Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Observational constrained Weyl type $f(Q,T)$ gravity cosmological model and the dynamical system analysis

Published 29 Feb 2024 in gr-qc and hep-th | (2402.18915v1)

Abstract: Using the cosmological date sets, the cosmological parameters are constrained in this paper, with some well known form of Hubble parameter. To understand the dynamics of the Weyl type $f(Q,T)$, functional form $f(Q,T)$ has been introduced, where $Q$ and $T$ respectively represents the nonmetricity scalar and trace of energy-momentum tensor. Using the constrained values of the parameters, the other geometrical parameters are analysed and the accelerating behaviour has been shown. Further to get the complete evolutionary behaviour of the Universe, the dynamical system analysis has been performed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. S. F. Daniel, R. R. Caldwell, A. Cooray, and A. Melchiorri, “Large scale structure as a probe of gravitational slip,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) no. 12, 103513, arXiv:0802.1068.
  2. M. M. Phillips, “The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae,” ApJL 413 (1993) no. -, L105.
  3. Y. Fujii, “Origin of the gravitational constant and particle masses in a scale-invariant scalar-tensor theory,” Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) no. 0, 2580–2588.
  4. J. M. Nester and H.-J. Yo, “Symmetric teleparallel general relativity,” arXiv:gr-qc/9809049 (1999) .
  5. J. B. Jiménez, L. Heisenberg, and T. Koivisto, “Coincident general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no. 6, 044048, arXiv:1710.03116.
  6. F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos, and E. N. Saridakis, “First evidence that non-metricity f⁢(Q)𝑓𝑄f(Q)italic_f ( italic_Q ) gravity could challenge ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM,” Physics Letters B 822 (2021) 136634, arXiv:2104.15123.
  7. R. Lazkoz, F. S. N. Lobo, M. Ortiz-Baños, and V. Salzano, “Observational constraints of f⁢(Q)𝑓𝑄f(Q)italic_f ( italic_Q ) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 104027, arXiv:1907.13219.
  8. S. Capozziello and R. DAgostino, “Model−--independent reconstruction of f⁢(Q)𝑓𝑄f(Q)italic_f ( italic_Q ) non−--metric gravity,” Physics Letters B 832 (2022) no. -, 137229, arXiv:2204.01015.
  9. W. Khyllep, A. Paliathanasis, and J. Dutta, “Cosmological solutions and growth index of matter perturbations in f⁢(Q)𝑓𝑄f(Q)italic_f ( italic_Q ) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no. 15, 103521, arXiv:2103.08372.
  10. A. Paliathanasis, “Dynamical analysis of f(Q) cosmology,” Physics of the Dark Universe 41 (2023) no. -, 101255, arXiv:2304.04219v2.
  11. S. A. Narawade and B. Mishra, “Phantom Cosmological Model with Observational Constraints in f(Q) Gravity,” Annalen der Physik 535 (2023) no. -, 2200626, arXiv:2211.09701.
  12. Y. Xu, G. Li, T. Harko, and S.-D. Liang, “f(Q, T) gravity,” The European Physical Journal C 79 (2019) no. 8, 708, arXiv:1908.04760.
  13. A. Nájera and A. Fajardo, “Fitting f(Q,T) gravity models with a ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM limit using H(z) and Pantheon data,” Physics of the Dark Universe 34 (2021) no. -, 100889, arXiv:2104.14065.
  14. A. Nájera and A. Fajardo, “Cosmological perturbation theory in f(Q,T) gravity,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (2022) no. 03, 020, arXiv:2111.04205.
  15. S. Narawade, M. Koussour, and B. Mishra, “Constrained f(Q,T) gravity accelerating cosmological model and its dynamical system analysis,” Nuclear Physics B 992 (2023) no. -, 116233, arXiv:2305.08145.
  16. R. Bhagat, S. Narawade, B. Mishra, and S. Tripathy, “Constrained cosmological model in f(Q,T) gravity with non-linear non-metricity,” Physics of the Dark Universe 42 (2023) no. -, 101358, arXiv:2308.11190.
  17. Y. Xu, T. Harko, S. Shahidi, and S.-D. Liang, “Weyl type f(Q, T) gravity, and its cosmological implications,” The European Physical Journal C 80 (2020) no. 5, 708, arXiv:2005.04025.
  18. R. Bhagat, S. Narawade, and B. Mishra, “Weyl type f(Q,T) gravity observational constrained cosmological models,” Physics of the Dark Universe 41 (2023) 101250, arXiv:2305.01659.
  19. J.-Z. Yang, S. Shahidi, T. Harko, and S.-D. Liang, “Geodesic deviation, Raychaudhuri equation, Newtonian limit, and tidal forces in Weyl-type f(Q, T) gravity,” The European Physical Journal C 81 (2021) no. 2, 111, arXiv:2101.09956.
  20. M. Koussour, “A model-independent method with phantom divide line crossing in Weyl-type f(Q, T) gravity,” Chinese Journal of Physics 83 (2023) no. -, 454–466, arXiv:2303.00665v1.
  21. V. Sahni, T. Saini, A. Starobinsky, and U. Alam, “Statefinder–A new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy,” JETP Letters 77 (2003) no. 5, 201 – 206, arXiv:astro-ph/0201498.
  22. R. Jimenez and A. Loeb, “Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on Relative Galaxy Ages,” The Astrophysical Journal 573 (2002) no. 1, 37, arXiv:astro-ph/0106145.
  23. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, “emcee: The MCMC Hammer,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125 (2013) no. 925, 306, arXiv:1202.3665.
  24. A. Agrawal, B. Mishra, and S. Tripathy, “Observationally constrained accelerating cosmological model with higher power of non-metricity and squared trace,” Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 38 (2023) no. -, 41–48, arXiv:2206.06601.
  25. J. Soltis, S. Casertano, and A. G. Riess, “The Parallax of ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω Centauri Measured from Gaia EDR3 and a Direct, Geometric Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch and the Hubble Constant,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 908 (2021) no. 1, L5, arXiv:2012.09196.
  26. W. L. Freedman, “Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective*,” The Astrophysical Journal 919 (2021) no. 1, 16, arXiv:2106.15656v1.
  27. S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. Odintsov, “The role of energy conditions in f⁢(R)𝑓𝑅f(R)italic_f ( italic_R ) cosmology,” Physics Letters B 781 (2018) no. -, 99–106, arXiv:1803.08815v1.
  28. C. G. Böhmer and N. Chan, “Dynamical Systems in Cosmology,” Dynamical and Complex Systems - (2017) no. -, 121–156, arXiv:1409.5585v2.
  29. S. Bahamonde, M. Marciu, and P. Rudra, “Dynamical system analysis of generalized energy-momentum-squared gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no. 8, 083511, arXiv:1906.00027 [gr-qc].
  30. S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, “Dynamical systems perspective of cosmological finite-time singularities in f⁢(R)𝑓𝑅f\mathbf{(}R\mathbf{)}italic_f ( italic_R ) gravity and interacting multifluid cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no. 25, 024013, arXiv:1806.07295v1.
  31. L. Pati, S. A. Narawade, S. K. Tripathy, and B. Mishra, “Evolutionary behaviour of cosmological parameters with dynamical system analysis in f(Q, T) gravity,” The European Physical Journal C 83 (2023) no. 5, 445, arXiv:2206.11928.
  32. S. A. Kadam, B. Mishra, and J. Said Levi, “Teleparallel scalar-tensor gravity through cosmological dynamical systems,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no. 8, 680, arXiv:2205.04231 [gr-qc].
  33. A. A. Coley, “Dynamical systems in cosmology,” in Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERE 99). 9, 1999. arXiv:gr-qc/9910074.
  34. B. Aulbach, “Continuous and discrete dynamics near manifolds of equilibria,” Lecture notes in mathematics 1058 (1984) .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Authors (2)

  1. Rahul Bhagat 
  2. B. Mishra 

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 4 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free