Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimizing single-photon quantum radar detection through partially postselected filtering

Published 25 Feb 2024 in quant-ph | (2402.16031v2)

Abstract: In this study, we explore an approach aimed at enhancing the transmission or reflection coefficients of absorbing materials through the utilization of joint measurements of entangled photon states. On the one hand, through the implementation of photon catalysis in the reflected channel, we can effectively modify the state of the transmission channel, leading to a notable improvement in the transmission ratio. Similarly, this approach holds potential for significantly amplifying the reflection ratio of absorbing materials, which is useful for detecting cooperative targets. On the other hand, employing statistical counting methods based on the technique of heralding on zero photons, we evaluate the influence of our reflection enhancement protocol for detecting noncooperative targets, which is validated through Monte Carlo simulations of a quantum radar setup affected by Gaussian white noise. Our results demonstrate a remarkable enhancement in the signal-to-noise ratio of imaging, albeit with an increase in mean-square error. These findings highlight the potential practical applications of our approach in the implementation of quantum radar.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. R. V. Pound, From radar to nuclear magnetic resonance, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S54 (1999).
  2. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  3. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantumenhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004).
  4. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
  5. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
  6. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  7. S. Lloyd, Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination, Science 321, 1463 (2008).
  8. J. F. S. Iii, Quantum entangled radar theory and a correction method for the effects of the atmosphere on entanglement, Proceedings of Spie the International Society for Optical Engineering 7342, 7342 (2019).
  9. L. Fan and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum illumination using non-gaussian states generated by photon subtraction and photon addition, Phys. Rev. A 98, 012319 (2018).
  10. E. Jung and D. Park, Quantum illumination with three-mode gaussian state, Quantum Information Processing 21, 71 (2022).
  11. S. Guha and B. I. Erkmen, Gaussian-state quantum-illumination receivers for target detection, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052310 (2009).
  12. A. Karsa, M. Ghalaii, and S. Pirandola, Noiseless linear amplification in quantum target detection using gaussian states, Quantum Science and Technology 7, 035026 (2022).
  13. Q. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, and J. H. Shapiro, Optimum mixed-state discrimination for noisy entanglement-enhanced sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040801 (2017a).
  14. M. Lanzagorta, Quantum radar cross sections, in Quantum Optics, Vol. 7727, edited by V. N. Zadkov and T. Durt, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2010) p. 77270K.
  15. Z. Tian, D. Wu, and T. Hu, Closed-form expressions and analysis for the slumping effect of a cuboid in the scattering characteristics of quantum radar, Opt. Express 29, 34077 (2021).
  16. C. Fang, The simulation and analysis of quantum radar cross section for three-dimensional convex targets, IEEE Photonics Journal 10, 1 (2018).
  17. S. Pirandola, Quantum reading of a classical digital memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090504 (2011).
  18. Q. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, and J. H. Shapiro, Entanglement-enhanced lidars for simultaneous range and velocity measurements, Phys. Rev. A 96, 040304 (2017b).
  19. Q. Zhuang and J. H. Shapiro, Ultimate accuracy limit of quantum pulse-compression ranging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010501 (2022).
  20. A. M. Zheltikov and M. O. Scully, Photon entanglement for life-science imaging: rethinking the limits of the possible, Physics-Uspekhi 63, 698 (2020).
  21. M. Lanzagorta, Amplification of radar and lidar signatures using quantum sensors, in Active and Passive Signatures IV, Vol. 8734, edited by G. C. Gilbreath and C. T. Hawley, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2013) p. 87340C.
  22. A. I. Lvovsky and J. Mlynek, Quantum-optical catalysis: Generating nonclassical states of light by means of linear optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 250401 (2002).
  23. X.-x. Xu, Enhancing quantum entanglement and quantum teleportation for two-mode squeezed vacuum state by local quantum-optical catalysis, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012318 (2015).
  24. S. Zhang and X. Zhang, Photon catalysis acting as noiseless linear amplification and its application in coherence enhancement, Phys. Rev. A 97, 043830 (2018).
  25. C. M. Nunn, J. D. Franson, and T. B. Pittman, Heralding on the detection of zero photons, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033717 (2021).
  26. D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations, Nature 402, 390 (1999).
  27. S. Das, S. Modak, and M. N. Bera, Saturating quantum advantages in postselected metrology with the positive kirkwood-dirac distribution, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042413 (2023).
  28. P. A. M. Dirac, On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195 (1945).
  29. J. G. Kirkwood, Quantum statistics of almost classical assemblies, Phys. Rev. 44, 31 (1933).
  30. L. M. Johansen, Quantum theory of successive projective measurements, Phys. Rev. A 76, 012119 (2007).
  31. R. W. Spekkens, Negativity and contextuality are equivalent notions of nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 020401 (2008).
  32. H. Margenau and R. N. Hill, Correlation between Measurements in Quantum Theory, Progress of Theoretical Physics 26, 722 (1961).
  33. S. Tanaka and N. Yamamoto, Information amplification via postselection: A parameter-estimation perspective, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042116 (2013).
  34. J. Fiurášek, Optimal linear-optical noiseless quantum amplifiers driven by auxiliary multiphoton fock states, Phys. Rev. A 105, 062425 (2022).

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.