Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Ghost-gluon vertex in the presence of the Gribov horizon: General kinematics

Published 27 Feb 2024 in hep-ph, hep-lat, and hep-th | (2402.17534v2)

Abstract: Correlation functions are important probes for the behavior of quantum field theories. Already at tree-level, the Refined Gribov Zwanziger (RGZ) effective action for Yang-Mills theories provides a good approximation for the gluon propagator, as compared to that calculated by nonperturbative methods such as Lattice Field Theory and Dyson-Schwinger Equations. However, the study of higher correlation functions of the RGZ theory is still at its beginning. In this work we evaluate the ghost-antighost-gluon vertex function in Landau gauge at one-loop level, in $d=4$ space-time dimensions for the gauge groups SU(2) and SU(3). More precisely, we extend the analysis conducted in [1] for the soft-gluon limit to an arbitrary kinematic configuration. We introduce renormalization group effects by means of a toy model for the running coupling and investigate the impact of such a model in the ultraviolet tails of our results. We find that RGZ results match fairly closely those from lattice simulations, Schwinger-Dyson equations and the Curci-Ferrari model for three different kinematic configurations. This is compatible with RGZ being a feasible theory for the strong interaction in the infrared regime.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Z. Fodor and C. Hoelbling, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 449 (2012), arXiv:1203.4789 [hep-lat] .
  2. S. Durr et al. (BMW), Science 322, 1224 (2008), arXiv:0906.3599 [hep-lat] .
  3. S. Borsanyi et al., Nature 593, 51 (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 [hep-lat] .
  4. S. Borsanyi et al. (BMW), Science 347, 1452 (2015), arXiv:1406.4088 [hep-lat] .
  5. C. S. Fischer and M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094005 (2020), arXiv:2007.11505 [hep-ph] .
  6. M. Q. Huber, Phys. Rev. D 101, 114009 (2020), arXiv:2003.13703 [hep-ph] .
  7. J. M. Pawlowski, Annals Phys. 322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0512261 [hep-th] .
  8. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  9. S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  10. M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy, Nuovo Cim. 16, 705 (1960).
  11. K. Fukushima, Physics Letters B 591, 277 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310121 .
  12. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D 82, 101701 (2010), arXiv:1004.1607 [hep-ph] .
  13. M. Tissier and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. D84, 045018 (2011), arXiv:1105.2475 [hep-th] .
  14. F. Figueroa and M. Peláez, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094005 (2022), arXiv:2110.09561 [hep-th] .
  15. F. Siringo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016009 (2023), arXiv:2211.06448 [hep-ph] .
  16. F. Siringo and G. Comitini, Phys. Rev. D 107, 096001 (2023), arXiv:2210.11541 [hep-th] .
  17. G. Comitini and F. Siringo, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094002 (2020), arXiv:2007.04231 [hep-ph] .
  18. F. Siringo and G. Comitini, Phys. Rev. D 98, 034023 (2018), arXiv:1806.08397 [hep-ph] .
  19. V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978).
  20. D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989).
  21. N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rept. 520, 175 (2012), arXiv:1202.1491 [hep-th] .
  22. N. Vandersickel, A Study of the Gribov-Zwanziger action: from propagators to glueballs, Ph.D. thesis, Gent U. (2011), arXiv:1104.1315 [hep-th] .
  23. R. F. Sobreiro and S. P. Sorella, in 13th Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School on Particle and Fields (2005) arXiv:hep-th/0504095 .
  24. J. A. Gracey, Phys. Rev. D86, 105029 (2012), arXiv:1210.5962 [hep-th] .
  25. M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Phys. Rept. 279, 1 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9509344 [hep-ph] .
  26. O. Piguet and S. P. Sorella, Lect. Notes Phys. Monogr. 28, 1 (1995).
  27. J. C. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B 33, 436 (1971).
  28. M. Sjödahl, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2310 (2013), arXiv:1211.2099 [hep-ph] .
  29. G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 151 (1979).
  30. A. V. Smirnov and F. S. Chuharev, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106877 (2020), arXiv:1901.07808 [hep-ph] .
  31. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 68, 075002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307101 .
  32. O. Oliveira and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D86, 114513 (2012), arXiv:1207.3029 [hep-lat] .
  33. A. Maas, SciPost Phys. 8, 071 (2020), arXiv:1907.10435 [hep-lat] .
  34. A. Rohatg, “Webplotdigitizer (version 4.3, july 2020),” https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 2 likes about this paper.