Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Extended Fayans energy density functional: optimization and analysis

Published 23 Feb 2024 in nucl-th and math.OC | (2402.15380v1)

Abstract: The Fayans energy density functional (EDF) has been very successful in describing global nuclear properties (binding energies, charge radii, and especially differences of radii) within nuclear density functional theory. In a recent study, supervised machine learning methods were used to calibrate the Fayans EDF. Building on this experience, in this work we explore the effect of adding isovector pairing terms, which are responsible for different proton and neutron pairing fields, by comparing a 13D model without the isovector pairing term against the extended 14D model. At the heart of the calibration is a carefully selected heterogeneous dataset of experimental observables representing ground-state properties of spherical even-even nuclei. To quantify the impact of the calibration dataset on model parameters and the importance of the new terms, we carry out advanced sensitivity and correlation analysis on both models. The extension to 14D improves the overall quality of the model by about 30%. The enhanced degrees of freedom of the 14D model reduce correlations between model parameters and enhance sensitivity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Bender M, Heenen P H and Reinhard P G 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 121–180 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
  2. Schunck N 2019 Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei (IOP Publishing) ISBN 978-0-7503-1422-0 URL https://iopscience.iop.org/book/978-0-7503-1422-0
  3. Fayans S A 1998 J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 68 169–174 URL https://doi.org/10.1134/1.567841
  4. Reinhard P G and Nazarewicz W 2017 Phys. Rev. C 95(6) 064328 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064328
  5. Gorges C et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(19) 192502 URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.192502
  6. Borzov I N and Tolokonnikov S V 2020 Phys. Atom. Nucl. 83 828–840 URL https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778820060101
  7. Reinhard P G and Nazarewicz W 2022 Phys. Rev. C 105(2) L021301 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021301
  8. Karthein J et al. 2023 Nat. Phys. submitted
  9. Reinhard P G 1991 Skyrme–Hartree–Fock calculations of the nuclear ground state Computational Nuclear Physics I - Nuclear Structure ed Langanke K, Koonin S and Maruhn J (Berlin: Springer) p 28 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9335-1
  10. Reinhard P G, Schuetrumpf B and Maruhn J 2021 Comp. Phys. Comm. 258 107603 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107603
  11. Birge R T 1932 Phys. Rev. 40 207–227 URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.40.207
  12. Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Reinhard P G 2014 J. Phys. G 41 074001 URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0954-3899/41/7/074001
  13. Wild S M 2017 POUNDERS in TAO: Solving derivative-free nonlinear least squares problems with POUNDERS Advances and Trends in Optimization with Engineering Applications ed Terlaky T, Anjos M F and Ahmed S (SIAM) pp 529–539 URL https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974683.ch40
  14. Friedrich J and Vögler N 1982 Nucl. Phys. A 373 192–224 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90147-6
  15. Reinhard P G, Nazarewicz W and Garcia Ruiz R F 2020 Phys. Rev. C 101(2) 021301 URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.021301
  16. Moré J J and Wild S M 2011 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 1292–1314 URL https://doi.org/10.1137/100786125
  17. Moré J J and Wild S M 2012 ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 38 19:1–19:21 URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2168773.2168777
  18. Moré J J and Wild S M 2014 J. Comput. Phys. 273 268–277 URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.04.056
  19. Erler J and Reinhard P G 2015 J. Phys. G 42 034026 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034026
  20. Reinhard P G and Nazarewicz W 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81(5) 051303 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.051303
  21. Reinhard P G, Roca-Maza X and Nazarewicz W 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(23) 232501 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.232501
  22. Björck Å 1996 Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) URL https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9781611971484
  23. Audi G, Wapstra A and Thibault C 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 729(1) 337 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003
  24. Angeli I and Marinova K P 2013 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99 69 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006
  25. Reinhard P G and Flocard H 1995 Nucl. Phys. A 584 467 URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00770-N
  26. Raman S, Nestor C W and Tikkanen P 2001 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78(1) 1 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X01908587
  27. Reinhard P G 1978 Z. Phys. A 285 93 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410231
  28. Erler J, Klüpfel P and Reinhard P G 2011 J. Phys. G 38 033101 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/38/3/033101
  29. Reinhard P G and Nazarewicz W 2022 Phys. Rev. C 106(1) 014303 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.014303

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.