Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Subspace Scar Time-Crystallinity in Driven Homogeneous Central-Spin Models
Abstract: We study the stroboscopic non-equilibrium quantum dynamics of periodically kicked Hamiltonians involving homogeneous central-spin interactions. The system exhibits a strong fragmentation of Hilbert space into four-dimensional Floquet-Krylov subspaces, which oscillate between two disjointed two-dimensional subspaces and thus break the discrete time-translation symmetry of the system. Our analytical and numerical analyses reveal that fully polarized states of the satellite spins exhibit fragmentations that are stable against perturbations and have high overlap with Floquet eigenstates of atypically low bipartite entanglement entropy (scar states). Motivated by the breaking of discrete time translation symmetry by Floquet-Krylov subspaces, we introduce a novel type of time crystal that we call a ``subspace time crystal''. We present evidence of robust time-crystalline behavior in the form of a period doubling of the total magnetization of fully polarized satellite spin states that persists over long time scales. We compute non-equilibrium phase diagrams with respect to a magnetic field, coupling terms, and pulse error for various interaction types, including Heisenberg, Ising, XXZ, and XX. We also discuss possible experimental realizations of scar time crystals in color center, quantum dot, and rare-earth ion platforms.
- D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Physical review letters 117, 090402 (2016).
- V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. Sondhi, arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10745 (2019).
- H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Physical review letters 114, 251603 (2015).
- Broadly, ergodicity refers to the phenomenon where the time average of the expectation value of an observable is equal to the ensemble (density matrix) average.
- H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Physical Review E 90, 052105 (2014).
- V. Alba, Physical Review B 91, 155123 (2015).
- J. M. Deutsch, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 082001 (2018).
- A. Pal and D. A. Huse, Physical review b 82, 174411 (2010).
- R. Vosk, D. A. Huse, and E. Altman, Physical Review X 5, 031032 (2015).
- S. Bocini and M. Fagotti, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.15585 (2022).
- K. Mizuta, K. Takasan, and N. Kawakami, Physical Review Research 2, 033284 (2020).
- S. Sugiura, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Physical Review Research 3, L012010 (2021).
- B. Bhattacharjee, S. Sur, and P. Nandy, Physical Review B 106, 205150 (2022).
- B. Windt and H. Pichler, Physical Review Letters 128, 090606 (2022).
- S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 102, 085140 (2020).
- Q. Hummel, K. Richter, and P. Schlagheck, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12046 (2022).
- S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011050 (2022).
- V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174204 (2020).
- E. Barnes, J. M. Nichol, and S. E. Economou, Phys. Rev. B 99, 035311 (2019).
- E. Takou, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011004 (2023).
- M. Wampler and I. Klich, Phys. Rev. B 108, 104315 (2023).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.