Microscopic optical potential from the relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory: Proton-nucleus scattering
Abstract: A relativistic microscopic optical model potential for nucleon-nucleus scattering is developed based on the \emph{ab initio} relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (RBHF) theory with the improved local density approximation, which is abbreviated as the RBOM potential. Both real and imaginary parts of the single-particle potentials in symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter at various densities are determined uniquely in the full Dirac space. The density distributions of the target nuclei are calculated by the covariant energy density functional theory with the density functional PC-PK1. The central and spin-orbit terms of the optical potentials are quantitatively consistent with the relativistic phenomenological optical potentials. The performance of the RBOM potential is evaluated by considering proton scattering with incident energy MeV on five target nuclei, $\prescript{208}{}{\text{Pb}}$, $\prescript{120}{}{\text{Sn}}$, $\prescript{90}{}{\text{Zr}}$, $\prescript{48}{}{\text{Ca}}$, and $\prescript{40}{}{\text{Ca}}$. Scattering observables including the elastic scattering angular distributions, analyzing powers, spin rotation functions, and reaction cross sections are analyzed. Theoretical predictions show good agreements with the experimental data and the results derived from phenomenological optical potentials. We anticipate that the RBOM potential can provide reference for other phenomenological and microscopic optical model potentials, as well as reliable descriptions for nucleon scattering on exotic nuclei in the era of rare-isotope beams.
- H. Schatz, Physics Today 61, 40 (2008).
- H. Sakaguchi and J. Zenihiro, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 97, 1 (2017).
- .
- W. Dickhoff and R. Charity, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 105, 252 (2019).
- J. Rotureau, Frontiers in Physics 8, 285 (2020).
- J. W. Holt and T. R. Whitehead, “Modern Approaches to Optical Potentials,” in Handbook of Nuclear Physics, edited by I. Tanihata, H. Toki, and T. Kajino (2022) pp. 1–30, arXiv:2201.13404 [nucl-th] .
- A. Koning and J. Delaroche, Nuclear Physics A 713, 231 (2003).
- L. Arnold and B. Clark, Physics Letters B 84, 46 (1979).
- R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989).
- R. Machleidt and D. Entem, Physics Reports 503, 1 (2011).
- S. Quaglioni and P. Navrátil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 092501 (2008).
- G. Hagen and N. Michel, Phys. Rev. C 86, 021602 (2012).
- J. S. Bell and E. J. Squires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 96 (1959).
- G. Li and Y. Zhuo, Nuclear Physics A 568, 745 (1994).
- R. Brockmann and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 42, 1965 (1990).
- B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1 (1986).
- P. Poschenrieder and M. K. Weigel, Physical Review C 38, 471 (1988).
- D. Alonso and F. Sammarruca, Phys. Rev. C 67, 054301 (2003).
- M. Baldo and C. Maieron, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 34, R243 (2007).
- H. Arellano and G. Blanchon, Computer Physics Communications 259, 107543 (2021).
- C. J. Horowitz, D. P. Murdock, and B. D. Serot, “The relativistic impulse approximation,” in Computational Nuclear Physics 1: Nuclear Structure, edited by K. Langanke, J. A. Maruhn, and S. E. Koonin (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991) pp. 129–151.
- E. Cooper and B. Jennings, Nuclear Physics A 483, 601 (1988).
- S. Hilaire and M. Girod, The European Physical Journal A 33, 237 (2007).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.