Optimizing Base Placement of Surgical Robot: Kinematics Data-Driven Approach by Analyzing Working Pattern
Abstract: In robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS), optimal placement of the surgical robot base is crucial for successful surgery. Improper placement can hinder performance because of manipulator limitations and inaccessible workspaces. Conventional base placement relies on the experience of trained medical staff. This study proposes a novel method for determining the optimal base pose based on the surgeon's working pattern. The proposed method analyzes recorded end-effector poses using a machine learning-based clustering technique to identify key positions and orientations preferred by the surgeon. We introduce two scoring metrics to address the joint limit and singularity issues: joint margin and manipulability scores. We then train a multi-layer perceptron regressor to predict the optimal base pose based on these scores. Evaluation in a simulated environment using the da Vinci Research Kit shows unique base pose score maps for four volunteers, highlighting the individuality of the working patterns. Results comparing with 20,000 randomly selected base poses suggest that the score obtained using the proposed method is 28.2% higher than that obtained by random base placement. These results emphasize the need for operator-specific optimization during base placement in RAMIS.
- C. Chang, Z. Steinberg, A. Shah, and M. S. Gundeti, “Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery,” Journal of endourology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 631–638, 2014.
- E. Rajih, C. Tholomier, B. Cormier, V. Samouëlian, T. Warkus, M. Liberman, H. Widmer, J.-B. Lattouf, A. M. Alenizi, M. Meskawi et al., “Error reporting from the da vinci surgical system in robotic surgery: A canadian multispecialty experience at a single academic centre,” Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, p. E197, 2017.
- A. Trejos, R. Patel, I. Ross, and B. Kiaii, “Optimizing port placement for robot-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 355–364, 2007.
- J. L. Martin, B. J. Norris, E. Murphy, and J. A. Crowe, “Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics,” Applied ergonomics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 271–283, 2008.
- Y. Gao, S. S. Vedula, C. E. Reiley, N. Ahmidi, B. Varadarajan, H. C. Lin, L. Tao, L. Zappella, B. Béjar, D. D. Yuh, C. C. G. Chen, R. Vidal, S. Khudanpur, and G. Hager, “The jhu-isi gesture and skill assessment working set (jigsaws): A surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling,” In Modeling and Monitoring of Computer Assisted Interventions (M2CAI) – MICCAI Workshop, 2014.
- A. L. Trejos and R. V. Patel, “Port placement for endoscopic cardiac surgery based on robot dexterity optimization,” in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2005, pp. 912–917.
- L. W. Sun and C. K. Yeung, “Port placement and pose selection of the da vinci surgical system for collision-free intervention based on performance optimization,” in 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2007, pp. 1951–1956.
- M. Feng, X. Jin, W. Tong, X. Guo, J. Zhao, and Y. Fu, “Pose optimization and port placement for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in cholecystectomy,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 13, 2017.
- A. M. Sundaram, N. Budjakoski, J. Klodmann, and M. A. Roa, “Task-specific robot base pose optimization for robot-assisted surgeries,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 9, 2022.
- I. Papanikolaidi, A. Synodinos, V. Moulianitis, N. Aspragathos, and E. Xidias, “Optimal base placement of the da vinci system based on the manipulability index,” Proc. 22nd Conf. International Workshop on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region, 2013.
- M. Xu, J. Di, N. Das, and M. C. Yip, “Optimal multi-manipulator arm placement for maximal dexterity during robotics surgery,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 9752–9758, 2021.
- M. R. Maddah, J.-M. Classe, I. Jaffre, K. A. Watson, K. S. Lin, D. Chablat, C. Dumas, and C. G. Cao, “A decision aid for the port placement problem in robot-assisted hysterectomy,” Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 43–56, 2023.
- S. Raschka, “Model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1811.12808, 2018.
- P. J. Rousseeuw, “Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis,” Journal of computational and applied mathematics, vol. 20, pp. 53–65, 1987.
- M. Hwang, J. Ichnowski, B. Thananjeyan, D. Seita, S. Paradis, D. Fer, T. Low, and K. Goldberg, “Automating surgical peg transfer: Calibration with deep learning can exceed speed, accuracy, and consistency of humans,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 20, pp. 909–922, 2020.
- R. Tibshirani, “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267–288, 1966.
- H. Drucker, C. J. C. Burges, L. Kaufman, A. Smola, and V. N. Vapnik, “Support vector regression machines,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1996.
- H.-C. Hur, D. Arden, L. E. Dodge, B. Zheng, and H. A. Ricciotti, “Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: A surgical skills assessment tool in gynecology,” JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 15, pp. 21 – 26, 2011.
- M. Ferro, A. Mirante, F. Ficuciello, and M. Vendittelli, “A coppeliasim dynamic simulator for the da vinci research kit,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 129–136, 2023.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.