidler, R. Xue, L. R. Schreiber, and H. Bluhm, “The SpinBus Architecture: Scaling Spin Qubits with Electron Shuttling,” (2023), arxiv:2306.16348 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] .
- R. Xue, M. Beer, I. Seidler, S. Humpohl, J.-S. Tu, S. Trellenkamp, T. Struck, H. Bluhm, and L. R. Schreiber, “Si/SiGe QuBus for single electron information-processing devices with memory and micron-scale connectivity function,” (2023), arxiv:2306.16375 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] .
- T. Struck, M. Volmer, L. Visser, T. Offermann, R. Xue, J.-S. Tu, S. Trellenkamp, Ł. Cywiński, H. Bluhm, and L. R. Schreiber, “Spin-EPR-pair separation by conveyor-mode single electron shuttling in Si/SiGe,” (2023), arxiv:2307.04897 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph] .
- M. J. Rančić and G. Burkard, Physical Review B 93, 205433 (2016).
- James Bradbury and Roy Frostig and Peter Hawkins and Matthew James Johnson and Chris Leary and Dougal Maclaurin and George Necula and Adam Paszke and Jake VanderPlas and Skye Wanderman-Milne and Qiao Zhang, “JAX: Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs,” (2018).
- M. A. Nielsen, Physics Letters A 303, 249 (2002).
- R. Garnett, Bayesian Optimization (Cambridge University Press, 2023).
- T. Head, M. Kumar, H. Nahrstaedt, G. Louppe, and I. Shcherbatyi, “Scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize,” Zenodo (2021).
- L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Physical Review A 58, 2733 (1998), arxiv:quant-ph/9803057 .
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.