Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 439 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Mixed Strategy Constraints in Continuous Games (2402.17874v2)

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: When modeling robot interactions as Nash equilibrium problems, it is desirable to place coupled constraints which restrict these interactions to be safe and acceptable (for instance, to avoid collisions). Such games are continuous with potential mixed strategy equilibria, and this combination of characteristics means special care must be given to setting coupled constraints in a way that respects mixed strategies while remaining compatible with continuous game solution methods. Here, we investigate the problem of constraint-setting in this context, primarily focusing on a chance-based method. We first motivate these chance constraints in a discrete setting, placing them on n-player matrix games as a justifiable approach to handling the probabilistic nature of mixing. Then, we describe a numerical solution method for these chance constrained, continuous games with simultaneous pure strategy optimization. Finally, using a modified pursuit-evasion game as a motivating example, we demonstrate the actual behavior of this solution method in terms of its fidelity, parameter sensitivity, and efficiency

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Qin Ba and Jong-Shi Pang. 2022. Exact penalization of generalized Nash equilibrium problems. Operations Research 70, 3 (2022), 1448–1464.
  2. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM review 59, 1 (2017), 65–98.
  3. Abraham Charnes and William W Cooper. 1959. Chance-constrained programming. Management science 6, 1 (1959), 73–79.
  4. Steven P Dirkse and Michael C Ferris. 1995. The path solver: a nommonotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optimization methods and software 5, 2 (1995), 123–156.
  5. Christophe Dutang. 2013. Existence theorems for generalized Nash equilibrium problems: An analysis of assumptions. HAL Open Science (2013).
  6. Francisco Facchinei and Christian Kanzow. 2010a. Generalized Nash equilibrium problems. Annals of Operations Research 175, 1 (2010), 177–211.
  7. Francisco Facchinei and Christian Kanzow. 2010b. Penalty methods for the solution of generalized Nash equilibrium problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization 20, 5 (2010), 2228–2253.
  8. Advances and applications of chance-constrained approaches to systems optimisation under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science 44, 7 (2013), 1209–1232.
  9. Sample-based approximation of Nash in large many-player games via gradient descent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01285 (2021).
  10. Patrick T. Harker. 1991. Generalized Nash games and quasi-variational inequalities. European Journal of Operational Research 54, 1 (1991), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90325-P
  11. René Henrion and Cyrille Strugarek. 2008. Convexity of chance constraints with independent random variables. Computational Optimization and Applications 41, 2 (2008), 263–276.
  12. Zheng-Hai Huang and Liqun Qi. 2017. Formulating an n-person noncooperative game as a tensor complementarity problem. Computational Optimization and Applications 66 (2017), 557–576.
  13. Christian Kanzow and Daniel Steck. 2016. Augmented Lagrangian methods for the solution of generalized Nash equilibrium problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization 26, 4 (2016), 2034–2058.
  14. Jacek Krawczyk. 2007. Numerical solutions to coupled-constraint (or generalised Nash) equilibrium problems. Computational Management Science 4 (2007), 183–204.
  15. Turbocharging solution concepts: Solving NEs, CEs and CCEs with neural equilibrium solvers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 5586–5600.
  16. SP Mukherjee. 1980. Mixed strategies in chance-constrained programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society 31, 11 (1980), 1045–1047.
  17. Parametrized variational inequality approaches to generalized Nash equilibrium problems with shared constraints. Computational Optimization and Applications 48, 3 (2011), 423–452.
  18. Christos H Papadimitriou and Tim Roughgarden. 2005. Computing equilibria in multi-player games.. In SODA, Vol. 5. Citeseer, 82–91.
  19. Learning mixed strategies in trajectory games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00291 (2022).
  20. Matthew Rabin. 1993. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American economic review (1993), 1281–1302.
  21. On the solution of affine generalized Nash equilibrium problems with shared constraints by Lemke’s method. Mathematical Programming 142, 1-2 (2013), 1–46.
  22. Vikas Vikram Singh and Abdel Lisser. 2018. Variational inequality formulation for the games with random payoffs. Journal of Global Optimization 72 (2018), 743–760.
  23. Separable and low-rank continuous games. International Journal of Game Theory 37, 4 (2008), 475–504.
  24. Anna von Heusinger. 2009. Numerical methods for the solution of the generalized Nash equilibrium problem. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universität Würzburg.
  25. Jonathan Widger and Daniel Grosu. 2009. Parallel computation of nash equilibria in n-player games. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 1. IEEE, 209–215.
  26. Variational Inequality for n-Player Strategic Chance-Constrained Games. SN Computer Science 4, 1 (2022), 82.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.